Cargando…

Does miR-618 rs2682818 variant affect cancer susceptibility? Evidence from 10 case–control studies

Piles of evidence have supported the relationship between miR-618 rs2682818 polymorphism and tumorigenesis, but the conclusion remains inconsistent. In the present study, we conducted a meta-analysis to sniff out the potential risk between miR-618 rs2682818 and overall cancers. Crude odds ratios (OR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feng, Xingliang, Ji, Dan, Liang, Chaozhao, Fan, Song
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Portland Press Ltd. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6706600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31383788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20190741
_version_ 1783445720286625792
author Feng, Xingliang
Ji, Dan
Liang, Chaozhao
Fan, Song
author_facet Feng, Xingliang
Ji, Dan
Liang, Chaozhao
Fan, Song
author_sort Feng, Xingliang
collection PubMed
description Piles of evidence have supported the relationship between miR-618 rs2682818 polymorphism and tumorigenesis, but the conclusion remains inconsistent. In the present study, we conducted a meta-analysis to sniff out the potential risk between miR-618 rs2682818 and overall cancers. Crude odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) analyzed by Z-test were employed to estimate the potential interrelation in five genetic models. We also prospected how the rs2682818 affects the second structure of miR-618. Finally, 10 independent studies meet the enrolled criteria, along with 4099 cancer cases and 5057 healthy controls. Overall, no exceeding interrelation was sniffed out in the pooled data among five inherited models, as well as stratified analyses. Whereas, the enhanced cancer risk of miR-618 rs2682818 variant stratified by breast cancer was revealed, in heterozygote genetic model (AC vs. CC: OR = 1.291, 95%CI = 1.012–1.648, P = 0.040) and dominant contrast model (AA + AC vs. CC: OR = 1.280, 95%CI = 1.009–1.623, P = 0.042). The second structure prediction result shown that the mutant A allele might change the first stem-loop of miR-618, and the free energy of it would turn from –39.1 to –35.1 kcal/mol. All in all, our meta-analysis had successfully chased down that miR-618 rs2682818 polymorphism is not linked with overall cancer risk, but in the dominant genotype of breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6706600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Portland Press Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67066002019-09-04 Does miR-618 rs2682818 variant affect cancer susceptibility? Evidence from 10 case–control studies Feng, Xingliang Ji, Dan Liang, Chaozhao Fan, Song Biosci Rep Research Articles Piles of evidence have supported the relationship between miR-618 rs2682818 polymorphism and tumorigenesis, but the conclusion remains inconsistent. In the present study, we conducted a meta-analysis to sniff out the potential risk between miR-618 rs2682818 and overall cancers. Crude odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) analyzed by Z-test were employed to estimate the potential interrelation in five genetic models. We also prospected how the rs2682818 affects the second structure of miR-618. Finally, 10 independent studies meet the enrolled criteria, along with 4099 cancer cases and 5057 healthy controls. Overall, no exceeding interrelation was sniffed out in the pooled data among five inherited models, as well as stratified analyses. Whereas, the enhanced cancer risk of miR-618 rs2682818 variant stratified by breast cancer was revealed, in heterozygote genetic model (AC vs. CC: OR = 1.291, 95%CI = 1.012–1.648, P = 0.040) and dominant contrast model (AA + AC vs. CC: OR = 1.280, 95%CI = 1.009–1.623, P = 0.042). The second structure prediction result shown that the mutant A allele might change the first stem-loop of miR-618, and the free energy of it would turn from –39.1 to –35.1 kcal/mol. All in all, our meta-analysis had successfully chased down that miR-618 rs2682818 polymorphism is not linked with overall cancer risk, but in the dominant genotype of breast cancer. Portland Press Ltd. 2019-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6706600/ /pubmed/31383788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20190741 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Articles
Feng, Xingliang
Ji, Dan
Liang, Chaozhao
Fan, Song
Does miR-618 rs2682818 variant affect cancer susceptibility? Evidence from 10 case–control studies
title Does miR-618 rs2682818 variant affect cancer susceptibility? Evidence from 10 case–control studies
title_full Does miR-618 rs2682818 variant affect cancer susceptibility? Evidence from 10 case–control studies
title_fullStr Does miR-618 rs2682818 variant affect cancer susceptibility? Evidence from 10 case–control studies
title_full_unstemmed Does miR-618 rs2682818 variant affect cancer susceptibility? Evidence from 10 case–control studies
title_short Does miR-618 rs2682818 variant affect cancer susceptibility? Evidence from 10 case–control studies
title_sort does mir-618 rs2682818 variant affect cancer susceptibility? evidence from 10 case–control studies
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6706600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31383788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20190741
work_keys_str_mv AT fengxingliang doesmir618rs2682818variantaffectcancersusceptibilityevidencefrom10casecontrolstudies
AT jidan doesmir618rs2682818variantaffectcancersusceptibilityevidencefrom10casecontrolstudies
AT liangchaozhao doesmir618rs2682818variantaffectcancersusceptibilityevidencefrom10casecontrolstudies
AT fansong doesmir618rs2682818variantaffectcancersusceptibilityevidencefrom10casecontrolstudies