Cargando…

Practice and Attitudes of Donor Coordinator Roles Regarding Physical Examination of Potential Organ and Tissue Donors in Australia

BACKGROUND. Physical examination of potential organ and tissue donors is standard practice to mitigate risks and optimize outcomes for transplant recipients, but the content and process of the examination has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to determine current practice of performin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holloway, Justine A.C., Ranse, Kristen, Bail, Kasia, Jamieson, Maggie, Van Haren, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31576367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000906
_version_ 1783446033113546752
author Holloway, Justine A.C.
Ranse, Kristen
Bail, Kasia
Jamieson, Maggie
Van Haren, Frank
author_facet Holloway, Justine A.C.
Ranse, Kristen
Bail, Kasia
Jamieson, Maggie
Van Haren, Frank
author_sort Holloway, Justine A.C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND. Physical examination of potential organ and tissue donors is standard practice to mitigate risks and optimize outcomes for transplant recipients, but the content and process of the examination has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to determine current practice of performing a physical examination on potential organ and tissue donors in Australia. METHODS. An online cross-sectional survey was circulated to all Australian Donor Coordinators (n = 125). RESULTS. There were 75 responses (60% response rate) to the online survey. Respondents perform a mean 10.5 physical examinations per year. Inconsistencies were observed in the approach to the physical examination, inclusive of assessment techniques used to perform the examination such as palpation. Specific staff training and education to perform the examination was reportedly provided to 77% of respondents. There was less variation reported in examination findings classified as higher risk and escalation procedures with the 3 most common findings of injection sites / track marks (86%), suspicious moles (77%), and unexplained scarring (51%), and with 97% seeking a second opinion. Current and previously removed melanomas were the main examination findings that stopped a donation from proceeding, as reported to have occurred by 18 respondents. CONCLUSIONS. This study has identified variations in current physical examination practice and provided the evidence to pursue practice improvement. The inconsistencies can be partly attributed to discrepancies in training and education of staff and no standardized national guidelines to clearly outline expected practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6708629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67086292019-10-01 Practice and Attitudes of Donor Coordinator Roles Regarding Physical Examination of Potential Organ and Tissue Donors in Australia Holloway, Justine A.C. Ranse, Kristen Bail, Kasia Jamieson, Maggie Van Haren, Frank Transplant Direct Organ Donation and Procurement BACKGROUND. Physical examination of potential organ and tissue donors is standard practice to mitigate risks and optimize outcomes for transplant recipients, but the content and process of the examination has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to determine current practice of performing a physical examination on potential organ and tissue donors in Australia. METHODS. An online cross-sectional survey was circulated to all Australian Donor Coordinators (n = 125). RESULTS. There were 75 responses (60% response rate) to the online survey. Respondents perform a mean 10.5 physical examinations per year. Inconsistencies were observed in the approach to the physical examination, inclusive of assessment techniques used to perform the examination such as palpation. Specific staff training and education to perform the examination was reportedly provided to 77% of respondents. There was less variation reported in examination findings classified as higher risk and escalation procedures with the 3 most common findings of injection sites / track marks (86%), suspicious moles (77%), and unexplained scarring (51%), and with 97% seeking a second opinion. Current and previously removed melanomas were the main examination findings that stopped a donation from proceeding, as reported to have occurred by 18 respondents. CONCLUSIONS. This study has identified variations in current physical examination practice and provided the evidence to pursue practice improvement. The inconsistencies can be partly attributed to discrepancies in training and education of staff and no standardized national guidelines to clearly outline expected practice. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6708629/ /pubmed/31576367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000906 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Organ Donation and Procurement
Holloway, Justine A.C.
Ranse, Kristen
Bail, Kasia
Jamieson, Maggie
Van Haren, Frank
Practice and Attitudes of Donor Coordinator Roles Regarding Physical Examination of Potential Organ and Tissue Donors in Australia
title Practice and Attitudes of Donor Coordinator Roles Regarding Physical Examination of Potential Organ and Tissue Donors in Australia
title_full Practice and Attitudes of Donor Coordinator Roles Regarding Physical Examination of Potential Organ and Tissue Donors in Australia
title_fullStr Practice and Attitudes of Donor Coordinator Roles Regarding Physical Examination of Potential Organ and Tissue Donors in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Practice and Attitudes of Donor Coordinator Roles Regarding Physical Examination of Potential Organ and Tissue Donors in Australia
title_short Practice and Attitudes of Donor Coordinator Roles Regarding Physical Examination of Potential Organ and Tissue Donors in Australia
title_sort practice and attitudes of donor coordinator roles regarding physical examination of potential organ and tissue donors in australia
topic Organ Donation and Procurement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31576367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000906
work_keys_str_mv AT hollowayjustineac practiceandattitudesofdonorcoordinatorrolesregardingphysicalexaminationofpotentialorganandtissuedonorsinaustralia
AT ransekristen practiceandattitudesofdonorcoordinatorrolesregardingphysicalexaminationofpotentialorganandtissuedonorsinaustralia
AT bailkasia practiceandattitudesofdonorcoordinatorrolesregardingphysicalexaminationofpotentialorganandtissuedonorsinaustralia
AT jamiesonmaggie practiceandattitudesofdonorcoordinatorrolesregardingphysicalexaminationofpotentialorganandtissuedonorsinaustralia
AT vanharenfrank practiceandattitudesofdonorcoordinatorrolesregardingphysicalexaminationofpotentialorganandtissuedonorsinaustralia