Cargando…

Expectation of reward differentially modulates executive inhibition

BACKGROUND: Inhibitory control, a key modulatory component of cognition guiding strategy and behaviour, can be affected by diverse contingencies. We explore here the effect of expectation of reward over behavioural adjustment in a Stop Signal Task modulated by reward. We hypothesize that cognitive c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herrera, Paula M., Van Meerbeke, Alberto Vélez, Speranza, Mario, Cabra, Claudia López, Bonilla, Mauricio, Canu, Michaël, Bekinschtein, Tristan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6706938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31443739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0332-x
_version_ 1783445782569943040
author Herrera, Paula M.
Van Meerbeke, Alberto Vélez
Speranza, Mario
Cabra, Claudia López
Bonilla, Mauricio
Canu, Michaël
Bekinschtein, Tristan A.
author_facet Herrera, Paula M.
Van Meerbeke, Alberto Vélez
Speranza, Mario
Cabra, Claudia López
Bonilla, Mauricio
Canu, Michaël
Bekinschtein, Tristan A.
author_sort Herrera, Paula M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inhibitory control, a key modulatory component of cognition guiding strategy and behaviour, can be affected by diverse contingencies. We explore here the effect of expectation of reward over behavioural adjustment in a Stop Signal Task modulated by reward. We hypothesize that cognitive control is modulated by different expectation of the reward. METHODS: Participants were allocated to two groups differing in their degree of knowledge in what to expect from rewards. Expected Specific Reward participants (N = 21) were informed of the different monetary feedbacks they would receive after each successful inhibition. Unexpected Reward participants (N = 24) were only told that they would receive monetary reward after correct inhibitory trials, but not the amounts or differences. RESULTS: Our results confirmed previous observations demonstrating a “kick-start effect” where a high reward feedback at the beginning of the task increases response inhibition. The Expected Specific Reward condition seems also to improve inhibitory control -as measured by the stop signal reaction time (SSRT)-, compared to the Unexpected Reward group. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of reward magnitudes seems to play a role in cognitive control irrespective of feedback magnitude. The manipulation of reward expectation appears to trigger different strategies for cognitive control, inducing a bottom-up effect of external cues, or a top-down effect given by the anticipation of incoming rewards. This is an early exploration to unearth possible higher order modulators - expectation and motivation- of cognitive control. This approach aims to gain insight into diverse psychopathological conditions related to impulsivity and altered reward systems such as Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD), personality disorders, substance abuse, pathological gambling and cognitive aspects of Parkinson Disease. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40359-019-0332-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6706938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67069382019-08-28 Expectation of reward differentially modulates executive inhibition Herrera, Paula M. Van Meerbeke, Alberto Vélez Speranza, Mario Cabra, Claudia López Bonilla, Mauricio Canu, Michaël Bekinschtein, Tristan A. BMC Psychol Research Article BACKGROUND: Inhibitory control, a key modulatory component of cognition guiding strategy and behaviour, can be affected by diverse contingencies. We explore here the effect of expectation of reward over behavioural adjustment in a Stop Signal Task modulated by reward. We hypothesize that cognitive control is modulated by different expectation of the reward. METHODS: Participants were allocated to two groups differing in their degree of knowledge in what to expect from rewards. Expected Specific Reward participants (N = 21) were informed of the different monetary feedbacks they would receive after each successful inhibition. Unexpected Reward participants (N = 24) were only told that they would receive monetary reward after correct inhibitory trials, but not the amounts or differences. RESULTS: Our results confirmed previous observations demonstrating a “kick-start effect” where a high reward feedback at the beginning of the task increases response inhibition. The Expected Specific Reward condition seems also to improve inhibitory control -as measured by the stop signal reaction time (SSRT)-, compared to the Unexpected Reward group. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of reward magnitudes seems to play a role in cognitive control irrespective of feedback magnitude. The manipulation of reward expectation appears to trigger different strategies for cognitive control, inducing a bottom-up effect of external cues, or a top-down effect given by the anticipation of incoming rewards. This is an early exploration to unearth possible higher order modulators - expectation and motivation- of cognitive control. This approach aims to gain insight into diverse psychopathological conditions related to impulsivity and altered reward systems such as Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD), personality disorders, substance abuse, pathological gambling and cognitive aspects of Parkinson Disease. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40359-019-0332-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6706938/ /pubmed/31443739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0332-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Herrera, Paula M.
Van Meerbeke, Alberto Vélez
Speranza, Mario
Cabra, Claudia López
Bonilla, Mauricio
Canu, Michaël
Bekinschtein, Tristan A.
Expectation of reward differentially modulates executive inhibition
title Expectation of reward differentially modulates executive inhibition
title_full Expectation of reward differentially modulates executive inhibition
title_fullStr Expectation of reward differentially modulates executive inhibition
title_full_unstemmed Expectation of reward differentially modulates executive inhibition
title_short Expectation of reward differentially modulates executive inhibition
title_sort expectation of reward differentially modulates executive inhibition
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6706938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31443739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0332-x
work_keys_str_mv AT herrerapaulam expectationofrewarddifferentiallymodulatesexecutiveinhibition
AT vanmeerbekealbertovelez expectationofrewarddifferentiallymodulatesexecutiveinhibition
AT speranzamario expectationofrewarddifferentiallymodulatesexecutiveinhibition
AT cabraclaudialopez expectationofrewarddifferentiallymodulatesexecutiveinhibition
AT bonillamauricio expectationofrewarddifferentiallymodulatesexecutiveinhibition
AT canumichael expectationofrewarddifferentiallymodulatesexecutiveinhibition
AT bekinschteintristana expectationofrewarddifferentiallymodulatesexecutiveinhibition