Cargando…

Effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation on recurrent headaches in children aged 7–14 years, Protocol for a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Headache is one of the most common pain symptoms in childhood having a negative impact on many aspects of the lives of affected children, both short-term and long-term. Therefore, it is important to document safe and effective treatment options. Chiropractic spinal manipulation is a comm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lynge, Susanne, Hartvigsen, Jan, Christensen, Henrik Wulff, Vach, Werner, Hestbaek, Lise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6706934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0262-y
_version_ 1783445781580087296
author Lynge, Susanne
Hartvigsen, Jan
Christensen, Henrik Wulff
Vach, Werner
Hestbaek, Lise
author_facet Lynge, Susanne
Hartvigsen, Jan
Christensen, Henrik Wulff
Vach, Werner
Hestbaek, Lise
author_sort Lynge, Susanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Headache is one of the most common pain symptoms in childhood having a negative impact on many aspects of the lives of affected children, both short-term and long-term. Therefore, it is important to document safe and effective treatment options. Chiropractic spinal manipulation is a commonly used treatment option for these patients, although there are no randomized clinical trials documenting the effectiveness of this in pediatric headache. However, there is moderate evidence for effectiveness of spinal manipulation for adults with tension-type and cervicogenic headaches. This paper describes the protocol for a two-armed randomized superiority clinical trial aiming to investigate the effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation in the treatment of recurrent headache in children aged 7–14. METHODS: Children with weekly headaches for at least six months will be included if they have indications for chiropractic manipulation. The participants will be randomized to either chiropractic manipulation or sham manipulation. Both children and parents will be blinded for allocation. There will be 100 children in each arm and they will answer weekly text messages four weeks prior to treatment and during a four months treatment period. Potential primary outcomes are weekly number of headaches, intensity of headache, medication use and global perceived effect. Secondary outcomes include side-effects and headache status after one year. An initial outcome data analysis will be performed to inform the choice of primary outcome (adaptive design). Intervention effects will be reported as the difference in mean values between the two treatment arms, Cohen’s effect size and numbers needed to treat. DISCUSSION: A major strength of this study is its pragmatic nature, where the active treatment group receives chiropractic manipulation according to their individual needs, while both groups continue their use of medication for headache according to their pre-trial habits. Other strengths include an elaborate sham procedure and the weekly outcome reports, reducing recall bias. If it is possible to develop effective treatment for headache in children, a life course of recurring problems may be altered with potential positive implications for both individuals and society. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02684916. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12998-019-0262-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6706934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67069342019-08-28 Effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation on recurrent headaches in children aged 7–14 years, Protocol for a randomized clinical trial Lynge, Susanne Hartvigsen, Jan Christensen, Henrik Wulff Vach, Werner Hestbaek, Lise Chiropr Man Therap Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Headache is one of the most common pain symptoms in childhood having a negative impact on many aspects of the lives of affected children, both short-term and long-term. Therefore, it is important to document safe and effective treatment options. Chiropractic spinal manipulation is a commonly used treatment option for these patients, although there are no randomized clinical trials documenting the effectiveness of this in pediatric headache. However, there is moderate evidence for effectiveness of spinal manipulation for adults with tension-type and cervicogenic headaches. This paper describes the protocol for a two-armed randomized superiority clinical trial aiming to investigate the effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation in the treatment of recurrent headache in children aged 7–14. METHODS: Children with weekly headaches for at least six months will be included if they have indications for chiropractic manipulation. The participants will be randomized to either chiropractic manipulation or sham manipulation. Both children and parents will be blinded for allocation. There will be 100 children in each arm and they will answer weekly text messages four weeks prior to treatment and during a four months treatment period. Potential primary outcomes are weekly number of headaches, intensity of headache, medication use and global perceived effect. Secondary outcomes include side-effects and headache status after one year. An initial outcome data analysis will be performed to inform the choice of primary outcome (adaptive design). Intervention effects will be reported as the difference in mean values between the two treatment arms, Cohen’s effect size and numbers needed to treat. DISCUSSION: A major strength of this study is its pragmatic nature, where the active treatment group receives chiropractic manipulation according to their individual needs, while both groups continue their use of medication for headache according to their pre-trial habits. Other strengths include an elaborate sham procedure and the weekly outcome reports, reducing recall bias. If it is possible to develop effective treatment for headache in children, a life course of recurring problems may be altered with potential positive implications for both individuals and society. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02684916. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12998-019-0262-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6706934/ /pubmed/31462990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0262-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Lynge, Susanne
Hartvigsen, Jan
Christensen, Henrik Wulff
Vach, Werner
Hestbaek, Lise
Effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation on recurrent headaches in children aged 7–14 years, Protocol for a randomized clinical trial
title Effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation on recurrent headaches in children aged 7–14 years, Protocol for a randomized clinical trial
title_full Effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation on recurrent headaches in children aged 7–14 years, Protocol for a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation on recurrent headaches in children aged 7–14 years, Protocol for a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation on recurrent headaches in children aged 7–14 years, Protocol for a randomized clinical trial
title_short Effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation on recurrent headaches in children aged 7–14 years, Protocol for a randomized clinical trial
title_sort effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation on recurrent headaches in children aged 7–14 years, protocol for a randomized clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6706934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0262-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lyngesusanne effectivenessofchiropracticmanipulationversusshammanipulationonrecurrentheadachesinchildrenaged714yearsprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hartvigsenjan effectivenessofchiropracticmanipulationversusshammanipulationonrecurrentheadachesinchildrenaged714yearsprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT christensenhenrikwulff effectivenessofchiropracticmanipulationversusshammanipulationonrecurrentheadachesinchildrenaged714yearsprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT vachwerner effectivenessofchiropracticmanipulationversusshammanipulationonrecurrentheadachesinchildrenaged714yearsprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hestbaeklise effectivenessofchiropracticmanipulationversusshammanipulationonrecurrentheadachesinchildrenaged714yearsprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial