Cargando…

Outcomes from deep brain stimulation targeting subthalamic nucleus and caudal zona incerta for Parkinson’s disease

Both subthalamic nucleus (STN) and caudal zona incerta (cZI) have been implicated as the optimal locus for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson’s disease (PD). We present a retrospective clinico-anatomical analysis of outcomes from DBS targeting both STN and cZI. Forty patients underwent bilate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mostofi, Abteen, Evans, Julian M., Partington-Smith, Lucy, Yu, Kenny, Chen, Cliff, Silverdale, Monty A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6704060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31453317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41531-019-0089-1
_version_ 1783445427349094400
author Mostofi, Abteen
Evans, Julian M.
Partington-Smith, Lucy
Yu, Kenny
Chen, Cliff
Silverdale, Monty A.
author_facet Mostofi, Abteen
Evans, Julian M.
Partington-Smith, Lucy
Yu, Kenny
Chen, Cliff
Silverdale, Monty A.
author_sort Mostofi, Abteen
collection PubMed
description Both subthalamic nucleus (STN) and caudal zona incerta (cZI) have been implicated as the optimal locus for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson’s disease (PD). We present a retrospective clinico-anatomical analysis of outcomes from DBS targeting both STN and cZI. Forty patients underwent bilateral DBS using an image-verified implantable guide tube/stylette technique. Contacts on the same quadripolar lead were placed in both STN and cZI. After pulse generator programming, contacts yielding the best clinical effect were selected for chronic stimulation. OFF-medication unified PD rating scale (UPDRS) part III scores pre-operatively and ON-stimulation at 1–2 year follow up were compared. Active contacts at follow-up were anatomically localised from peri-operative imaging. Overall, mean UPDRS part III score improvement was 55 ± 9% (95% confidence interval), with improvement in subscores for rigidity (59 ± 13%), bradykinesia (58 ± 13%), tremor (71 ± 24%) and axial features (36 ± 19%). Active contacts were distributed in the following locations: (1) within posterior/dorsal STN (50%); (2) dorsal to STN (24%); (3) in cZI (21%); and (4) lateral to STN (5%). When contacts were grouped by location, no significant differences between groups were seen in baseline or post-operative improvement in contralateral UPDRS part III subscores. We conclude that when both STN and cZI are targeted, active contacts are distributed most commonly within and immediately dorsal to STN. In a subgroup of cases, cZI contacts were selected for chronic stimulation in preference. Dual targeting of STN and cZI is feasible and may provide extra benefit compared with conventional STN DBS is some patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6704060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67040602019-08-26 Outcomes from deep brain stimulation targeting subthalamic nucleus and caudal zona incerta for Parkinson’s disease Mostofi, Abteen Evans, Julian M. Partington-Smith, Lucy Yu, Kenny Chen, Cliff Silverdale, Monty A. NPJ Parkinsons Dis Article Both subthalamic nucleus (STN) and caudal zona incerta (cZI) have been implicated as the optimal locus for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson’s disease (PD). We present a retrospective clinico-anatomical analysis of outcomes from DBS targeting both STN and cZI. Forty patients underwent bilateral DBS using an image-verified implantable guide tube/stylette technique. Contacts on the same quadripolar lead were placed in both STN and cZI. After pulse generator programming, contacts yielding the best clinical effect were selected for chronic stimulation. OFF-medication unified PD rating scale (UPDRS) part III scores pre-operatively and ON-stimulation at 1–2 year follow up were compared. Active contacts at follow-up were anatomically localised from peri-operative imaging. Overall, mean UPDRS part III score improvement was 55 ± 9% (95% confidence interval), with improvement in subscores for rigidity (59 ± 13%), bradykinesia (58 ± 13%), tremor (71 ± 24%) and axial features (36 ± 19%). Active contacts were distributed in the following locations: (1) within posterior/dorsal STN (50%); (2) dorsal to STN (24%); (3) in cZI (21%); and (4) lateral to STN (5%). When contacts were grouped by location, no significant differences between groups were seen in baseline or post-operative improvement in contralateral UPDRS part III subscores. We conclude that when both STN and cZI are targeted, active contacts are distributed most commonly within and immediately dorsal to STN. In a subgroup of cases, cZI contacts were selected for chronic stimulation in preference. Dual targeting of STN and cZI is feasible and may provide extra benefit compared with conventional STN DBS is some patients. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6704060/ /pubmed/31453317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41531-019-0089-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Mostofi, Abteen
Evans, Julian M.
Partington-Smith, Lucy
Yu, Kenny
Chen, Cliff
Silverdale, Monty A.
Outcomes from deep brain stimulation targeting subthalamic nucleus and caudal zona incerta for Parkinson’s disease
title Outcomes from deep brain stimulation targeting subthalamic nucleus and caudal zona incerta for Parkinson’s disease
title_full Outcomes from deep brain stimulation targeting subthalamic nucleus and caudal zona incerta for Parkinson’s disease
title_fullStr Outcomes from deep brain stimulation targeting subthalamic nucleus and caudal zona incerta for Parkinson’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes from deep brain stimulation targeting subthalamic nucleus and caudal zona incerta for Parkinson’s disease
title_short Outcomes from deep brain stimulation targeting subthalamic nucleus and caudal zona incerta for Parkinson’s disease
title_sort outcomes from deep brain stimulation targeting subthalamic nucleus and caudal zona incerta for parkinson’s disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6704060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31453317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41531-019-0089-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mostofiabteen outcomesfromdeepbrainstimulationtargetingsubthalamicnucleusandcaudalzonaincertaforparkinsonsdisease
AT evansjulianm outcomesfromdeepbrainstimulationtargetingsubthalamicnucleusandcaudalzonaincertaforparkinsonsdisease
AT partingtonsmithlucy outcomesfromdeepbrainstimulationtargetingsubthalamicnucleusandcaudalzonaincertaforparkinsonsdisease
AT yukenny outcomesfromdeepbrainstimulationtargetingsubthalamicnucleusandcaudalzonaincertaforparkinsonsdisease
AT chencliff outcomesfromdeepbrainstimulationtargetingsubthalamicnucleusandcaudalzonaincertaforparkinsonsdisease
AT silverdalemontya outcomesfromdeepbrainstimulationtargetingsubthalamicnucleusandcaudalzonaincertaforparkinsonsdisease