Cargando…
Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in Iran
Reject analysis is as a quality indicator and critical tool for dose and image quality optimization in radiology departments. By reducing image rejection rate (RR), radiation dose to patients can be reduced effectively, yielding increased total cost-effectiveness. The aims of this study were to asse...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iran University of Medical Sciences
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31456973 http://dx.doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.33.49 |
_version_ | 1783445950297014272 |
---|---|
author | Rastegar, Sajjad Beigi, Jalal Saeidi, Ehsan Dezhkam, Ali Mobaderi, Tofigh Ghaffari, Hamed Mehdipour, Ali Abdollahi, Hamid |
author_facet | Rastegar, Sajjad Beigi, Jalal Saeidi, Ehsan Dezhkam, Ali Mobaderi, Tofigh Ghaffari, Hamed Mehdipour, Ali Abdollahi, Hamid |
author_sort | Rastegar, Sajjad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reject analysis is as a quality indicator and critical tool for dose and image quality optimization in radiology departments. By reducing image rejection rate (RR), radiation dose to patients can be reduced effectively, yielding increased total cost-effectiveness. The aims of this study were to assess the rate of image rejection at 2 direct digital radiography (DR) departments to find the sources of rejection and to observe how radiology students and radiographers deal with image rejection. Two radiology departments were surveyed during a 3-month period for all imaging procedures. Type of examination, numbers, and reasons for digital image rejection were obtained by systems and questionnaire. A predefined questionnaire, including 13 causes for rejection, was filled by radiographers and students. Out of the 14 022 acquired images, 1116 were rejected, yielding an overall RR of 8%. Highest RRs were found for examination of cervical spine and lumbosacral. Positioning errors and improper patient preparation were the main reasons for digital image rejection. The image RR was small, but there is a need for optimizing radiographic practice, and enhancing radiographer’s knowledge may enhance the performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6708103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Iran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67081032019-08-27 Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in Iran Rastegar, Sajjad Beigi, Jalal Saeidi, Ehsan Dezhkam, Ali Mobaderi, Tofigh Ghaffari, Hamed Mehdipour, Ali Abdollahi, Hamid Med J Islam Repub Iran Brief Communication Reject analysis is as a quality indicator and critical tool for dose and image quality optimization in radiology departments. By reducing image rejection rate (RR), radiation dose to patients can be reduced effectively, yielding increased total cost-effectiveness. The aims of this study were to assess the rate of image rejection at 2 direct digital radiography (DR) departments to find the sources of rejection and to observe how radiology students and radiographers deal with image rejection. Two radiology departments were surveyed during a 3-month period for all imaging procedures. Type of examination, numbers, and reasons for digital image rejection were obtained by systems and questionnaire. A predefined questionnaire, including 13 causes for rejection, was filled by radiographers and students. Out of the 14 022 acquired images, 1116 were rejected, yielding an overall RR of 8%. Highest RRs were found for examination of cervical spine and lumbosacral. Positioning errors and improper patient preparation were the main reasons for digital image rejection. The image RR was small, but there is a need for optimizing radiographic practice, and enhancing radiographer’s knowledge may enhance the performance. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2019-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6708103/ /pubmed/31456973 http://dx.doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.33.49 Text en © 2019 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-ShareAlike 1.0 License (CC BY-NC-SA 1.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Rastegar, Sajjad Beigi, Jalal Saeidi, Ehsan Dezhkam, Ali Mobaderi, Tofigh Ghaffari, Hamed Mehdipour, Ali Abdollahi, Hamid Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in Iran |
title | Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in Iran |
title_full | Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in Iran |
title_fullStr | Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in Iran |
title_full_unstemmed | Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in Iran |
title_short | Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in Iran |
title_sort | reject analysis in digital radiography: a local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in iran |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31456973 http://dx.doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.33.49 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rastegarsajjad rejectanalysisindigitalradiographyalocalstudyonradiographersandstudentsattitudeiniran AT beigijalal rejectanalysisindigitalradiographyalocalstudyonradiographersandstudentsattitudeiniran AT saeidiehsan rejectanalysisindigitalradiographyalocalstudyonradiographersandstudentsattitudeiniran AT dezhkamali rejectanalysisindigitalradiographyalocalstudyonradiographersandstudentsattitudeiniran AT mobaderitofigh rejectanalysisindigitalradiographyalocalstudyonradiographersandstudentsattitudeiniran AT ghaffarihamed rejectanalysisindigitalradiographyalocalstudyonradiographersandstudentsattitudeiniran AT mehdipourali rejectanalysisindigitalradiographyalocalstudyonradiographersandstudentsattitudeiniran AT abdollahihamid rejectanalysisindigitalradiographyalocalstudyonradiographersandstudentsattitudeiniran |