Cargando…

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The global prevalence of Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is estimated to be as high as 15% and a number of different non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments have been used to manage IBS in clinical practice, which poses great challenges for clinicians to make appropriate decisi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Shenghui, Liu, Xiaoli, Wang, Xiaoxia, Xi, Fenglin, Luo, Xiaoke, Yao, Liang, Tang, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31348246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016446
_version_ 1783446107341193216
author Zhou, Shenghui
Liu, Xiaoli
Wang, Xiaoxia
Xi, Fenglin
Luo, Xiaoke
Yao, Liang
Tang, Hao
author_facet Zhou, Shenghui
Liu, Xiaoli
Wang, Xiaoxia
Xi, Fenglin
Luo, Xiaoke
Yao, Liang
Tang, Hao
author_sort Zhou, Shenghui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The global prevalence of Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is estimated to be as high as 15% and a number of different non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments have been used to manage IBS in clinical practice, which poses great challenges for clinicians to make appropriate decisions. Hence, a systematic review and network meta-analysis on all available pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for IBS is needed to provide reliable evidence. METHODS: We will search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Chinese Biomedical medicine (CBM) from inception to 31, May 2019. Randomized controlled trials of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for IBS will be included. Study quality will be assessed on the basis of the methodology and categories described in the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. Primary outcomes are global or clinical improvement and quality of life. A Bayesian network meta-analysis would be performed, and relative ranking of agents would be assessed. A node splitting method will be used to examine the inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons when a loop connecting 3 arms exists. RESULTS: Researchers will rank the effectiveness and safety of the potentials interventions for IBS according the characteristics of patients by conducting an advanced network meta-analysis based on Bayesian statistical model, and interpret the results by using GRADE approach. CONCLUSION: The conclusion of our study will provide updated evidence to rank the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for IBS. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not applicable since this study is a network meta-analysis based on published trials. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018083844.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6709000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67090002019-10-01 Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis Zhou, Shenghui Liu, Xiaoli Wang, Xiaoxia Xi, Fenglin Luo, Xiaoke Yao, Liang Tang, Hao Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: The global prevalence of Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is estimated to be as high as 15% and a number of different non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments have been used to manage IBS in clinical practice, which poses great challenges for clinicians to make appropriate decisions. Hence, a systematic review and network meta-analysis on all available pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for IBS is needed to provide reliable evidence. METHODS: We will search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Chinese Biomedical medicine (CBM) from inception to 31, May 2019. Randomized controlled trials of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for IBS will be included. Study quality will be assessed on the basis of the methodology and categories described in the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. Primary outcomes are global or clinical improvement and quality of life. A Bayesian network meta-analysis would be performed, and relative ranking of agents would be assessed. A node splitting method will be used to examine the inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons when a loop connecting 3 arms exists. RESULTS: Researchers will rank the effectiveness and safety of the potentials interventions for IBS according the characteristics of patients by conducting an advanced network meta-analysis based on Bayesian statistical model, and interpret the results by using GRADE approach. CONCLUSION: The conclusion of our study will provide updated evidence to rank the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for IBS. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not applicable since this study is a network meta-analysis based on published trials. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018083844. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6709000/ /pubmed/31348246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016446 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhou, Shenghui
Liu, Xiaoli
Wang, Xiaoxia
Xi, Fenglin
Luo, Xiaoke
Yao, Liang
Tang, Hao
Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31348246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016446
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoushenghui pharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicaltreatmentsforirritablebowelsyndromeprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT liuxiaoli pharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicaltreatmentsforirritablebowelsyndromeprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangxiaoxia pharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicaltreatmentsforirritablebowelsyndromeprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT xifenglin pharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicaltreatmentsforirritablebowelsyndromeprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT luoxiaoke pharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicaltreatmentsforirritablebowelsyndromeprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT yaoliang pharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicaltreatmentsforirritablebowelsyndromeprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT tanghao pharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicaltreatmentsforirritablebowelsyndromeprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis