Cargando…

Preclinical evaluation of a new cryopreservation container for a limited number of human spermatozoa

The aim of this study was to develop a new container for cryopreservation of a limited number of spermatozoa. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of this new container, we performed preclinical evaluations using human sperm or mouse oocytes and sperm. First, using human sperm that was frozen and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: NAKATA, Kumiko, YOSHIDA, Kaoru, YAMASHITA, Naoki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society for Reproduction and Development 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2017-086
_version_ 1783446071004889088
author NAKATA, Kumiko
YOSHIDA, Kaoru
YAMASHITA, Naoki
author_facet NAKATA, Kumiko
YOSHIDA, Kaoru
YAMASHITA, Naoki
author_sort NAKATA, Kumiko
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to develop a new container for cryopreservation of a limited number of spermatozoa. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of this new container, we performed preclinical evaluations using human sperm or mouse oocytes and sperm. First, using human sperm that was frozen and then thawed, we demonstrated that the sperm recovery rate using the new container was 96.7% (58/60), which was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than the recovery rate of 21.2% (11/52) when using the Cryotop(®). Sperm motility rates were 19.2% (10/52) using the Cryotop(®) and 35.0% (21/60) using the new container. Second, murine epididymal spermatozoa were divided into three groups: fresh spermatozoa, spermatozoa frozen using a straw, and spermatozoa frozen using the new container. Sperm motility, sperm membrane and DNA integrity, in vitro development of fertilized eggs, and offspring development after embryo transfer were assessed. The motility of freeze-thawed sperm was lower in spermatozoa that were frozen using the new container than in fresh spermatozoa or those that were frozen using a straw. After intracytoplasmic sperm injection, the survival rate was 96.7% (145/150), the 2-cell development rate was 90.3% (131/145), and the blastocyst development rate was 77.2% (112/145), when using the new container. There were no differences in the sperm membrane, DNA integrity, or in the embryo development rates to the blastocyst stage among the different frozen groups. Six offspring were derived from spermatozoa freeze-thawed in the new container, and they developed normally. Thus, the new container allows easy handling of a small number of sperms and minimizes sperm loss during cryopreservation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6708847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Society for Reproduction and Development
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67088472019-08-30 Preclinical evaluation of a new cryopreservation container for a limited number of human spermatozoa NAKATA, Kumiko YOSHIDA, Kaoru YAMASHITA, Naoki J Reprod Dev Original Article The aim of this study was to develop a new container for cryopreservation of a limited number of spermatozoa. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of this new container, we performed preclinical evaluations using human sperm or mouse oocytes and sperm. First, using human sperm that was frozen and then thawed, we demonstrated that the sperm recovery rate using the new container was 96.7% (58/60), which was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than the recovery rate of 21.2% (11/52) when using the Cryotop(®). Sperm motility rates were 19.2% (10/52) using the Cryotop(®) and 35.0% (21/60) using the new container. Second, murine epididymal spermatozoa were divided into three groups: fresh spermatozoa, spermatozoa frozen using a straw, and spermatozoa frozen using the new container. Sperm motility, sperm membrane and DNA integrity, in vitro development of fertilized eggs, and offspring development after embryo transfer were assessed. The motility of freeze-thawed sperm was lower in spermatozoa that were frozen using the new container than in fresh spermatozoa or those that were frozen using a straw. After intracytoplasmic sperm injection, the survival rate was 96.7% (145/150), the 2-cell development rate was 90.3% (131/145), and the blastocyst development rate was 77.2% (112/145), when using the new container. There were no differences in the sperm membrane, DNA integrity, or in the embryo development rates to the blastocyst stage among the different frozen groups. Six offspring were derived from spermatozoa freeze-thawed in the new container, and they developed normally. Thus, the new container allows easy handling of a small number of sperms and minimizes sperm loss during cryopreservation. The Society for Reproduction and Development 2019-04-11 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6708847/ /pubmed/30971616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2017-086 Text en ©2019 Society for Reproduction and Development This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
NAKATA, Kumiko
YOSHIDA, Kaoru
YAMASHITA, Naoki
Preclinical evaluation of a new cryopreservation container for a limited number of human spermatozoa
title Preclinical evaluation of a new cryopreservation container for a limited number of human spermatozoa
title_full Preclinical evaluation of a new cryopreservation container for a limited number of human spermatozoa
title_fullStr Preclinical evaluation of a new cryopreservation container for a limited number of human spermatozoa
title_full_unstemmed Preclinical evaluation of a new cryopreservation container for a limited number of human spermatozoa
title_short Preclinical evaluation of a new cryopreservation container for a limited number of human spermatozoa
title_sort preclinical evaluation of a new cryopreservation container for a limited number of human spermatozoa
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2017-086
work_keys_str_mv AT nakatakumiko preclinicalevaluationofanewcryopreservationcontainerforalimitednumberofhumanspermatozoa
AT yoshidakaoru preclinicalevaluationofanewcryopreservationcontainerforalimitednumberofhumanspermatozoa
AT yamashitanaoki preclinicalevaluationofanewcryopreservationcontainerforalimitednumberofhumanspermatozoa