Cargando…

Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in Iran

Reject analysis is as a quality indicator and critical tool for dose and image quality optimization in radiology departments. By reducing image rejection rate (RR), radiation dose to patients can be reduced effectively, yielding increased total cost-effectiveness. The aims of this study were to asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rastegar, Sajjad, Beigi, Jalal, Saeidi, Ehsan, Dezhkam, Ali, Mobaderi, Tofigh, Ghaffari, Hamed, Mehdipour, Ali, Abdollahi, Hamid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31456973
http://dx.doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.33.49
_version_ 1783445950297014272
author Rastegar, Sajjad
Beigi, Jalal
Saeidi, Ehsan
Dezhkam, Ali
Mobaderi, Tofigh
Ghaffari, Hamed
Mehdipour, Ali
Abdollahi, Hamid
author_facet Rastegar, Sajjad
Beigi, Jalal
Saeidi, Ehsan
Dezhkam, Ali
Mobaderi, Tofigh
Ghaffari, Hamed
Mehdipour, Ali
Abdollahi, Hamid
author_sort Rastegar, Sajjad
collection PubMed
description Reject analysis is as a quality indicator and critical tool for dose and image quality optimization in radiology departments. By reducing image rejection rate (RR), radiation dose to patients can be reduced effectively, yielding increased total cost-effectiveness. The aims of this study were to assess the rate of image rejection at 2 direct digital radiography (DR) departments to find the sources of rejection and to observe how radiology students and radiographers deal with image rejection. Two radiology departments were surveyed during a 3-month period for all imaging procedures. Type of examination, numbers, and reasons for digital image rejection were obtained by systems and questionnaire. A predefined questionnaire, including 13 causes for rejection, was filled by radiographers and students. Out of the 14 022 acquired images, 1116 were rejected, yielding an overall RR of 8%. Highest RRs were found for examination of cervical spine and lumbosacral. Positioning errors and improper patient preparation were the main reasons for digital image rejection. The image RR was small, but there is a need for optimizing radiographic practice, and enhancing radiographer’s knowledge may enhance the performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6708103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67081032019-08-27 Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in Iran Rastegar, Sajjad Beigi, Jalal Saeidi, Ehsan Dezhkam, Ali Mobaderi, Tofigh Ghaffari, Hamed Mehdipour, Ali Abdollahi, Hamid Med J Islam Repub Iran Brief Communication Reject analysis is as a quality indicator and critical tool for dose and image quality optimization in radiology departments. By reducing image rejection rate (RR), radiation dose to patients can be reduced effectively, yielding increased total cost-effectiveness. The aims of this study were to assess the rate of image rejection at 2 direct digital radiography (DR) departments to find the sources of rejection and to observe how radiology students and radiographers deal with image rejection. Two radiology departments were surveyed during a 3-month period for all imaging procedures. Type of examination, numbers, and reasons for digital image rejection were obtained by systems and questionnaire. A predefined questionnaire, including 13 causes for rejection, was filled by radiographers and students. Out of the 14 022 acquired images, 1116 were rejected, yielding an overall RR of 8%. Highest RRs were found for examination of cervical spine and lumbosacral. Positioning errors and improper patient preparation were the main reasons for digital image rejection. The image RR was small, but there is a need for optimizing radiographic practice, and enhancing radiographer’s knowledge may enhance the performance. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2019-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6708103/ /pubmed/31456973 http://dx.doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.33.49 Text en © 2019 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-ShareAlike 1.0 License (CC BY-NC-SA 1.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Rastegar, Sajjad
Beigi, Jalal
Saeidi, Ehsan
Dezhkam, Ali
Mobaderi, Tofigh
Ghaffari, Hamed
Mehdipour, Ali
Abdollahi, Hamid
Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in Iran
title Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in Iran
title_full Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in Iran
title_fullStr Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in Iran
title_full_unstemmed Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in Iran
title_short Reject analysis in digital radiography: A local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in Iran
title_sort reject analysis in digital radiography: a local study on radiographers and students’ attitude in iran
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31456973
http://dx.doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.33.49
work_keys_str_mv AT rastegarsajjad rejectanalysisindigitalradiographyalocalstudyonradiographersandstudentsattitudeiniran
AT beigijalal rejectanalysisindigitalradiographyalocalstudyonradiographersandstudentsattitudeiniran
AT saeidiehsan rejectanalysisindigitalradiographyalocalstudyonradiographersandstudentsattitudeiniran
AT dezhkamali rejectanalysisindigitalradiographyalocalstudyonradiographersandstudentsattitudeiniran
AT mobaderitofigh rejectanalysisindigitalradiographyalocalstudyonradiographersandstudentsattitudeiniran
AT ghaffarihamed rejectanalysisindigitalradiographyalocalstudyonradiographersandstudentsattitudeiniran
AT mehdipourali rejectanalysisindigitalradiographyalocalstudyonradiographersandstudentsattitudeiniran
AT abdollahihamid rejectanalysisindigitalradiographyalocalstudyonradiographersandstudentsattitudeiniran