Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is a promising diagnostic imaging tool for the diagnosis of dementia, as PET can add complementary information to the routine imaging examination with MRI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of MRI-bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Øen, Silje Kjærnes, Keil, Thomas Morten, Berntsen, Erik Magnus, Aanerud, Joel Fredrik, Schwarzlmüller, Thomas, Ladefoged, Claes Nøhr, Karlberg, Anna Maria, Eikenes, Live
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Original Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31446507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0553-2
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is a promising diagnostic imaging tool for the diagnosis of dementia, as PET can add complementary information to the routine imaging examination with MRI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of MRI-based attenuation correction (MRAC) on diagnostic assessment of dementia with [(18)F]FDG PET. Quantitative differences in both [(18)F]FDG uptake and z-scores were calculated for three clinically available (DixonNoBone, DixonBone, UTE) and two research MRAC methods (UCL, DeepUTE) compared to CT-based AC (CTAC). Furthermore, diagnoses based on visual evaluations were made by three nuclear medicine physicians and one neuroradiologist (PET(CT), PET(DeepUTE), PET(DixonBone), PET(UTE), PET(CT) + MRI, PET(DixonBone) + MRI). In addition, pons and cerebellum were compared as reference regions for normalization. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference in z-scores were smallest between MRAC and CTAC with cerebellum as reference region: 0.15 ± 0.11 σ (DeepUTE), 0.15 ± 0.12 σ (UCL), 0.23 ± 0.20 σ (DixonBone), 0.32 ± 0.28 σ (DixonNoBone), and 0.54 ± 0.40 σ (UTE). In the visual evaluation, the diagnoses agreed with PET(CT) in 74% (PET(DeepUTE)), 67% (PET(DixonBone)), and 70% (PET(UTE)) of the patients, while PET(CT) + MRI agreed with PET(DixonBone) + MRI in 89% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The MRAC research methods performed close to that of CTAC in the quantitative evaluation of [(18)F]FDG uptake and z-scores. Among the clinically implemented MRAC methods, Dixon(Bone) should be preferred for diagnostic assessment of dementia with [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI. However, as artifacts occur in Dixon(Bone) attenuation maps, they must be visually inspected to assure proper quantification. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-019-0553-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Ejemplares similares