Cargando…

Early Experience with a Novel Strategy for Assessment of Sepsis Risk: The Shock Huddle

INTRODUCTION: Severe sepsis/septic shock (SS), a leading cause of death in children, is a complex clinical syndrome that can be challenging to diagnose. To assist with the early and accurate diagnosis of this illness, we instituted an electronic scoring tool and developed a novel strategy for the as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stinson, Hannah R., Viteri, Shirley, Koetter, Paige, Stevens, Erica, Remillard, Kristin, Parlow, Rebecca, Setlik, Jennifer, Frizzola, Meg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31572898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000197
_version_ 1783446036964966400
author Stinson, Hannah R.
Viteri, Shirley
Koetter, Paige
Stevens, Erica
Remillard, Kristin
Parlow, Rebecca
Setlik, Jennifer
Frizzola, Meg
author_facet Stinson, Hannah R.
Viteri, Shirley
Koetter, Paige
Stevens, Erica
Remillard, Kristin
Parlow, Rebecca
Setlik, Jennifer
Frizzola, Meg
author_sort Stinson, Hannah R.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Severe sepsis/septic shock (SS), a leading cause of death in children, is a complex clinical syndrome that can be challenging to diagnose. To assist with the early and accurate diagnosis of this illness, we instituted an electronic scoring tool and developed a novel strategy for the assessment of currently hospitalized children at risk for SS. METHODS: The Shock Tool was created to alert providers to children at risk for SS. Above a threshold score of 45, patients were evaluated by a team from the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), led by the Shock Nurse (RN), a specially trained PICU nurse, to assess their need for further therapies. Data related to this evaluation, termed a Shock Huddle, were collected and reviewed with the intensivist fellow on service. RESULTS: Over 1 year, 9,241 hospitalized patients were screened using the Shock Score. There were 206 Shock Huddles on 109 unique patients. Nearly 40% of Shock Huddles included a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention at the time of patient assessment, with the most frequent intervention being a fluid bolus. Shock Huddles resulted in a patient transfer to the PICU 10% of the time. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an electronic medical record-based sepsis recognition tool paired with a novel strategy for rapid assessment of at-risk patients by a Shock RN is feasible and offers an alternative strategy to a traditional medical emergency team for the delivery of sepsis-related care. Further study is needed to describe the impact of this process on patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6708645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67086452019-09-30 Early Experience with a Novel Strategy for Assessment of Sepsis Risk: The Shock Huddle Stinson, Hannah R. Viteri, Shirley Koetter, Paige Stevens, Erica Remillard, Kristin Parlow, Rebecca Setlik, Jennifer Frizzola, Meg Pediatr Qual Saf Individual QI Projects from Single Institutions INTRODUCTION: Severe sepsis/septic shock (SS), a leading cause of death in children, is a complex clinical syndrome that can be challenging to diagnose. To assist with the early and accurate diagnosis of this illness, we instituted an electronic scoring tool and developed a novel strategy for the assessment of currently hospitalized children at risk for SS. METHODS: The Shock Tool was created to alert providers to children at risk for SS. Above a threshold score of 45, patients were evaluated by a team from the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), led by the Shock Nurse (RN), a specially trained PICU nurse, to assess their need for further therapies. Data related to this evaluation, termed a Shock Huddle, were collected and reviewed with the intensivist fellow on service. RESULTS: Over 1 year, 9,241 hospitalized patients were screened using the Shock Score. There were 206 Shock Huddles on 109 unique patients. Nearly 40% of Shock Huddles included a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention at the time of patient assessment, with the most frequent intervention being a fluid bolus. Shock Huddles resulted in a patient transfer to the PICU 10% of the time. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an electronic medical record-based sepsis recognition tool paired with a novel strategy for rapid assessment of at-risk patients by a Shock RN is feasible and offers an alternative strategy to a traditional medical emergency team for the delivery of sepsis-related care. Further study is needed to describe the impact of this process on patient outcomes. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6708645/ /pubmed/31572898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000197 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Individual QI Projects from Single Institutions
Stinson, Hannah R.
Viteri, Shirley
Koetter, Paige
Stevens, Erica
Remillard, Kristin
Parlow, Rebecca
Setlik, Jennifer
Frizzola, Meg
Early Experience with a Novel Strategy for Assessment of Sepsis Risk: The Shock Huddle
title Early Experience with a Novel Strategy for Assessment of Sepsis Risk: The Shock Huddle
title_full Early Experience with a Novel Strategy for Assessment of Sepsis Risk: The Shock Huddle
title_fullStr Early Experience with a Novel Strategy for Assessment of Sepsis Risk: The Shock Huddle
title_full_unstemmed Early Experience with a Novel Strategy for Assessment of Sepsis Risk: The Shock Huddle
title_short Early Experience with a Novel Strategy for Assessment of Sepsis Risk: The Shock Huddle
title_sort early experience with a novel strategy for assessment of sepsis risk: the shock huddle
topic Individual QI Projects from Single Institutions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31572898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000197
work_keys_str_mv AT stinsonhannahr earlyexperiencewithanovelstrategyforassessmentofsepsisrisktheshockhuddle
AT viterishirley earlyexperiencewithanovelstrategyforassessmentofsepsisrisktheshockhuddle
AT koetterpaige earlyexperiencewithanovelstrategyforassessmentofsepsisrisktheshockhuddle
AT stevenserica earlyexperiencewithanovelstrategyforassessmentofsepsisrisktheshockhuddle
AT remillardkristin earlyexperiencewithanovelstrategyforassessmentofsepsisrisktheshockhuddle
AT parlowrebecca earlyexperiencewithanovelstrategyforassessmentofsepsisrisktheshockhuddle
AT setlikjennifer earlyexperiencewithanovelstrategyforassessmentofsepsisrisktheshockhuddle
AT frizzolameg earlyexperiencewithanovelstrategyforassessmentofsepsisrisktheshockhuddle