Cargando…

The Effect of Critical Shoulder Angle on Clinical Scores and Retear Risk After Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair at Short-term Follow Up

The authors aimed to investigate whether standard acromioplasty can reduce critical shoulder angle (CSA) effectively and to investigate the effects of postoperative CSA on the clinical outcomes and retear rates. Patients are divided in to three groups: group 1 (24 patients): CSA under 35° before sur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gürpınar, Tahsin, Polat, Barış, Çarkçı, Engin, Eren, Murat, Polat, Ayşe Esin, Öztürkmen, Yusuf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6707178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31444365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48644-w
_version_ 1783445821049536512
author Gürpınar, Tahsin
Polat, Barış
Çarkçı, Engin
Eren, Murat
Polat, Ayşe Esin
Öztürkmen, Yusuf
author_facet Gürpınar, Tahsin
Polat, Barış
Çarkçı, Engin
Eren, Murat
Polat, Ayşe Esin
Öztürkmen, Yusuf
author_sort Gürpınar, Tahsin
collection PubMed
description The authors aimed to investigate whether standard acromioplasty can reduce critical shoulder angle (CSA) effectively and to investigate the effects of postoperative CSA on the clinical outcomes and retear rates. Patients are divided in to three groups: group 1 (24 patients): CSA under 35° before surgery, group 2 (25 patients): CSA over 35° before surgery and under 35° after surgery and group 3 (17 patients): CSA over 35° before and after surgery. Standard acromioplasty was performed if CSA is over 35 and no acromioplasty was performed if the CSA is already under 35. Preoperative and postoperative CSAs, UCLA, Constant-Murley clinical score and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were measured. The size of the rotator cuff tear was classified by the Patte classification in preoperative MRI and the quality of the repair was evaluated as retear if discontinuity detected in the postoperative first year MRI. There were 31 female and 35 male patients with a mean age of 59.3 ± 4.5 years (range, 48–68) at the time of surgery. The mean CSA is reduced from 37.8° ± 1.4 to 34.9° ± 1.2 (p < 0.001) significantly for patients who underwent acromioplasty. In 25 (59.5%) of the 42 patients, the CSA was reduced to under 35°, whereas in the other 17 (40.5%) patients, it remained over 35°. The mean Constant and UCLA score was 46.4 ± 6.6; 18.5 ± 1.6 preoperatively and 82.4 ± 6.2; 31.1 ± 1.9 postoperatively respectively (p < 0,001). The mean VAS decreased from 4.94 ± 1.09 to 0.79 ± 0.71 (p < 0.001). No Clinical difference was seen between patients in which CSA could be reduced under 35° or not in terms of Constant-Murley score, UCLA and VAS score. Retear was observed in 2 (8.3%) patients in group 1, in 4 (16%) patients in group 2 and in 3 patients (17.6%) in group 3. There was not any significant difference between the patients who had retear or not in terms of neither the CSA values nor the change of CSA after the surgery. Standard acromioplasty, which consists of an anterolateral acromial resection, can reduce CSA by approximately 3°. This is not always sufficient to decrease the CSAs to the favorable range of 30°–35°. In addition, its effect on clinical outcomes does not seem to be noteworthy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6707178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67071782019-09-08 The Effect of Critical Shoulder Angle on Clinical Scores and Retear Risk After Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair at Short-term Follow Up Gürpınar, Tahsin Polat, Barış Çarkçı, Engin Eren, Murat Polat, Ayşe Esin Öztürkmen, Yusuf Sci Rep Article The authors aimed to investigate whether standard acromioplasty can reduce critical shoulder angle (CSA) effectively and to investigate the effects of postoperative CSA on the clinical outcomes and retear rates. Patients are divided in to three groups: group 1 (24 patients): CSA under 35° before surgery, group 2 (25 patients): CSA over 35° before surgery and under 35° after surgery and group 3 (17 patients): CSA over 35° before and after surgery. Standard acromioplasty was performed if CSA is over 35 and no acromioplasty was performed if the CSA is already under 35. Preoperative and postoperative CSAs, UCLA, Constant-Murley clinical score and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were measured. The size of the rotator cuff tear was classified by the Patte classification in preoperative MRI and the quality of the repair was evaluated as retear if discontinuity detected in the postoperative first year MRI. There were 31 female and 35 male patients with a mean age of 59.3 ± 4.5 years (range, 48–68) at the time of surgery. The mean CSA is reduced from 37.8° ± 1.4 to 34.9° ± 1.2 (p < 0.001) significantly for patients who underwent acromioplasty. In 25 (59.5%) of the 42 patients, the CSA was reduced to under 35°, whereas in the other 17 (40.5%) patients, it remained over 35°. The mean Constant and UCLA score was 46.4 ± 6.6; 18.5 ± 1.6 preoperatively and 82.4 ± 6.2; 31.1 ± 1.9 postoperatively respectively (p < 0,001). The mean VAS decreased from 4.94 ± 1.09 to 0.79 ± 0.71 (p < 0.001). No Clinical difference was seen between patients in which CSA could be reduced under 35° or not in terms of Constant-Murley score, UCLA and VAS score. Retear was observed in 2 (8.3%) patients in group 1, in 4 (16%) patients in group 2 and in 3 patients (17.6%) in group 3. There was not any significant difference between the patients who had retear or not in terms of neither the CSA values nor the change of CSA after the surgery. Standard acromioplasty, which consists of an anterolateral acromial resection, can reduce CSA by approximately 3°. This is not always sufficient to decrease the CSAs to the favorable range of 30°–35°. In addition, its effect on clinical outcomes does not seem to be noteworthy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6707178/ /pubmed/31444365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48644-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Gürpınar, Tahsin
Polat, Barış
Çarkçı, Engin
Eren, Murat
Polat, Ayşe Esin
Öztürkmen, Yusuf
The Effect of Critical Shoulder Angle on Clinical Scores and Retear Risk After Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair at Short-term Follow Up
title The Effect of Critical Shoulder Angle on Clinical Scores and Retear Risk After Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair at Short-term Follow Up
title_full The Effect of Critical Shoulder Angle on Clinical Scores and Retear Risk After Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair at Short-term Follow Up
title_fullStr The Effect of Critical Shoulder Angle on Clinical Scores and Retear Risk After Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair at Short-term Follow Up
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Critical Shoulder Angle on Clinical Scores and Retear Risk After Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair at Short-term Follow Up
title_short The Effect of Critical Shoulder Angle on Clinical Scores and Retear Risk After Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair at Short-term Follow Up
title_sort effect of critical shoulder angle on clinical scores and retear risk after rotator cuff tendon repair at short-term follow up
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6707178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31444365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48644-w
work_keys_str_mv AT gurpınartahsin theeffectofcriticalshoulderangleonclinicalscoresandretearriskafterrotatorcufftendonrepairatshorttermfollowup
AT polatbarıs theeffectofcriticalshoulderangleonclinicalscoresandretearriskafterrotatorcufftendonrepairatshorttermfollowup
AT carkcıengin theeffectofcriticalshoulderangleonclinicalscoresandretearriskafterrotatorcufftendonrepairatshorttermfollowup
AT erenmurat theeffectofcriticalshoulderangleonclinicalscoresandretearriskafterrotatorcufftendonrepairatshorttermfollowup
AT polatayseesin theeffectofcriticalshoulderangleonclinicalscoresandretearriskafterrotatorcufftendonrepairatshorttermfollowup
AT ozturkmenyusuf theeffectofcriticalshoulderangleonclinicalscoresandretearriskafterrotatorcufftendonrepairatshorttermfollowup
AT gurpınartahsin effectofcriticalshoulderangleonclinicalscoresandretearriskafterrotatorcufftendonrepairatshorttermfollowup
AT polatbarıs effectofcriticalshoulderangleonclinicalscoresandretearriskafterrotatorcufftendonrepairatshorttermfollowup
AT carkcıengin effectofcriticalshoulderangleonclinicalscoresandretearriskafterrotatorcufftendonrepairatshorttermfollowup
AT erenmurat effectofcriticalshoulderangleonclinicalscoresandretearriskafterrotatorcufftendonrepairatshorttermfollowup
AT polatayseesin effectofcriticalshoulderangleonclinicalscoresandretearriskafterrotatorcufftendonrepairatshorttermfollowup
AT ozturkmenyusuf effectofcriticalshoulderangleonclinicalscoresandretearriskafterrotatorcufftendonrepairatshorttermfollowup