Cargando…

A survey of prescribing practices by general dentists in Australia

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies of dental antibiotic prescribing show that overprescribing is a worldwide occurrence. The aim of this study was to assess prescribing practices of general dentists in Australia for antibiotics, analgesics and anxiolytics and to determine the extent to which prescribing i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teoh, L., Marino, R. J., Stewart, K., McCullough, M. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6704722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31438922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0882-6
_version_ 1783445560770953216
author Teoh, L.
Marino, R. J.
Stewart, K.
McCullough, M. J.
author_facet Teoh, L.
Marino, R. J.
Stewart, K.
McCullough, M. J.
author_sort Teoh, L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Numerous studies of dental antibiotic prescribing show that overprescribing is a worldwide occurrence. The aim of this study was to assess prescribing practices of general dentists in Australia for antibiotics, analgesics and anxiolytics and to determine the extent to which prescribing is in accordance with current guidelines. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was sent to 1468 dentists in Victoria and Queensland in July–August 2018. The questionnaire covered demographics, clinical conditions where dentists prescribe antibiotics, non-clinical factors which influence prescribing, and medicines for anxiolysis and pain relief. Responses were scored using a system based on the current Australian therapeutic guidelines. Logistic regression was used to determine the relative importance of independent variables on inappropriate prescribing. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-two responses were received. Overall, 55% of overprescribing of antibiotics was detected, with a range of 13–88% on a routine or occasional basis depending on the scenario. Between 16 and 27% of respondents inappropriately preferenced analgesics over anti-inflammatories for dental pain; 46% of those who prescribed anxiolytic medicines did so inappropriately, with varying regimens and choices outside the guidelines. Years of practice was the main demographic factor influencing prescribing, with recent graduates (0–5 years) generally scoring better than their colleagues for antibiotic prescribing (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Future interventions could be directed towards the appropriate role and use of antibiotics, shortfalls in knowledge and appropriate choices of medicines for pain relief and anxiolysis. Given that the most overprescribing occurred for localised swellings (88%), this area could be focused on in continuing education as well as ensuring it is addressed in undergraduate teaching. Continuing education on the appropriate use of medicines can be targeted at more experienced dentists as well as patients, especially those who expect antibiotics instead of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University of Melbourne Human Ethics Sub-Committee; ID: 1750768.1. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12903-019-0882-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6704722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67047222019-08-28 A survey of prescribing practices by general dentists in Australia Teoh, L. Marino, R. J. Stewart, K. McCullough, M. J. BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Numerous studies of dental antibiotic prescribing show that overprescribing is a worldwide occurrence. The aim of this study was to assess prescribing practices of general dentists in Australia for antibiotics, analgesics and anxiolytics and to determine the extent to which prescribing is in accordance with current guidelines. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was sent to 1468 dentists in Victoria and Queensland in July–August 2018. The questionnaire covered demographics, clinical conditions where dentists prescribe antibiotics, non-clinical factors which influence prescribing, and medicines for anxiolysis and pain relief. Responses were scored using a system based on the current Australian therapeutic guidelines. Logistic regression was used to determine the relative importance of independent variables on inappropriate prescribing. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-two responses were received. Overall, 55% of overprescribing of antibiotics was detected, with a range of 13–88% on a routine or occasional basis depending on the scenario. Between 16 and 27% of respondents inappropriately preferenced analgesics over anti-inflammatories for dental pain; 46% of those who prescribed anxiolytic medicines did so inappropriately, with varying regimens and choices outside the guidelines. Years of practice was the main demographic factor influencing prescribing, with recent graduates (0–5 years) generally scoring better than their colleagues for antibiotic prescribing (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Future interventions could be directed towards the appropriate role and use of antibiotics, shortfalls in knowledge and appropriate choices of medicines for pain relief and anxiolysis. Given that the most overprescribing occurred for localised swellings (88%), this area could be focused on in continuing education as well as ensuring it is addressed in undergraduate teaching. Continuing education on the appropriate use of medicines can be targeted at more experienced dentists as well as patients, especially those who expect antibiotics instead of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University of Melbourne Human Ethics Sub-Committee; ID: 1750768.1. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12903-019-0882-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6704722/ /pubmed/31438922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0882-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Teoh, L.
Marino, R. J.
Stewart, K.
McCullough, M. J.
A survey of prescribing practices by general dentists in Australia
title A survey of prescribing practices by general dentists in Australia
title_full A survey of prescribing practices by general dentists in Australia
title_fullStr A survey of prescribing practices by general dentists in Australia
title_full_unstemmed A survey of prescribing practices by general dentists in Australia
title_short A survey of prescribing practices by general dentists in Australia
title_sort survey of prescribing practices by general dentists in australia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6704722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31438922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0882-6
work_keys_str_mv AT teohl asurveyofprescribingpracticesbygeneraldentistsinaustralia
AT marinorj asurveyofprescribingpracticesbygeneraldentistsinaustralia
AT stewartk asurveyofprescribingpracticesbygeneraldentistsinaustralia
AT mcculloughmj asurveyofprescribingpracticesbygeneraldentistsinaustralia
AT teohl surveyofprescribingpracticesbygeneraldentistsinaustralia
AT marinorj surveyofprescribingpracticesbygeneraldentistsinaustralia
AT stewartk surveyofprescribingpracticesbygeneraldentistsinaustralia
AT mcculloughmj surveyofprescribingpracticesbygeneraldentistsinaustralia