Cargando…

Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Predicting which patients with hip osteoarthritis are more likely to show disease progression is important for healthcare professionals. Therefore, the aim of this review was to assess which factors are predictive of progression in patients with hip osteoarthritis. METHODS: A literature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teirlinck, C. H., Dorleijn, D. M. J., Bos, P. K., Rijkels-Otters, J. B. M., Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A., Luijsterburg, P. A. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31443685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1969-9
_version_ 1783445954992537600
author Teirlinck, C. H.
Dorleijn, D. M. J.
Bos, P. K.
Rijkels-Otters, J. B. M.
Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A.
Luijsterburg, P. A. J.
author_facet Teirlinck, C. H.
Dorleijn, D. M. J.
Bos, P. K.
Rijkels-Otters, J. B. M.
Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A.
Luijsterburg, P. A. J.
author_sort Teirlinck, C. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Predicting which patients with hip osteoarthritis are more likely to show disease progression is important for healthcare professionals. Therefore, the aim of this review was to assess which factors are predictive of progression in patients with hip osteoarthritis. METHODS: A literature search was made up until 14 March 2019. Included were cohort and case-control studies evaluating the association between factors and progression (either clinical, radiological, or THR). Excluded were studies with a follow-up < 1 year or specific underlying pathologies of osteoarthritis. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS tool. A best-evidence synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: We included 57 articles describing 154 different factors. Of these, a best-evidence synthesis was possible for 103 factors, separately for clinical and radiological progression, and progression to total hip replacement. We found strong evidence for more clinical progression in patients with comorbidity and more progression to total hip replacement for a higher Kellgren and Lawrence grade, superior or (supero) lateral femoral head migration, and subchondral sclerosis. Strong evidence for no association was found regarding clinical progression for gender, social support, pain medication, quality of life, and limited range of motion of internal rotation or external rotation. Also, strong evidence for no association was found regarding radiological progression for the markers CTX-I, COMP, NTX-I, PINP, and PIIINP and regarding progression to total hip replacement for body mass index. CONCLUSION: Strong evidence suggested that 4 factors were predictive of progression of hip osteoarthritis, whereas 12 factors were not predictive of progression. Evidence for most of the reported factors was either limited or conflicting. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42015010757 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1969-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6708123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67081232019-08-28 Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review Teirlinck, C. H. Dorleijn, D. M. J. Bos, P. K. Rijkels-Otters, J. B. M. Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A. Luijsterburg, P. A. J. Arthritis Res Ther Review BACKGROUND: Predicting which patients with hip osteoarthritis are more likely to show disease progression is important for healthcare professionals. Therefore, the aim of this review was to assess which factors are predictive of progression in patients with hip osteoarthritis. METHODS: A literature search was made up until 14 March 2019. Included were cohort and case-control studies evaluating the association between factors and progression (either clinical, radiological, or THR). Excluded were studies with a follow-up < 1 year or specific underlying pathologies of osteoarthritis. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS tool. A best-evidence synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: We included 57 articles describing 154 different factors. Of these, a best-evidence synthesis was possible for 103 factors, separately for clinical and radiological progression, and progression to total hip replacement. We found strong evidence for more clinical progression in patients with comorbidity and more progression to total hip replacement for a higher Kellgren and Lawrence grade, superior or (supero) lateral femoral head migration, and subchondral sclerosis. Strong evidence for no association was found regarding clinical progression for gender, social support, pain medication, quality of life, and limited range of motion of internal rotation or external rotation. Also, strong evidence for no association was found regarding radiological progression for the markers CTX-I, COMP, NTX-I, PINP, and PIIINP and regarding progression to total hip replacement for body mass index. CONCLUSION: Strong evidence suggested that 4 factors were predictive of progression of hip osteoarthritis, whereas 12 factors were not predictive of progression. Evidence for most of the reported factors was either limited or conflicting. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42015010757 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1969-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-23 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6708123/ /pubmed/31443685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1969-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Teirlinck, C. H.
Dorleijn, D. M. J.
Bos, P. K.
Rijkels-Otters, J. B. M.
Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A.
Luijsterburg, P. A. J.
Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review
title Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review
title_full Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review
title_fullStr Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review
title_short Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review
title_sort prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31443685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1969-9
work_keys_str_mv AT teirlinckch prognosticfactorsforprogressionofosteoarthritisofthehipasystematicreview
AT dorleijndmj prognosticfactorsforprogressionofosteoarthritisofthehipasystematicreview
AT bospk prognosticfactorsforprogressionofosteoarthritisofthehipasystematicreview
AT rijkelsottersjbm prognosticfactorsforprogressionofosteoarthritisofthehipasystematicreview
AT biermazeinstrasma prognosticfactorsforprogressionofosteoarthritisofthehipasystematicreview
AT luijsterburgpaj prognosticfactorsforprogressionofosteoarthritisofthehipasystematicreview