Cargando…
Baculovirus entire ORF1629 is not essential for viral replication
It is generally accepted that ORF1629 is essential for baculovirus replication, which has enabled isolation of recombinant viruses in a baculovirus expression system using linearized viral DNA. ORF1629-defective viruses cannot replicate in insect cells; only recombinant virus with complete ORF1629 r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6706055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31437242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221594 |
_version_ | 1783445648678322176 |
---|---|
author | Gwak, Won Seok Lee, See Nae Choi, Jae Bang Kim, Hyun Soo Han, Beom Ku Bae, Sung Min Je, Yeon Ho Woo, Soo Dong |
author_facet | Gwak, Won Seok Lee, See Nae Choi, Jae Bang Kim, Hyun Soo Han, Beom Ku Bae, Sung Min Je, Yeon Ho Woo, Soo Dong |
author_sort | Gwak, Won Seok |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is generally accepted that ORF1629 is essential for baculovirus replication, which has enabled isolation of recombinant viruses in a baculovirus expression system using linearized viral DNA. ORF1629-defective viruses cannot replicate in insect cells; only recombinant virus with complete ORF1629 restoration by recombination can propagate, allowing for pure isolation and the development of bacmids for easy selection of recombinant viruses. We inadvertently found proliferation in insect cells of a bacmid lacking a complete ORF1629. PCR indicated no other viruses but a lack of complete ORF1629 in the proliferated bacmid, suggesting that the baculovirus propagated without a complete ORF1629. Lack of ORF1629 decreased the virus growth rate and yield; it also increased the occlusion body (OB) size but decreased its yield. These results were confirmed for Autographa californica multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV) and Bombyx mori NPV (BmNPV). Thus, entire ORF1629 is not essential for viral replication, though it does affect the virus growth rate, yield, and size and OB production. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6706055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67060552019-09-04 Baculovirus entire ORF1629 is not essential for viral replication Gwak, Won Seok Lee, See Nae Choi, Jae Bang Kim, Hyun Soo Han, Beom Ku Bae, Sung Min Je, Yeon Ho Woo, Soo Dong PLoS One Research Article It is generally accepted that ORF1629 is essential for baculovirus replication, which has enabled isolation of recombinant viruses in a baculovirus expression system using linearized viral DNA. ORF1629-defective viruses cannot replicate in insect cells; only recombinant virus with complete ORF1629 restoration by recombination can propagate, allowing for pure isolation and the development of bacmids for easy selection of recombinant viruses. We inadvertently found proliferation in insect cells of a bacmid lacking a complete ORF1629. PCR indicated no other viruses but a lack of complete ORF1629 in the proliferated bacmid, suggesting that the baculovirus propagated without a complete ORF1629. Lack of ORF1629 decreased the virus growth rate and yield; it also increased the occlusion body (OB) size but decreased its yield. These results were confirmed for Autographa californica multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV) and Bombyx mori NPV (BmNPV). Thus, entire ORF1629 is not essential for viral replication, though it does affect the virus growth rate, yield, and size and OB production. Public Library of Science 2019-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6706055/ /pubmed/31437242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221594 Text en © 2019 Gwak et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gwak, Won Seok Lee, See Nae Choi, Jae Bang Kim, Hyun Soo Han, Beom Ku Bae, Sung Min Je, Yeon Ho Woo, Soo Dong Baculovirus entire ORF1629 is not essential for viral replication |
title | Baculovirus entire ORF1629 is not essential for viral replication |
title_full | Baculovirus entire ORF1629 is not essential for viral replication |
title_fullStr | Baculovirus entire ORF1629 is not essential for viral replication |
title_full_unstemmed | Baculovirus entire ORF1629 is not essential for viral replication |
title_short | Baculovirus entire ORF1629 is not essential for viral replication |
title_sort | baculovirus entire orf1629 is not essential for viral replication |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6706055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31437242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221594 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gwakwonseok baculovirusentireorf1629isnotessentialforviralreplication AT leeseenae baculovirusentireorf1629isnotessentialforviralreplication AT choijaebang baculovirusentireorf1629isnotessentialforviralreplication AT kimhyunsoo baculovirusentireorf1629isnotessentialforviralreplication AT hanbeomku baculovirusentireorf1629isnotessentialforviralreplication AT baesungmin baculovirusentireorf1629isnotessentialforviralreplication AT jeyeonho baculovirusentireorf1629isnotessentialforviralreplication AT woosoodong baculovirusentireorf1629isnotessentialforviralreplication |