Cargando…

Utilization of Laparoscopic Colon Surgery in the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF)

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has become the standard of care for the most common surgical procedures performed. However, laparoscopic techniques have not reached this same penetrance in colorectal surgery. We wanted to determine the percentage of colon operations performed in Texas that were don...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clapp, Benjamin, Klingsporn, William, Harper, Brittany, Swinney, Ira L., Dodoo, Christopher, Davis, Brian, Tyroch, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488941
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2019.00032
_version_ 1783446005920825344
author Clapp, Benjamin
Klingsporn, William
Harper, Brittany
Swinney, Ira L.
Dodoo, Christopher
Davis, Brian
Tyroch, Alan
author_facet Clapp, Benjamin
Klingsporn, William
Harper, Brittany
Swinney, Ira L.
Dodoo, Christopher
Davis, Brian
Tyroch, Alan
author_sort Clapp, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has become the standard of care for the most common surgical procedures performed. However, laparoscopic techniques have not reached this same penetrance in colorectal surgery. We wanted to determine the percentage of colon operations performed in Texas that were done via laparoscopic, robotic and open techniques. METHODS: The Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF) was queried using ICD-9-CM diagnostic and procedure codes to determine overall utilization of laparoscopic colectomies (LC) in Texas between 2013-14 for reporting facilities. We specifically looked at cost and the length of stay for LC, open colectomy (OC) and robotic assisted colectomy (RAC). RESULTS: In the state of Texas between 2013-14 there were 20,454 colectomies performed. Of these 12,328 (60.3%) were OC, 7,536 (36.8%) were LC, and 590 (3.9%) were RAC. Average total cost was $117,113 for OC, $75,741.9 for LC, and $81,996.2 for RAC. Average length of stay for each technique was 10.6 days for OC, 6.1 days for LC, and 5.1 days for RAC. The risk of a postoperative complication occurring was higher in the open procedure than a laparoscopic procedure. CONCLUSIONS: LC accounted for only 36.8% of all colectomies performed in Texas between 2013-14. OC costs twice as much as LC and increased the length of stay by nearly 4 d. LC and RAC are both associated with significantly less cost and length of stay for patients undergoing surgery, while lowering perioperative complications. DISCLOSURES: None of the authors have any relevant disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6708411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67084112019-09-05 Utilization of Laparoscopic Colon Surgery in the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF) Clapp, Benjamin Klingsporn, William Harper, Brittany Swinney, Ira L. Dodoo, Christopher Davis, Brian Tyroch, Alan JSLS Research Article BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has become the standard of care for the most common surgical procedures performed. However, laparoscopic techniques have not reached this same penetrance in colorectal surgery. We wanted to determine the percentage of colon operations performed in Texas that were done via laparoscopic, robotic and open techniques. METHODS: The Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF) was queried using ICD-9-CM diagnostic and procedure codes to determine overall utilization of laparoscopic colectomies (LC) in Texas between 2013-14 for reporting facilities. We specifically looked at cost and the length of stay for LC, open colectomy (OC) and robotic assisted colectomy (RAC). RESULTS: In the state of Texas between 2013-14 there were 20,454 colectomies performed. Of these 12,328 (60.3%) were OC, 7,536 (36.8%) were LC, and 590 (3.9%) were RAC. Average total cost was $117,113 for OC, $75,741.9 for LC, and $81,996.2 for RAC. Average length of stay for each technique was 10.6 days for OC, 6.1 days for LC, and 5.1 days for RAC. The risk of a postoperative complication occurring was higher in the open procedure than a laparoscopic procedure. CONCLUSIONS: LC accounted for only 36.8% of all colectomies performed in Texas between 2013-14. OC costs twice as much as LC and increased the length of stay by nearly 4 d. LC and RAC are both associated with significantly less cost and length of stay for patients undergoing surgery, while lowering perioperative complications. DISCLOSURES: None of the authors have any relevant disclosures. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6708411/ /pubmed/31488941 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2019.00032 Text en © 2019 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Research Article
Clapp, Benjamin
Klingsporn, William
Harper, Brittany
Swinney, Ira L.
Dodoo, Christopher
Davis, Brian
Tyroch, Alan
Utilization of Laparoscopic Colon Surgery in the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF)
title Utilization of Laparoscopic Colon Surgery in the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF)
title_full Utilization of Laparoscopic Colon Surgery in the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF)
title_fullStr Utilization of Laparoscopic Colon Surgery in the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF)
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of Laparoscopic Colon Surgery in the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF)
title_short Utilization of Laparoscopic Colon Surgery in the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF)
title_sort utilization of laparoscopic colon surgery in the texas inpatient public use data file (pudf)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488941
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2019.00032
work_keys_str_mv AT clappbenjamin utilizationoflaparoscopiccolonsurgeryinthetexasinpatientpublicusedatafilepudf
AT klingspornwilliam utilizationoflaparoscopiccolonsurgeryinthetexasinpatientpublicusedatafilepudf
AT harperbrittany utilizationoflaparoscopiccolonsurgeryinthetexasinpatientpublicusedatafilepudf
AT swinneyiral utilizationoflaparoscopiccolonsurgeryinthetexasinpatientpublicusedatafilepudf
AT dodoochristopher utilizationoflaparoscopiccolonsurgeryinthetexasinpatientpublicusedatafilepudf
AT davisbrian utilizationoflaparoscopiccolonsurgeryinthetexasinpatientpublicusedatafilepudf
AT tyrochalan utilizationoflaparoscopiccolonsurgeryinthetexasinpatientpublicusedatafilepudf