Cargando…

Risk factors for drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) is very common among children and adults and studies had found some related risk factors for DRE, while the results were not consistent. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for drug-resistant epilepsy. METHODS: Three electronic databases (Medl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xue-Ping, Wang, Hai-Jiao, Wang, Li-Na, Zhu, Xu, Da, Ling, Liu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31348240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016402
_version_ 1783446062679195648
author Xue-Ping, Wang
Hai-Jiao, Wang
Li-Na, Zhu
Xu, Da
Ling, Liu
author_facet Xue-Ping, Wang
Hai-Jiao, Wang
Li-Na, Zhu
Xu, Da
Ling, Liu
author_sort Xue-Ping, Wang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) is very common among children and adults and studies had found some related risk factors for DRE, while the results were not consistent. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for drug-resistant epilepsy. METHODS: Three electronic databases (Medline, Embase and Cochrane library) were searched to identify studies with a cohort design reporting on epidemiologic evidence regarding risk factors for DRE. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of DRE in newly diagnosed epilepsy patients was 25% (95% CI 17–32%). Abnormal electroencephalography (EEG) (both slow wave and epileptiform discharges) (RR 2.80; 95% CI 1.95–4.0), status epilepticus (SE) (RR 11.60; 95% CI 7.39–18.22), symptomatic etiology (RR 3.36; 95% CI 2.53–4.46), multiple seizure types (RR 3.66; 95% CI 2.37–5.64) and febrile seizures (RR 3.43; 95% CI 1.95–6.02) were identified as strong risk factors for DRE. In addition, firm conclusions cannot be drawn for poor short-term outcomes of therapy, neurodevelopment delay and high initial seizure frequency for the heterogeneity of study results. The predictive effect of focus onset seizure was not stable after removing one study and switching the effect model. Age of onset was not risk factors for DRE. CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis identified potential risk factors for DRE. The results may contribute to better prevention strategies and treatments for DRE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6708813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67088132019-10-01 Risk factors for drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis Xue-Ping, Wang Hai-Jiao, Wang Li-Na, Zhu Xu, Da Ling, Liu Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) is very common among children and adults and studies had found some related risk factors for DRE, while the results were not consistent. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for drug-resistant epilepsy. METHODS: Three electronic databases (Medline, Embase and Cochrane library) were searched to identify studies with a cohort design reporting on epidemiologic evidence regarding risk factors for DRE. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of DRE in newly diagnosed epilepsy patients was 25% (95% CI 17–32%). Abnormal electroencephalography (EEG) (both slow wave and epileptiform discharges) (RR 2.80; 95% CI 1.95–4.0), status epilepticus (SE) (RR 11.60; 95% CI 7.39–18.22), symptomatic etiology (RR 3.36; 95% CI 2.53–4.46), multiple seizure types (RR 3.66; 95% CI 2.37–5.64) and febrile seizures (RR 3.43; 95% CI 1.95–6.02) were identified as strong risk factors for DRE. In addition, firm conclusions cannot be drawn for poor short-term outcomes of therapy, neurodevelopment delay and high initial seizure frequency for the heterogeneity of study results. The predictive effect of focus onset seizure was not stable after removing one study and switching the effect model. Age of onset was not risk factors for DRE. CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis identified potential risk factors for DRE. The results may contribute to better prevention strategies and treatments for DRE. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6708813/ /pubmed/31348240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016402 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Xue-Ping, Wang
Hai-Jiao, Wang
Li-Na, Zhu
Xu, Da
Ling, Liu
Risk factors for drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Risk factors for drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Risk factors for drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Risk factors for drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Risk factors for drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort risk factors for drug-resistant epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31348240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016402
work_keys_str_mv AT xuepingwang riskfactorsfordrugresistantepilepsyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haijiaowang riskfactorsfordrugresistantepilepsyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linazhu riskfactorsfordrugresistantepilepsyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuda riskfactorsfordrugresistantepilepsyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lingliu riskfactorsfordrugresistantepilepsyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis