Cargando…
Robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Three case reports
INTRODUCTION: Nowadays laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered as criterion standard for surgical treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis. During the last few years, there has been growing interest about the robotic approach. Several authors have reported the superiority of robotic cholecystec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31348226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016010 |
_version_ | 1783446105697026048 |
---|---|
author | Milone, M. Vertaldi, S. Bracale, U. D’Ambra, M. Cassese, G. Manigrasso, M. De Palma, G.D. |
author_facet | Milone, M. Vertaldi, S. Bracale, U. D’Ambra, M. Cassese, G. Manigrasso, M. De Palma, G.D. |
author_sort | Milone, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Nowadays laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered as criterion standard for surgical treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis. During the last few years, there has been growing interest about the robotic approach. Several authors have reported the superiority of robotic cholecystectomy, associated with a lower percentage of conversion especially in patients with intraoperative diagnosis of acute or gangrenous cholecystitis. We report 3 case reports of moderate acute cholecystitis successfully treated by robotic cholecystectomy. PATIENT CONCERNS: Three patients presented moderate acute calculous cholecystitis with leukocytosis, fever, nausea, vomiting, and pain. DIAGNOSIS: Three patients of our study population had clinical and laboratory suspicion of moderate acute calculous cholecystitis verified by abdominal ultrasound examination, which found out cholelitiasis in all 3 cases. Final diagnosis was confirmed by intraoperative findings and histopathological examination, with two empyematous cholecystitis and one perforated cholecystitis. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent robotic cholecystectomy with the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System. The entire procedure required a mean operation time of 128 minutes and the average blood loss was 60 mL, without any intraoperative complications. OUTCOMES: In all 3 cases postoperative period was uneventfull. All the patients were discharged within 24 hours and no readmissions were reported during a 30 days’ follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic cholecystectomy for ACC is feasible and safe. Several studies have demonstrated that robotic approach reduces the risk of conversion to open surgery in case of acute or gangrenous cholecystitis. Our results are in line with current literature. In fact, we have successfully treated 2 patients with empyematous acute cholecystitis and 1 with gangrenous cholecystitis with a totally robotic approach, without any complications or need of conversion to open surgery. In conclusion, our results confirm that it is the time to include robotic surgery in the emergency setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6708993 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67089932019-10-01 Robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Three case reports Milone, M. Vertaldi, S. Bracale, U. D’Ambra, M. Cassese, G. Manigrasso, M. De Palma, G.D. Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article INTRODUCTION: Nowadays laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered as criterion standard for surgical treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis. During the last few years, there has been growing interest about the robotic approach. Several authors have reported the superiority of robotic cholecystectomy, associated with a lower percentage of conversion especially in patients with intraoperative diagnosis of acute or gangrenous cholecystitis. We report 3 case reports of moderate acute cholecystitis successfully treated by robotic cholecystectomy. PATIENT CONCERNS: Three patients presented moderate acute calculous cholecystitis with leukocytosis, fever, nausea, vomiting, and pain. DIAGNOSIS: Three patients of our study population had clinical and laboratory suspicion of moderate acute calculous cholecystitis verified by abdominal ultrasound examination, which found out cholelitiasis in all 3 cases. Final diagnosis was confirmed by intraoperative findings and histopathological examination, with two empyematous cholecystitis and one perforated cholecystitis. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent robotic cholecystectomy with the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System. The entire procedure required a mean operation time of 128 minutes and the average blood loss was 60 mL, without any intraoperative complications. OUTCOMES: In all 3 cases postoperative period was uneventfull. All the patients were discharged within 24 hours and no readmissions were reported during a 30 days’ follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic cholecystectomy for ACC is feasible and safe. Several studies have demonstrated that robotic approach reduces the risk of conversion to open surgery in case of acute or gangrenous cholecystitis. Our results are in line with current literature. In fact, we have successfully treated 2 patients with empyematous acute cholecystitis and 1 with gangrenous cholecystitis with a totally robotic approach, without any complications or need of conversion to open surgery. In conclusion, our results confirm that it is the time to include robotic surgery in the emergency setting. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6708993/ /pubmed/31348226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016010 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Milone, M. Vertaldi, S. Bracale, U. D’Ambra, M. Cassese, G. Manigrasso, M. De Palma, G.D. Robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Three case reports |
title | Robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Three case reports |
title_full | Robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Three case reports |
title_fullStr | Robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Three case reports |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Three case reports |
title_short | Robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Three case reports |
title_sort | robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: three case reports |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31348226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milonem roboticcholecystectomyforacutecholecystitisthreecasereports AT vertaldis roboticcholecystectomyforacutecholecystitisthreecasereports AT bracaleu roboticcholecystectomyforacutecholecystitisthreecasereports AT dambram roboticcholecystectomyforacutecholecystitisthreecasereports AT casseseg roboticcholecystectomyforacutecholecystitisthreecasereports AT manigrassom roboticcholecystectomyforacutecholecystitisthreecasereports AT depalmagd roboticcholecystectomyforacutecholecystitisthreecasereports |