Cargando…
Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia
BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is a promising diagnostic imaging tool for the diagnosis of dementia, as PET can add complementary information to the routine imaging examination with MRI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of MRI-bas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31446507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0553-2 |
_version_ | 1783446013090988032 |
---|---|
author | Øen, Silje Kjærnes Keil, Thomas Morten Berntsen, Erik Magnus Aanerud, Joel Fredrik Schwarzlmüller, Thomas Ladefoged, Claes Nøhr Karlberg, Anna Maria Eikenes, Live |
author_facet | Øen, Silje Kjærnes Keil, Thomas Morten Berntsen, Erik Magnus Aanerud, Joel Fredrik Schwarzlmüller, Thomas Ladefoged, Claes Nøhr Karlberg, Anna Maria Eikenes, Live |
author_sort | Øen, Silje Kjærnes |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is a promising diagnostic imaging tool for the diagnosis of dementia, as PET can add complementary information to the routine imaging examination with MRI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of MRI-based attenuation correction (MRAC) on diagnostic assessment of dementia with [(18)F]FDG PET. Quantitative differences in both [(18)F]FDG uptake and z-scores were calculated for three clinically available (DixonNoBone, DixonBone, UTE) and two research MRAC methods (UCL, DeepUTE) compared to CT-based AC (CTAC). Furthermore, diagnoses based on visual evaluations were made by three nuclear medicine physicians and one neuroradiologist (PET(CT), PET(DeepUTE), PET(DixonBone), PET(UTE), PET(CT) + MRI, PET(DixonBone) + MRI). In addition, pons and cerebellum were compared as reference regions for normalization. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference in z-scores were smallest between MRAC and CTAC with cerebellum as reference region: 0.15 ± 0.11 σ (DeepUTE), 0.15 ± 0.12 σ (UCL), 0.23 ± 0.20 σ (DixonBone), 0.32 ± 0.28 σ (DixonNoBone), and 0.54 ± 0.40 σ (UTE). In the visual evaluation, the diagnoses agreed with PET(CT) in 74% (PET(DeepUTE)), 67% (PET(DixonBone)), and 70% (PET(UTE)) of the patients, while PET(CT) + MRI agreed with PET(DixonBone) + MRI in 89% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The MRAC research methods performed close to that of CTAC in the quantitative evaluation of [(18)F]FDG uptake and z-scores. Among the clinically implemented MRAC methods, Dixon(Bone) should be preferred for diagnostic assessment of dementia with [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI. However, as artifacts occur in Dixon(Bone) attenuation maps, they must be visually inspected to assure proper quantification. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-019-0553-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6708519 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67085192019-09-06 Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia Øen, Silje Kjærnes Keil, Thomas Morten Berntsen, Erik Magnus Aanerud, Joel Fredrik Schwarzlmüller, Thomas Ladefoged, Claes Nøhr Karlberg, Anna Maria Eikenes, Live EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is a promising diagnostic imaging tool for the diagnosis of dementia, as PET can add complementary information to the routine imaging examination with MRI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of MRI-based attenuation correction (MRAC) on diagnostic assessment of dementia with [(18)F]FDG PET. Quantitative differences in both [(18)F]FDG uptake and z-scores were calculated for three clinically available (DixonNoBone, DixonBone, UTE) and two research MRAC methods (UCL, DeepUTE) compared to CT-based AC (CTAC). Furthermore, diagnoses based on visual evaluations were made by three nuclear medicine physicians and one neuroradiologist (PET(CT), PET(DeepUTE), PET(DixonBone), PET(UTE), PET(CT) + MRI, PET(DixonBone) + MRI). In addition, pons and cerebellum were compared as reference regions for normalization. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference in z-scores were smallest between MRAC and CTAC with cerebellum as reference region: 0.15 ± 0.11 σ (DeepUTE), 0.15 ± 0.12 σ (UCL), 0.23 ± 0.20 σ (DixonBone), 0.32 ± 0.28 σ (DixonNoBone), and 0.54 ± 0.40 σ (UTE). In the visual evaluation, the diagnoses agreed with PET(CT) in 74% (PET(DeepUTE)), 67% (PET(DixonBone)), and 70% (PET(UTE)) of the patients, while PET(CT) + MRI agreed with PET(DixonBone) + MRI in 89% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The MRAC research methods performed close to that of CTAC in the quantitative evaluation of [(18)F]FDG uptake and z-scores. Among the clinically implemented MRAC methods, Dixon(Bone) should be preferred for diagnostic assessment of dementia with [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI. However, as artifacts occur in Dixon(Bone) attenuation maps, they must be visually inspected to assure proper quantification. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-019-0553-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6708519/ /pubmed/31446507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0553-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Øen, Silje Kjærnes Keil, Thomas Morten Berntsen, Erik Magnus Aanerud, Joel Fredrik Schwarzlmüller, Thomas Ladefoged, Claes Nøhr Karlberg, Anna Maria Eikenes, Live Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia |
title | Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia |
title_full | Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia |
title_fullStr | Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia |
title_short | Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia |
title_sort | quantitative and clinical impact of mri-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)f]fdg evaluation of dementia |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31446507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0553-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT øensiljekjærnes quantitativeandclinicalimpactofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsin18ffdgevaluationofdementia AT keilthomasmorten quantitativeandclinicalimpactofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsin18ffdgevaluationofdementia AT berntsenerikmagnus quantitativeandclinicalimpactofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsin18ffdgevaluationofdementia AT aanerudjoelfredrik quantitativeandclinicalimpactofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsin18ffdgevaluationofdementia AT schwarzlmullerthomas quantitativeandclinicalimpactofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsin18ffdgevaluationofdementia AT ladefogedclaesnøhr quantitativeandclinicalimpactofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsin18ffdgevaluationofdementia AT karlbergannamaria quantitativeandclinicalimpactofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsin18ffdgevaluationofdementia AT eikeneslive quantitativeandclinicalimpactofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsin18ffdgevaluationofdementia |