Cargando…

Fertility and family planning in Uttar Pradesh, India: major progress and persistent gaps

BACKGROUND: Uttar Pradesh (UP) is the most populous state in India with historically high levels of fertility rates than the national average. Though fertility levels in UP declined considerably in recent decades, the current level is well above the government’s target of 2.1. DATA AND METHODS: Fert...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halli, Shiva S., Ashwini, Damaraju, Dehury, Bidyadhar, Isac, Shajy, Joseph, Antony, Anand, Preeti, Gothalwal, Vikas, Prakash, Ravi, Ramesh, B. M., Blanchard, James, Boerma, Ties
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6706892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31443724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0790-x
_version_ 1783445771175067648
author Halli, Shiva S.
Ashwini, Damaraju
Dehury, Bidyadhar
Isac, Shajy
Joseph, Antony
Anand, Preeti
Gothalwal, Vikas
Prakash, Ravi
Ramesh, B. M.
Blanchard, James
Boerma, Ties
author_facet Halli, Shiva S.
Ashwini, Damaraju
Dehury, Bidyadhar
Isac, Shajy
Joseph, Antony
Anand, Preeti
Gothalwal, Vikas
Prakash, Ravi
Ramesh, B. M.
Blanchard, James
Boerma, Ties
author_sort Halli, Shiva S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Uttar Pradesh (UP) is the most populous state in India with historically high levels of fertility rates than the national average. Though fertility levels in UP declined considerably in recent decades, the current level is well above the government’s target of 2.1. DATA AND METHODS: Fertility and family planning data obtained from the different rounds of Sample Registration System (SRS) and the National Family Health Survey (NFHS). We analyzed fertility and family planning trends in India and UP, including differences in methods mix, using SRS (1971–2016) and NFHS (1992–2016). Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were used. RESULTS: From 2000, while the total fertility rate (TFR) declined in UP, it is still well above the national level in 2015–16 (2.7 vs 2.18, respectively). The demand for family planning satisfied increased from 52 to 72% during 1998–99 to 2015–16 in UP, compared to an increase from 75 to 81% in India. Traditional methods play a much greater role in UP than in India (22 and 9% of the demand satisfied respectively), while use of sterilization was relatively low in UP when compared to the national averages (18.0 and 36.3% of current married women 15–49 years in UP and India, respectively in 2015–16). Within UP, district fertility ranged from 1.6 to 4.4, with higher fertility concentrated in districts with low female schooling, predominantly located in north-central UP. Fertility declines were largest in districts with high fertility in the late nineties (B = 7.33, p < .001). Among currently married women, use of traditional methods increased and accounted for almost one-third of users in 2015–16. Use of sterilization declined but remained the primary method (ranging from 33 to 41% of users in high and low fertility districts respectively) while condom use increased from 17 and 16% in 1998–99 to 23 and 25% in 2015–16 in low and high fertility districts respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Greater reliance on traditional methods and condoms coupled with relatively low demand for modern contraception suggest inadequate access to modern contraceptives, especially in district with high fertility rates. Family planning activities need to be appropriately scaled according to need and geography to ensure the achievement of state-level improvements in family planning programs and fertility outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6706892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67068922019-08-28 Fertility and family planning in Uttar Pradesh, India: major progress and persistent gaps Halli, Shiva S. Ashwini, Damaraju Dehury, Bidyadhar Isac, Shajy Joseph, Antony Anand, Preeti Gothalwal, Vikas Prakash, Ravi Ramesh, B. M. Blanchard, James Boerma, Ties Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: Uttar Pradesh (UP) is the most populous state in India with historically high levels of fertility rates than the national average. Though fertility levels in UP declined considerably in recent decades, the current level is well above the government’s target of 2.1. DATA AND METHODS: Fertility and family planning data obtained from the different rounds of Sample Registration System (SRS) and the National Family Health Survey (NFHS). We analyzed fertility and family planning trends in India and UP, including differences in methods mix, using SRS (1971–2016) and NFHS (1992–2016). Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were used. RESULTS: From 2000, while the total fertility rate (TFR) declined in UP, it is still well above the national level in 2015–16 (2.7 vs 2.18, respectively). The demand for family planning satisfied increased from 52 to 72% during 1998–99 to 2015–16 in UP, compared to an increase from 75 to 81% in India. Traditional methods play a much greater role in UP than in India (22 and 9% of the demand satisfied respectively), while use of sterilization was relatively low in UP when compared to the national averages (18.0 and 36.3% of current married women 15–49 years in UP and India, respectively in 2015–16). Within UP, district fertility ranged from 1.6 to 4.4, with higher fertility concentrated in districts with low female schooling, predominantly located in north-central UP. Fertility declines were largest in districts with high fertility in the late nineties (B = 7.33, p < .001). Among currently married women, use of traditional methods increased and accounted for almost one-third of users in 2015–16. Use of sterilization declined but remained the primary method (ranging from 33 to 41% of users in high and low fertility districts respectively) while condom use increased from 17 and 16% in 1998–99 to 23 and 25% in 2015–16 in low and high fertility districts respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Greater reliance on traditional methods and condoms coupled with relatively low demand for modern contraception suggest inadequate access to modern contraceptives, especially in district with high fertility rates. Family planning activities need to be appropriately scaled according to need and geography to ensure the achievement of state-level improvements in family planning programs and fertility outcomes. BioMed Central 2019-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6706892/ /pubmed/31443724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0790-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Halli, Shiva S.
Ashwini, Damaraju
Dehury, Bidyadhar
Isac, Shajy
Joseph, Antony
Anand, Preeti
Gothalwal, Vikas
Prakash, Ravi
Ramesh, B. M.
Blanchard, James
Boerma, Ties
Fertility and family planning in Uttar Pradesh, India: major progress and persistent gaps
title Fertility and family planning in Uttar Pradesh, India: major progress and persistent gaps
title_full Fertility and family planning in Uttar Pradesh, India: major progress and persistent gaps
title_fullStr Fertility and family planning in Uttar Pradesh, India: major progress and persistent gaps
title_full_unstemmed Fertility and family planning in Uttar Pradesh, India: major progress and persistent gaps
title_short Fertility and family planning in Uttar Pradesh, India: major progress and persistent gaps
title_sort fertility and family planning in uttar pradesh, india: major progress and persistent gaps
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6706892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31443724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0790-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hallishivas fertilityandfamilyplanninginuttarpradeshindiamajorprogressandpersistentgaps
AT ashwinidamaraju fertilityandfamilyplanninginuttarpradeshindiamajorprogressandpersistentgaps
AT dehurybidyadhar fertilityandfamilyplanninginuttarpradeshindiamajorprogressandpersistentgaps
AT isacshajy fertilityandfamilyplanninginuttarpradeshindiamajorprogressandpersistentgaps
AT josephantony fertilityandfamilyplanninginuttarpradeshindiamajorprogressandpersistentgaps
AT anandpreeti fertilityandfamilyplanninginuttarpradeshindiamajorprogressandpersistentgaps
AT gothalwalvikas fertilityandfamilyplanninginuttarpradeshindiamajorprogressandpersistentgaps
AT prakashravi fertilityandfamilyplanninginuttarpradeshindiamajorprogressandpersistentgaps
AT rameshbm fertilityandfamilyplanninginuttarpradeshindiamajorprogressandpersistentgaps
AT blanchardjames fertilityandfamilyplanninginuttarpradeshindiamajorprogressandpersistentgaps
AT boermaties fertilityandfamilyplanninginuttarpradeshindiamajorprogressandpersistentgaps