Cargando…
Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen
PURPOSE: To Compare the extent and intensity of adhesions formed between the intra-abdominal organs and the intraperitoneal implants of polypropylene mesh versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen used for correction of abdominal wall defect in rats. METHODS: After the de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6705338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31432994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020190060000003 |
_version_ | 1783445599633276928 |
---|---|
author | Ribeiro, Waston Gonçalves Rodrigues, Diego Vinnicyus Santos Atta, Francisco Felipe Moreira Ramos, Izabelle Smith Frazão Frazão, Fabiola Nassar Sousa Torres, Orlando Jorge Martins Pitombo, Marcos Bettini |
author_facet | Ribeiro, Waston Gonçalves Rodrigues, Diego Vinnicyus Santos Atta, Francisco Felipe Moreira Ramos, Izabelle Smith Frazão Frazão, Fabiola Nassar Sousa Torres, Orlando Jorge Martins Pitombo, Marcos Bettini |
author_sort | Ribeiro, Waston Gonçalves |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To Compare the extent and intensity of adhesions formed between the intra-abdominal organs and the intraperitoneal implants of polypropylene mesh versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen used for correction of abdominal wall defect in rats. METHODS: After the defect in the abdominal wall, thirty Wistar rats were placed in three groups (ten animals each) for intraperitoneal mesh implant: polypropylene group, polypropylene/polyglecaprone group, and polyester/porcine collagen group. The macroscopic evaluation of the extent and intensity of adhesions was performed 21 days after the implant. RESULTS: The polypropylene group had a higher statistically significant impairment due to visceral adhesions (p value = 0.002) and a higher degree of intense adherence in relation to polypropylene/polyglecaprone and polyester/porcine collagen groups (p value<0.001). The polyester/porcine collagen group showed more intense adhesions than the polypropylene/polyglecaprone group (p value=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The intraperitoneal implantation of polypropylene meshes to correct defects of the abdominal wall caused the appearance of extensive and firm adhesions to intra-abdominal structures. The use of polypropylene/polyglecaprone or polyester/porcine collagen tissue-separating meshes reduces the number and degree of adhesions formed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6705338 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67053382019-08-29 Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen Ribeiro, Waston Gonçalves Rodrigues, Diego Vinnicyus Santos Atta, Francisco Felipe Moreira Ramos, Izabelle Smith Frazão Frazão, Fabiola Nassar Sousa Torres, Orlando Jorge Martins Pitombo, Marcos Bettini Acta Cir Bras Original Articles PURPOSE: To Compare the extent and intensity of adhesions formed between the intra-abdominal organs and the intraperitoneal implants of polypropylene mesh versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen used for correction of abdominal wall defect in rats. METHODS: After the defect in the abdominal wall, thirty Wistar rats were placed in three groups (ten animals each) for intraperitoneal mesh implant: polypropylene group, polypropylene/polyglecaprone group, and polyester/porcine collagen group. The macroscopic evaluation of the extent and intensity of adhesions was performed 21 days after the implant. RESULTS: The polypropylene group had a higher statistically significant impairment due to visceral adhesions (p value = 0.002) and a higher degree of intense adherence in relation to polypropylene/polyglecaprone and polyester/porcine collagen groups (p value<0.001). The polyester/porcine collagen group showed more intense adhesions than the polypropylene/polyglecaprone group (p value=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The intraperitoneal implantation of polypropylene meshes to correct defects of the abdominal wall caused the appearance of extensive and firm adhesions to intra-abdominal structures. The use of polypropylene/polyglecaprone or polyester/porcine collagen tissue-separating meshes reduces the number and degree of adhesions formed. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2019-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6705338/ /pubmed/31432994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020190060000003 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Ribeiro, Waston Gonçalves Rodrigues, Diego Vinnicyus Santos Atta, Francisco Felipe Moreira Ramos, Izabelle Smith Frazão Frazão, Fabiola Nassar Sousa Torres, Orlando Jorge Martins Pitombo, Marcos Bettini Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen |
title | Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen
|
title_full | Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen
|
title_fullStr | Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen
|
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen
|
title_short | Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen
|
title_sort | comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6705338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31432994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020190060000003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ribeirowastongoncalves comparativestudyofperitonealadhesionsafterintraperitonealimplantationinratsofmeshesofpolypropyleneversuspolypropylenepolyglecaproneversuspolyesterporcinecollagen AT rodriguesdiegovinnicyussantos comparativestudyofperitonealadhesionsafterintraperitonealimplantationinratsofmeshesofpolypropyleneversuspolypropylenepolyglecaproneversuspolyesterporcinecollagen AT attafranciscofelipemoreira comparativestudyofperitonealadhesionsafterintraperitonealimplantationinratsofmeshesofpolypropyleneversuspolypropylenepolyglecaproneversuspolyesterporcinecollagen AT ramosizabellesmithfrazao comparativestudyofperitonealadhesionsafterintraperitonealimplantationinratsofmeshesofpolypropyleneversuspolypropylenepolyglecaproneversuspolyesterporcinecollagen AT frazaofabiolanassarsousa comparativestudyofperitonealadhesionsafterintraperitonealimplantationinratsofmeshesofpolypropyleneversuspolypropylenepolyglecaproneversuspolyesterporcinecollagen AT torresorlandojorgemartins comparativestudyofperitonealadhesionsafterintraperitonealimplantationinratsofmeshesofpolypropyleneversuspolypropylenepolyglecaproneversuspolyesterporcinecollagen AT pitombomarcosbettini comparativestudyofperitonealadhesionsafterintraperitonealimplantationinratsofmeshesofpolypropyleneversuspolypropylenepolyglecaproneversuspolyesterporcinecollagen |