Cargando…

Disclosure of Adverse Events: A Guide for Clinicians

INTRODUCTION: Children’s Hospitals’ Solutions for Patient Safety (SPS) acknowledged a recommendation from the American Academy of Pediatrics to develop education programs on the communication of adverse events with patients and families. SPS set out to create a guide that would outline a standardize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peterson, Kimberly A., Rutherford, Mary, Drvol, Denise, Barkman, Darlene, Phipps, Amber R., Hales, Roberta, Dawson, Aaron, Stevens, Laurie, Teman, Susan, Teets, Jeanette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31572887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000185
_version_ 1783446039131324416
author Peterson, Kimberly A.
Rutherford, Mary
Drvol, Denise
Barkman, Darlene
Phipps, Amber R.
Hales, Roberta
Dawson, Aaron
Stevens, Laurie
Teman, Susan
Teets, Jeanette
author_facet Peterson, Kimberly A.
Rutherford, Mary
Drvol, Denise
Barkman, Darlene
Phipps, Amber R.
Hales, Roberta
Dawson, Aaron
Stevens, Laurie
Teman, Susan
Teets, Jeanette
author_sort Peterson, Kimberly A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Children’s Hospitals’ Solutions for Patient Safety (SPS) acknowledged a recommendation from the American Academy of Pediatrics to develop education programs on the communication of adverse events with patients and families. SPS set out to create a guide that would outline a standardized disclosure process and provide a training curriculum and tools so that providers would feel better prepared to have effective disclosure conversations. METHODS: SPS disclosure work began with the development of a project team made up of 9 network hospitals. The team utilized key driver diagrams and process maps to show the relationship between the project aims, key drivers, and specific interventions. The team developed a training curriculum, guide, and tools for each area of improvement. To ensure these were effective, they were tested using case studies and plan-do-study-act cycles. RESULTS: One of the cohort hospitals piloted the curriculum and tools, training 48 physicians, nurses, executives, and other allied health professionals. Pretest to posttest scores improved from an average of 82.7% to 90.2%. Survey feedback was favorable with 100% of respondents noting that they strongly agree or agree that attending this educational activity increased or improved their competency, performance, and patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Initial testing suggests that the developed curriculum is empowering for frontline clinicians. Materials are available in an electronic format on the SPS external website. As member hospitals implement these materials, they will be evaluating learner satisfaction and provider usage. SPS will seek out feedback from these hospitals to further develop the materials and support clinicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6708654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67086542019-09-30 Disclosure of Adverse Events: A Guide for Clinicians Peterson, Kimberly A. Rutherford, Mary Drvol, Denise Barkman, Darlene Phipps, Amber R. Hales, Roberta Dawson, Aaron Stevens, Laurie Teman, Susan Teets, Jeanette Pediatr Qual Saf Multi-Institutional Collaborative and QI Network Research INTRODUCTION: Children’s Hospitals’ Solutions for Patient Safety (SPS) acknowledged a recommendation from the American Academy of Pediatrics to develop education programs on the communication of adverse events with patients and families. SPS set out to create a guide that would outline a standardized disclosure process and provide a training curriculum and tools so that providers would feel better prepared to have effective disclosure conversations. METHODS: SPS disclosure work began with the development of a project team made up of 9 network hospitals. The team utilized key driver diagrams and process maps to show the relationship between the project aims, key drivers, and specific interventions. The team developed a training curriculum, guide, and tools for each area of improvement. To ensure these were effective, they were tested using case studies and plan-do-study-act cycles. RESULTS: One of the cohort hospitals piloted the curriculum and tools, training 48 physicians, nurses, executives, and other allied health professionals. Pretest to posttest scores improved from an average of 82.7% to 90.2%. Survey feedback was favorable with 100% of respondents noting that they strongly agree or agree that attending this educational activity increased or improved their competency, performance, and patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Initial testing suggests that the developed curriculum is empowering for frontline clinicians. Materials are available in an electronic format on the SPS external website. As member hospitals implement these materials, they will be evaluating learner satisfaction and provider usage. SPS will seek out feedback from these hospitals to further develop the materials and support clinicians. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6708654/ /pubmed/31572887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000185 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Multi-Institutional Collaborative and QI Network Research
Peterson, Kimberly A.
Rutherford, Mary
Drvol, Denise
Barkman, Darlene
Phipps, Amber R.
Hales, Roberta
Dawson, Aaron
Stevens, Laurie
Teman, Susan
Teets, Jeanette
Disclosure of Adverse Events: A Guide for Clinicians
title Disclosure of Adverse Events: A Guide for Clinicians
title_full Disclosure of Adverse Events: A Guide for Clinicians
title_fullStr Disclosure of Adverse Events: A Guide for Clinicians
title_full_unstemmed Disclosure of Adverse Events: A Guide for Clinicians
title_short Disclosure of Adverse Events: A Guide for Clinicians
title_sort disclosure of adverse events: a guide for clinicians
topic Multi-Institutional Collaborative and QI Network Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31572887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000185
work_keys_str_mv AT petersonkimberlya disclosureofadverseeventsaguideforclinicians
AT rutherfordmary disclosureofadverseeventsaguideforclinicians
AT drvoldenise disclosureofadverseeventsaguideforclinicians
AT barkmandarlene disclosureofadverseeventsaguideforclinicians
AT phippsamberr disclosureofadverseeventsaguideforclinicians
AT halesroberta disclosureofadverseeventsaguideforclinicians
AT dawsonaaron disclosureofadverseeventsaguideforclinicians
AT stevenslaurie disclosureofadverseeventsaguideforclinicians
AT temansusan disclosureofadverseeventsaguideforclinicians
AT teetsjeanette disclosureofadverseeventsaguideforclinicians