Cargando…

A comparative study on shared-use medicines in Tibetan and Chinese medicine

BACKGROUND: Tibetan medicine (TM) and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) are two independent traditional medical systems. Due to geographical factors, the development of Tibetan medicinal theory is relatively independent, but there are still many shared-use medicines in TM and TCM. However, a thorou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Ming-ming, Wang, Ke-ru, Gu, Rui, Zhong, Shi-hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6706903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31443668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-019-0320-5
_version_ 1783445773854179328
author Zhao, Ming-ming
Wang, Ke-ru
Gu, Rui
Zhong, Shi-hong
author_facet Zhao, Ming-ming
Wang, Ke-ru
Gu, Rui
Zhong, Shi-hong
author_sort Zhao, Ming-ming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tibetan medicine (TM) and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) are two independent traditional medical systems. Due to geographical factors, the development of Tibetan medicinal theory is relatively independent, but there are still many shared-use medicines in TM and TCM. However, a thorough and comparative study on those medicines is still absent. This study listed shared-use medicines by TM and TCM and analyzed the similarities and dissimilarities of these two medical systems. This paper also aimed to understand mutual influences like the shared history of TM and TCM and to roughly outline the exchanging process between them. METHODS: Shared-use medicines in TM and TCM were listed alphabetically. Information on the scientific name, material name, medicinal parts, and medical efficacy were extracted from publications. Shared-use medicines were grouped according to medicinal properties and medicinal parts used by TM and TCM. The historical origin and current status of clinical prescriptions of shared-use medicines were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 136 shared-use medicines in TM and TCM were listed. Shared-use medicines that were used for a similar purpose in TM and TCM accounted for 14% of the total, while those used for different purposes accounted for 49% of the total, with some of the latter being commonly used in TCM. Shared-use medicinal herbs that originated from both Tibetan and Han regions accounted for 49% of the total, and those that were imported from South Asia and Southeast Asia were frequently observed in TM. CONCLUSION: Owing to its unique geographical location and cultural diversity, the Tibetan region played a role as a development cradle for various traditional medicinal theories and knowledge. Medicinal knowledge was exchanged between TM and TCM during their parallel independent growth. Shared-use medicines in TM and TCM were mostly determined by flora similarity and medicinal trade, and they marked significant differences in their medicinal properties. However, medicines that were used for similar purposes in TM and TCM presented obvious commercial medicinal characteristic as well as the same chemical profile. The Tibetan region not only provided medicinal usage knowledge of TCM, but also served as a supply of medicinal resources attributing to “high altitude” locations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6706903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67069032019-08-28 A comparative study on shared-use medicines in Tibetan and Chinese medicine Zhao, Ming-ming Wang, Ke-ru Gu, Rui Zhong, Shi-hong J Ethnobiol Ethnomed Research BACKGROUND: Tibetan medicine (TM) and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) are two independent traditional medical systems. Due to geographical factors, the development of Tibetan medicinal theory is relatively independent, but there are still many shared-use medicines in TM and TCM. However, a thorough and comparative study on those medicines is still absent. This study listed shared-use medicines by TM and TCM and analyzed the similarities and dissimilarities of these two medical systems. This paper also aimed to understand mutual influences like the shared history of TM and TCM and to roughly outline the exchanging process between them. METHODS: Shared-use medicines in TM and TCM were listed alphabetically. Information on the scientific name, material name, medicinal parts, and medical efficacy were extracted from publications. Shared-use medicines were grouped according to medicinal properties and medicinal parts used by TM and TCM. The historical origin and current status of clinical prescriptions of shared-use medicines were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 136 shared-use medicines in TM and TCM were listed. Shared-use medicines that were used for a similar purpose in TM and TCM accounted for 14% of the total, while those used for different purposes accounted for 49% of the total, with some of the latter being commonly used in TCM. Shared-use medicinal herbs that originated from both Tibetan and Han regions accounted for 49% of the total, and those that were imported from South Asia and Southeast Asia were frequently observed in TM. CONCLUSION: Owing to its unique geographical location and cultural diversity, the Tibetan region played a role as a development cradle for various traditional medicinal theories and knowledge. Medicinal knowledge was exchanged between TM and TCM during their parallel independent growth. Shared-use medicines in TM and TCM were mostly determined by flora similarity and medicinal trade, and they marked significant differences in their medicinal properties. However, medicines that were used for similar purposes in TM and TCM presented obvious commercial medicinal characteristic as well as the same chemical profile. The Tibetan region not only provided medicinal usage knowledge of TCM, but also served as a supply of medicinal resources attributing to “high altitude” locations. BioMed Central 2019-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6706903/ /pubmed/31443668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-019-0320-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zhao, Ming-ming
Wang, Ke-ru
Gu, Rui
Zhong, Shi-hong
A comparative study on shared-use medicines in Tibetan and Chinese medicine
title A comparative study on shared-use medicines in Tibetan and Chinese medicine
title_full A comparative study on shared-use medicines in Tibetan and Chinese medicine
title_fullStr A comparative study on shared-use medicines in Tibetan and Chinese medicine
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study on shared-use medicines in Tibetan and Chinese medicine
title_short A comparative study on shared-use medicines in Tibetan and Chinese medicine
title_sort comparative study on shared-use medicines in tibetan and chinese medicine
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6706903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31443668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-019-0320-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaomingming acomparativestudyonsharedusemedicinesintibetanandchinesemedicine
AT wangkeru acomparativestudyonsharedusemedicinesintibetanandchinesemedicine
AT gurui acomparativestudyonsharedusemedicinesintibetanandchinesemedicine
AT zhongshihong acomparativestudyonsharedusemedicinesintibetanandchinesemedicine
AT zhaomingming comparativestudyonsharedusemedicinesintibetanandchinesemedicine
AT wangkeru comparativestudyonsharedusemedicinesintibetanandchinesemedicine
AT gurui comparativestudyonsharedusemedicinesintibetanandchinesemedicine
AT zhongshihong comparativestudyonsharedusemedicinesintibetanandchinesemedicine