Cargando…
Deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing
It has been proposed that poor reading abilities in deaf readers might be related to weak connections between the orthographic and lexical-semantic levels of processing. Here we used event related potentials (ERPs), known for their excellent time resolution, to examine whether lexical feedback modul...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6707270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31444497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48702-3 |
_version_ | 1783445834554146816 |
---|---|
author | Gutierrez-Sigut, Eva Vergara-Martínez, Marta Perea, Manuel |
author_facet | Gutierrez-Sigut, Eva Vergara-Martínez, Marta Perea, Manuel |
author_sort | Gutierrez-Sigut, Eva |
collection | PubMed |
description | It has been proposed that poor reading abilities in deaf readers might be related to weak connections between the orthographic and lexical-semantic levels of processing. Here we used event related potentials (ERPs), known for their excellent time resolution, to examine whether lexical feedback modulates early orthographic processing. Twenty congenitally deaf readers made lexical decisions to target words and pseudowords. Each of those target stimuli could be preceded by a briefly presented matched-case or mismatched-case identity prime (e.g., ALTAR-ALTAR vs. altar- ALTAR). Results showed an early effect of case overlap at the N/P150 for all targets. Critically, this effect disappeared for words but not for pseudowords, at the N250—an ERP component sensitive to orthographic processing. This dissociation in the effect of case for word and pseudowords targets provides strong evidence of early automatic lexical-semantic feedback modulating orthographic processing in deaf readers. Interestingly, despite the dissociation found in the ERP data, behavioural responses to words still benefited from the physical overlap between prime and target, particularly in less skilled readers and those with less experience with words. Overall, our results support the idea that skilled deaf readers have a stronger connection between the orthographic and the lexical-semantic levels of processing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6707270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67072702019-09-08 Deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing Gutierrez-Sigut, Eva Vergara-Martínez, Marta Perea, Manuel Sci Rep Article It has been proposed that poor reading abilities in deaf readers might be related to weak connections between the orthographic and lexical-semantic levels of processing. Here we used event related potentials (ERPs), known for their excellent time resolution, to examine whether lexical feedback modulates early orthographic processing. Twenty congenitally deaf readers made lexical decisions to target words and pseudowords. Each of those target stimuli could be preceded by a briefly presented matched-case or mismatched-case identity prime (e.g., ALTAR-ALTAR vs. altar- ALTAR). Results showed an early effect of case overlap at the N/P150 for all targets. Critically, this effect disappeared for words but not for pseudowords, at the N250—an ERP component sensitive to orthographic processing. This dissociation in the effect of case for word and pseudowords targets provides strong evidence of early automatic lexical-semantic feedback modulating orthographic processing in deaf readers. Interestingly, despite the dissociation found in the ERP data, behavioural responses to words still benefited from the physical overlap between prime and target, particularly in less skilled readers and those with less experience with words. Overall, our results support the idea that skilled deaf readers have a stronger connection between the orthographic and the lexical-semantic levels of processing. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6707270/ /pubmed/31444497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48702-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Gutierrez-Sigut, Eva Vergara-Martínez, Marta Perea, Manuel Deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing |
title | Deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing |
title_full | Deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing |
title_fullStr | Deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing |
title_full_unstemmed | Deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing |
title_short | Deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing |
title_sort | deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6707270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31444497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48702-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gutierrezsiguteva deafreadersbenefitfromlexicalfeedbackduringorthographicprocessing AT vergaramartinezmarta deafreadersbenefitfromlexicalfeedbackduringorthographicprocessing AT pereamanuel deafreadersbenefitfromlexicalfeedbackduringorthographicprocessing |