Cargando…

Restrictive versus liberal strategy for red blood-cell transfusion in hip fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Most clinical guidelines recommend a restrictive red-blood-cell (RBC) transfusion threshold. However, indications for transfusion in patients with a hip fracture have not been definitively evaluated or remain controversial. We compared the pros and cons of restrictive versus liberal tran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Chao, Yin, Jian, Wang, Bin, Xue, Qingmei, Gao, Shan, Xing, Linyu, Wang, Hua, Liu, Wei, Liu, Xinhui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31393409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016795
_version_ 1783446101453438976
author Zhu, Chao
Yin, Jian
Wang, Bin
Xue, Qingmei
Gao, Shan
Xing, Linyu
Wang, Hua
Liu, Wei
Liu, Xinhui
author_facet Zhu, Chao
Yin, Jian
Wang, Bin
Xue, Qingmei
Gao, Shan
Xing, Linyu
Wang, Hua
Liu, Wei
Liu, Xinhui
author_sort Zhu, Chao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most clinical guidelines recommend a restrictive red-blood-cell (RBC) transfusion threshold. However, indications for transfusion in patients with a hip fracture have not been definitively evaluated or remain controversial. We compared the pros and cons of restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective cohort studies (RCSs) to investigate the effects of a restrictive strategy versus its liberal counterpart in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. The main clinical outcomes included delirium, mortality, infections, cardiogenic complications, thromboembolic events, cerebrovascular accidents, and length of hospital stay. The meta-analysis program of the Cochrane Collaboration (RevMan version 5.3.0) was used for data analysis. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by both Cochran chi-squared test (Q test) and I(2) test. Both Begg and Egger tests were used to assess potential publication bias. RESULTS: We identified 7 eligible RCTs and 2 eligible RCSs, involving 3,575 patients in total. In patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, we found no differences in frequency of delirium, mortality, the incidence rates of all infections, pneumonia, wound infection, all cardiovascular events, congestive heart failure, thromboembolic events or length of hospital stay between restrictive and liberal thresholds for RBC transfusion (P >.05). However, we found that the use of restrictive transfusion thresholds is associated with higher rates of acute coronary syndrome (P <.05) while liberal transfusion thresholds increase the risk of cerebrovascular accidents (P <.05). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, clinicians should evaluate the patient's condition in detail and adopt different transfusion strategies according to the patient's specific situation rather than merely using a certain transfusion strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6708976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67089762019-10-01 Restrictive versus liberal strategy for red blood-cell transfusion in hip fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Zhu, Chao Yin, Jian Wang, Bin Xue, Qingmei Gao, Shan Xing, Linyu Wang, Hua Liu, Wei Liu, Xinhui Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Most clinical guidelines recommend a restrictive red-blood-cell (RBC) transfusion threshold. However, indications for transfusion in patients with a hip fracture have not been definitively evaluated or remain controversial. We compared the pros and cons of restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective cohort studies (RCSs) to investigate the effects of a restrictive strategy versus its liberal counterpart in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. The main clinical outcomes included delirium, mortality, infections, cardiogenic complications, thromboembolic events, cerebrovascular accidents, and length of hospital stay. The meta-analysis program of the Cochrane Collaboration (RevMan version 5.3.0) was used for data analysis. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by both Cochran chi-squared test (Q test) and I(2) test. Both Begg and Egger tests were used to assess potential publication bias. RESULTS: We identified 7 eligible RCTs and 2 eligible RCSs, involving 3,575 patients in total. In patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, we found no differences in frequency of delirium, mortality, the incidence rates of all infections, pneumonia, wound infection, all cardiovascular events, congestive heart failure, thromboembolic events or length of hospital stay between restrictive and liberal thresholds for RBC transfusion (P >.05). However, we found that the use of restrictive transfusion thresholds is associated with higher rates of acute coronary syndrome (P <.05) while liberal transfusion thresholds increase the risk of cerebrovascular accidents (P <.05). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, clinicians should evaluate the patient's condition in detail and adopt different transfusion strategies according to the patient's specific situation rather than merely using a certain transfusion strategy. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6708976/ /pubmed/31393409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016795 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhu, Chao
Yin, Jian
Wang, Bin
Xue, Qingmei
Gao, Shan
Xing, Linyu
Wang, Hua
Liu, Wei
Liu, Xinhui
Restrictive versus liberal strategy for red blood-cell transfusion in hip fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Restrictive versus liberal strategy for red blood-cell transfusion in hip fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Restrictive versus liberal strategy for red blood-cell transfusion in hip fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Restrictive versus liberal strategy for red blood-cell transfusion in hip fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Restrictive versus liberal strategy for red blood-cell transfusion in hip fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Restrictive versus liberal strategy for red blood-cell transfusion in hip fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort restrictive versus liberal strategy for red blood-cell transfusion in hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31393409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016795
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuchao restrictiveversusliberalstrategyforredbloodcelltransfusioninhipfracturepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yinjian restrictiveversusliberalstrategyforredbloodcelltransfusioninhipfracturepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangbin restrictiveversusliberalstrategyforredbloodcelltransfusioninhipfracturepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xueqingmei restrictiveversusliberalstrategyforredbloodcelltransfusioninhipfracturepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaoshan restrictiveversusliberalstrategyforredbloodcelltransfusioninhipfracturepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xinglinyu restrictiveversusliberalstrategyforredbloodcelltransfusioninhipfracturepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanghua restrictiveversusliberalstrategyforredbloodcelltransfusioninhipfracturepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuwei restrictiveversusliberalstrategyforredbloodcelltransfusioninhipfracturepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuxinhui restrictiveversusliberalstrategyforredbloodcelltransfusioninhipfracturepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis