Cargando…
Socioeconomic status and self-rated health in China: Findings from a cross-sectional study
To investigate whether socioeconomic status is associated with the self-rated health (SRH) status among Chinese. A cross sectional study including a national sample was conducted among Chinese adults in 2008. In total, 3225 participants were selected by a multistage cluster sampling method. Both gen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30896641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014904 |
_version_ | 1783446120167374848 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Tong Jiang, Yan Gamber, Michelle Ali, Gholam Xu, Tan Sun, Wenjie |
author_facet | Yu, Tong Jiang, Yan Gamber, Michelle Ali, Gholam Xu, Tan Sun, Wenjie |
author_sort | Yu, Tong |
collection | PubMed |
description | To investigate whether socioeconomic status is associated with the self-rated health (SRH) status among Chinese. A cross sectional study including a national sample was conducted among Chinese adults in 2008. In total, 3225 participants were selected by a multistage cluster sampling method. Both general self-rated health and time-comparative self-rated health were measured by a standardized questionnaire. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals, CIs) of occupation with SRH by occupation, and adjusted for age, sex, education, area, marriage, smoking, drinking, and health status. Overall, 34.4% of study participants reported “good” on the general SRH (male: 35.8%; female: 32.9%) and 26.2% reported “good” on the time-comparative SRH (male: 27.2%; female: 25.3%). The prevalence of “good” general SRH varied from 28.8% to 52.8% and the prevalence of time-comparative SHR varied from 21.7% to 33.9% in different occupations. The adjusted OR (Odd Ratio) for “good” on the general SRH was 1.35 (95% CI: 1.20–1.52) for the occupation of civil servants, 2.23 (95% CI: 1.96–2.54) for farmers, and 1.15 (95%CI: 1.01–1.31) for businessmen. The full adjusted OR of “good” on the time-comparative SRH was 1.36 (95% CI: 1.17–1.58) for students and was 1.25 (95% CI: 1.10–1.42) for civil servants. In presented study, 34.4% of the participants reported “good” on the general SRH, and 26.2% participants reported “good” on the time-comparative SRH. The prevalence of “good” general SRH and “good” time-comparative SRH varied among occupations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6709055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67090552019-10-01 Socioeconomic status and self-rated health in China: Findings from a cross-sectional study Yu, Tong Jiang, Yan Gamber, Michelle Ali, Gholam Xu, Tan Sun, Wenjie Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article To investigate whether socioeconomic status is associated with the self-rated health (SRH) status among Chinese. A cross sectional study including a national sample was conducted among Chinese adults in 2008. In total, 3225 participants were selected by a multistage cluster sampling method. Both general self-rated health and time-comparative self-rated health were measured by a standardized questionnaire. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals, CIs) of occupation with SRH by occupation, and adjusted for age, sex, education, area, marriage, smoking, drinking, and health status. Overall, 34.4% of study participants reported “good” on the general SRH (male: 35.8%; female: 32.9%) and 26.2% reported “good” on the time-comparative SRH (male: 27.2%; female: 25.3%). The prevalence of “good” general SRH varied from 28.8% to 52.8% and the prevalence of time-comparative SHR varied from 21.7% to 33.9% in different occupations. The adjusted OR (Odd Ratio) for “good” on the general SRH was 1.35 (95% CI: 1.20–1.52) for the occupation of civil servants, 2.23 (95% CI: 1.96–2.54) for farmers, and 1.15 (95%CI: 1.01–1.31) for businessmen. The full adjusted OR of “good” on the time-comparative SRH was 1.36 (95% CI: 1.17–1.58) for students and was 1.25 (95% CI: 1.10–1.42) for civil servants. In presented study, 34.4% of the participants reported “good” on the general SRH, and 26.2% participants reported “good” on the time-comparative SRH. The prevalence of “good” general SRH and “good” time-comparative SRH varied among occupations. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6709055/ /pubmed/30896641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014904 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yu, Tong Jiang, Yan Gamber, Michelle Ali, Gholam Xu, Tan Sun, Wenjie Socioeconomic status and self-rated health in China: Findings from a cross-sectional study |
title | Socioeconomic status and self-rated health in China: Findings from a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Socioeconomic status and self-rated health in China: Findings from a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Socioeconomic status and self-rated health in China: Findings from a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Socioeconomic status and self-rated health in China: Findings from a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Socioeconomic status and self-rated health in China: Findings from a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | socioeconomic status and self-rated health in china: findings from a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30896641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014904 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yutong socioeconomicstatusandselfratedhealthinchinafindingsfromacrosssectionalstudy AT jiangyan socioeconomicstatusandselfratedhealthinchinafindingsfromacrosssectionalstudy AT gambermichelle socioeconomicstatusandselfratedhealthinchinafindingsfromacrosssectionalstudy AT aligholam socioeconomicstatusandselfratedhealthinchinafindingsfromacrosssectionalstudy AT xutan socioeconomicstatusandselfratedhealthinchinafindingsfromacrosssectionalstudy AT sunwenjie socioeconomicstatusandselfratedhealthinchinafindingsfromacrosssectionalstudy |