Cargando…

A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education

BACKGROUND: Dentistry has undergone an evolution in endodontics practice caused by the advancement of rotary techniques for root canal preparation and their subsequent incorporation into the teaching of dentistry undergraduates. This research aimed to evaluate the shaping ability of third-year denta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Çelik, Gül, Özdemir Kısacık, Feyza, Yılmaz, Emir Faruk, Mersinlioğlu, Arife, Ertuğrul, İhsan Furkan, Orhan, Hikmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6705381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489262
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7419
_version_ 1783445602246328320
author Çelik, Gül
Özdemir Kısacık, Feyza
Yılmaz, Emir Faruk
Mersinlioğlu, Arife
Ertuğrul, İhsan Furkan
Orhan, Hikmet
author_facet Çelik, Gül
Özdemir Kısacık, Feyza
Yılmaz, Emir Faruk
Mersinlioğlu, Arife
Ertuğrul, İhsan Furkan
Orhan, Hikmet
author_sort Çelik, Gül
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dentistry has undergone an evolution in endodontics practice caused by the advancement of rotary techniques for root canal preparation and their subsequent incorporation into the teaching of dentistry undergraduates. This research aimed to evaluate the shaping ability of third-year dental students as their first experience in rotary instrumentation using ProTaper Universal (PTU) and ProTaper Next (PTN) (Dentsply Maillefer) rotary instruments in simulated curved canals. METHODS: Forty students instrumented 200 simulated canals with a 40° curvature in resin blocks according to the manufacturer’s instructions with PTU and 39 students and 195 canals with PTN files. The canals were prepared at a speed of 300 rpm using a 16:1 reduction hand-piece powered by an electric motor (Xsmart; Dentsply Maillefer). The final apical preparation was set to F2 for the PTU and X2 for the PTN group. The change in canal curvature was evaluated based on Schneider technique using the AutoCAD 2007 software on post-digital photographs. The incidence of instrument fracture and deformation, the incidence of ledge, the change in working length (WL), and the working time were noted. The data were analyzed with Student’s t-test and Chi-Square test at a significance level of 0.05 using SPSS. RESULTS: PTN maintained the original canal curvature better, resulting in fewer fractures and ledges, and shaped the canals faster than the PTU (P < 0.05). The mean curves of the resin canals after the instrumentation for the PTU and PTN groups were 24.03° ± 3.14° and 25.64° ± 2.72°, respectively. Thirty-three (17.4%) PTU and 18 (9.3%) PTN files fractured (p < 0.05). Nine (4.5%) PTU and 2 (2.6%) PTN deformed (p > 0.05). The change in WL after instrumentation was 0.97 mm ± 0.95 mm in PTU and 0.96 mm ± 0.80 mm in PTN (p < 0.05). The mean times were 627 s ± 18 s for PTU and 379 s ± 18 s for PTN (p < 0.000). DISCUSSION: PTN can be recommended in severely curved root canals in terms of maintenance of the original canal curvature, superior instrument fracture and fewer ledges. Even if training before preparation provides an acceptable level of canal shaping for preclinical students, the use of NiTi rotary instruments should be included in the undergraduate dental curriculum, contributing to an increase in the quality of root canal shaping and, consequently, to an improvement of the clinical experience of students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6705381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67053812019-09-05 A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education Çelik, Gül Özdemir Kısacık, Feyza Yılmaz, Emir Faruk Mersinlioğlu, Arife Ertuğrul, İhsan Furkan Orhan, Hikmet PeerJ Biotechnology BACKGROUND: Dentistry has undergone an evolution in endodontics practice caused by the advancement of rotary techniques for root canal preparation and their subsequent incorporation into the teaching of dentistry undergraduates. This research aimed to evaluate the shaping ability of third-year dental students as their first experience in rotary instrumentation using ProTaper Universal (PTU) and ProTaper Next (PTN) (Dentsply Maillefer) rotary instruments in simulated curved canals. METHODS: Forty students instrumented 200 simulated canals with a 40° curvature in resin blocks according to the manufacturer’s instructions with PTU and 39 students and 195 canals with PTN files. The canals were prepared at a speed of 300 rpm using a 16:1 reduction hand-piece powered by an electric motor (Xsmart; Dentsply Maillefer). The final apical preparation was set to F2 for the PTU and X2 for the PTN group. The change in canal curvature was evaluated based on Schneider technique using the AutoCAD 2007 software on post-digital photographs. The incidence of instrument fracture and deformation, the incidence of ledge, the change in working length (WL), and the working time were noted. The data were analyzed with Student’s t-test and Chi-Square test at a significance level of 0.05 using SPSS. RESULTS: PTN maintained the original canal curvature better, resulting in fewer fractures and ledges, and shaped the canals faster than the PTU (P < 0.05). The mean curves of the resin canals after the instrumentation for the PTU and PTN groups were 24.03° ± 3.14° and 25.64° ± 2.72°, respectively. Thirty-three (17.4%) PTU and 18 (9.3%) PTN files fractured (p < 0.05). Nine (4.5%) PTU and 2 (2.6%) PTN deformed (p > 0.05). The change in WL after instrumentation was 0.97 mm ± 0.95 mm in PTU and 0.96 mm ± 0.80 mm in PTN (p < 0.05). The mean times were 627 s ± 18 s for PTU and 379 s ± 18 s for PTN (p < 0.000). DISCUSSION: PTN can be recommended in severely curved root canals in terms of maintenance of the original canal curvature, superior instrument fracture and fewer ledges. Even if training before preparation provides an acceptable level of canal shaping for preclinical students, the use of NiTi rotary instruments should be included in the undergraduate dental curriculum, contributing to an increase in the quality of root canal shaping and, consequently, to an improvement of the clinical experience of students. PeerJ Inc. 2019-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6705381/ /pubmed/31489262 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7419 Text en ©2019 Çelik et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Biotechnology
Çelik, Gül
Özdemir Kısacık, Feyza
Yılmaz, Emir Faruk
Mersinlioğlu, Arife
Ertuğrul, İhsan Furkan
Orhan, Hikmet
A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education
title A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education
title_full A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education
title_fullStr A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education
title_short A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education
title_sort comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education
topic Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6705381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489262
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7419
work_keys_str_mv AT celikgul acomparativestudyofrootcanalshapingusingprotaperuniversalandprotapernextrotaryfilesinpreclinicaldentaleducation
AT ozdemirkısacıkfeyza acomparativestudyofrootcanalshapingusingprotaperuniversalandprotapernextrotaryfilesinpreclinicaldentaleducation
AT yılmazemirfaruk acomparativestudyofrootcanalshapingusingprotaperuniversalandprotapernextrotaryfilesinpreclinicaldentaleducation
AT mersinliogluarife acomparativestudyofrootcanalshapingusingprotaperuniversalandprotapernextrotaryfilesinpreclinicaldentaleducation
AT ertugrulihsanfurkan acomparativestudyofrootcanalshapingusingprotaperuniversalandprotapernextrotaryfilesinpreclinicaldentaleducation
AT orhanhikmet acomparativestudyofrootcanalshapingusingprotaperuniversalandprotapernextrotaryfilesinpreclinicaldentaleducation
AT celikgul comparativestudyofrootcanalshapingusingprotaperuniversalandprotapernextrotaryfilesinpreclinicaldentaleducation
AT ozdemirkısacıkfeyza comparativestudyofrootcanalshapingusingprotaperuniversalandprotapernextrotaryfilesinpreclinicaldentaleducation
AT yılmazemirfaruk comparativestudyofrootcanalshapingusingprotaperuniversalandprotapernextrotaryfilesinpreclinicaldentaleducation
AT mersinliogluarife comparativestudyofrootcanalshapingusingprotaperuniversalandprotapernextrotaryfilesinpreclinicaldentaleducation
AT ertugrulihsanfurkan comparativestudyofrootcanalshapingusingprotaperuniversalandprotapernextrotaryfilesinpreclinicaldentaleducation
AT orhanhikmet comparativestudyofrootcanalshapingusingprotaperuniversalandprotapernextrotaryfilesinpreclinicaldentaleducation