Cargando…

Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is a promising diagnostic imaging tool for the diagnosis of dementia, as PET can add complementary information to the routine imaging examination with MRI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of MRI-bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Øen, Silje Kjærnes, Keil, Thomas Morten, Berntsen, Erik Magnus, Aanerud, Joel Fredrik, Schwarzlmüller, Thomas, Ladefoged, Claes Nøhr, Karlberg, Anna Maria, Eikenes, Live
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31446507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0553-2
_version_ 1783446013090988032
author Øen, Silje Kjærnes
Keil, Thomas Morten
Berntsen, Erik Magnus
Aanerud, Joel Fredrik
Schwarzlmüller, Thomas
Ladefoged, Claes Nøhr
Karlberg, Anna Maria
Eikenes, Live
author_facet Øen, Silje Kjærnes
Keil, Thomas Morten
Berntsen, Erik Magnus
Aanerud, Joel Fredrik
Schwarzlmüller, Thomas
Ladefoged, Claes Nøhr
Karlberg, Anna Maria
Eikenes, Live
author_sort Øen, Silje Kjærnes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is a promising diagnostic imaging tool for the diagnosis of dementia, as PET can add complementary information to the routine imaging examination with MRI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of MRI-based attenuation correction (MRAC) on diagnostic assessment of dementia with [(18)F]FDG PET. Quantitative differences in both [(18)F]FDG uptake and z-scores were calculated for three clinically available (DixonNoBone, DixonBone, UTE) and two research MRAC methods (UCL, DeepUTE) compared to CT-based AC (CTAC). Furthermore, diagnoses based on visual evaluations were made by three nuclear medicine physicians and one neuroradiologist (PET(CT), PET(DeepUTE), PET(DixonBone), PET(UTE), PET(CT) + MRI, PET(DixonBone) + MRI). In addition, pons and cerebellum were compared as reference regions for normalization. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference in z-scores were smallest between MRAC and CTAC with cerebellum as reference region: 0.15 ± 0.11 σ (DeepUTE), 0.15 ± 0.12 σ (UCL), 0.23 ± 0.20 σ (DixonBone), 0.32 ± 0.28 σ (DixonNoBone), and 0.54 ± 0.40 σ (UTE). In the visual evaluation, the diagnoses agreed with PET(CT) in 74% (PET(DeepUTE)), 67% (PET(DixonBone)), and 70% (PET(UTE)) of the patients, while PET(CT) + MRI agreed with PET(DixonBone) + MRI in 89% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The MRAC research methods performed close to that of CTAC in the quantitative evaluation of [(18)F]FDG uptake and z-scores. Among the clinically implemented MRAC methods, Dixon(Bone) should be preferred for diagnostic assessment of dementia with [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI. However, as artifacts occur in Dixon(Bone) attenuation maps, they must be visually inspected to assure proper quantification. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-019-0553-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6708519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67085192019-09-06 Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia Øen, Silje Kjærnes Keil, Thomas Morten Berntsen, Erik Magnus Aanerud, Joel Fredrik Schwarzlmüller, Thomas Ladefoged, Claes Nøhr Karlberg, Anna Maria Eikenes, Live EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is a promising diagnostic imaging tool for the diagnosis of dementia, as PET can add complementary information to the routine imaging examination with MRI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of MRI-based attenuation correction (MRAC) on diagnostic assessment of dementia with [(18)F]FDG PET. Quantitative differences in both [(18)F]FDG uptake and z-scores were calculated for three clinically available (DixonNoBone, DixonBone, UTE) and two research MRAC methods (UCL, DeepUTE) compared to CT-based AC (CTAC). Furthermore, diagnoses based on visual evaluations were made by three nuclear medicine physicians and one neuroradiologist (PET(CT), PET(DeepUTE), PET(DixonBone), PET(UTE), PET(CT) + MRI, PET(DixonBone) + MRI). In addition, pons and cerebellum were compared as reference regions for normalization. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference in z-scores were smallest between MRAC and CTAC with cerebellum as reference region: 0.15 ± 0.11 σ (DeepUTE), 0.15 ± 0.12 σ (UCL), 0.23 ± 0.20 σ (DixonBone), 0.32 ± 0.28 σ (DixonNoBone), and 0.54 ± 0.40 σ (UTE). In the visual evaluation, the diagnoses agreed with PET(CT) in 74% (PET(DeepUTE)), 67% (PET(DixonBone)), and 70% (PET(UTE)) of the patients, while PET(CT) + MRI agreed with PET(DixonBone) + MRI in 89% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The MRAC research methods performed close to that of CTAC in the quantitative evaluation of [(18)F]FDG uptake and z-scores. Among the clinically implemented MRAC methods, Dixon(Bone) should be preferred for diagnostic assessment of dementia with [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI. However, as artifacts occur in Dixon(Bone) attenuation maps, they must be visually inspected to assure proper quantification. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-019-0553-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6708519/ /pubmed/31446507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0553-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Øen, Silje Kjærnes
Keil, Thomas Morten
Berntsen, Erik Magnus
Aanerud, Joel Fredrik
Schwarzlmüller, Thomas
Ladefoged, Claes Nøhr
Karlberg, Anna Maria
Eikenes, Live
Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia
title Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia
title_full Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia
title_fullStr Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia
title_short Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)F]FDG evaluation of dementia
title_sort quantitative and clinical impact of mri-based attenuation correction methods in [(18)f]fdg evaluation of dementia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31446507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0553-2
work_keys_str_mv AT øensiljekjærnes quantitativeandclinicalimpactofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsin18ffdgevaluationofdementia
AT keilthomasmorten quantitativeandclinicalimpactofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsin18ffdgevaluationofdementia
AT berntsenerikmagnus quantitativeandclinicalimpactofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsin18ffdgevaluationofdementia
AT aanerudjoelfredrik quantitativeandclinicalimpactofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsin18ffdgevaluationofdementia
AT schwarzlmullerthomas quantitativeandclinicalimpactofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsin18ffdgevaluationofdementia
AT ladefogedclaesnøhr quantitativeandclinicalimpactofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsin18ffdgevaluationofdementia
AT karlbergannamaria quantitativeandclinicalimpactofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsin18ffdgevaluationofdementia
AT eikeneslive quantitativeandclinicalimpactofmribasedattenuationcorrectionmethodsin18ffdgevaluationofdementia