Cargando…

Immobilization in external rotation vs internal rotation after shoulder dislocation: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BACKGROUND: Dislocation of shoulder joint is the most prone to occurrence in all joints of human body, which is common in young people and has a high recurrence rate. It is mainly treated by conservative treatment. External rotation and internal rotation fixation are 2 common conservative therapies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Xin, Liang, Long, Zhang, Hongyan, Zhao, Jing, Li, Yongyao, Cheng, Hao, Wang, Shiheng, Zhang, Yue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31393375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016707
_version_ 1783446120406450176
author Cui, Xin
Liang, Long
Zhang, Hongyan
Zhao, Jing
Li, Yongyao
Cheng, Hao
Wang, Shiheng
Zhang, Yue
author_facet Cui, Xin
Liang, Long
Zhang, Hongyan
Zhao, Jing
Li, Yongyao
Cheng, Hao
Wang, Shiheng
Zhang, Yue
author_sort Cui, Xin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dislocation of shoulder joint is the most prone to occurrence in all joints of human body, which is common in young people and has a high recurrence rate. It is mainly treated by conservative treatment. External rotation and internal rotation fixation are 2 common conservative therapies in clinical practice. Therefore, we conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the 2 treatments. METHODS: Nine electronic databases, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, Wanfang Database and VIP Database, will be searched to find and include randomized controlled trials that meet inclusion criteria. RevMan5.3 will be used for data analysis and synthesis in this study. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will also be performed if necessary. In addition, GRADE will be used in the evaluation of evidence hierarchy. RESULTS: This study will analyze and integrate the original evidence so far for clinical efficacy and safety of immobilization in external rotation and internal rotation on shoulder dislocation. CONCLUSION: The conclusion of this study will conclude higher evidence and suggestions for the treatment of shoulder dislocation, so as to further guide clinical decision making. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018106030.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6709056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67090562019-10-01 Immobilization in external rotation vs internal rotation after shoulder dislocation: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol Cui, Xin Liang, Long Zhang, Hongyan Zhao, Jing Li, Yongyao Cheng, Hao Wang, Shiheng Zhang, Yue Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Dislocation of shoulder joint is the most prone to occurrence in all joints of human body, which is common in young people and has a high recurrence rate. It is mainly treated by conservative treatment. External rotation and internal rotation fixation are 2 common conservative therapies in clinical practice. Therefore, we conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the 2 treatments. METHODS: Nine electronic databases, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, Wanfang Database and VIP Database, will be searched to find and include randomized controlled trials that meet inclusion criteria. RevMan5.3 will be used for data analysis and synthesis in this study. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will also be performed if necessary. In addition, GRADE will be used in the evaluation of evidence hierarchy. RESULTS: This study will analyze and integrate the original evidence so far for clinical efficacy and safety of immobilization in external rotation and internal rotation on shoulder dislocation. CONCLUSION: The conclusion of this study will conclude higher evidence and suggestions for the treatment of shoulder dislocation, so as to further guide clinical decision making. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018106030. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6709056/ /pubmed/31393375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016707 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Cui, Xin
Liang, Long
Zhang, Hongyan
Zhao, Jing
Li, Yongyao
Cheng, Hao
Wang, Shiheng
Zhang, Yue
Immobilization in external rotation vs internal rotation after shoulder dislocation: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
title Immobilization in external rotation vs internal rotation after shoulder dislocation: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
title_full Immobilization in external rotation vs internal rotation after shoulder dislocation: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
title_fullStr Immobilization in external rotation vs internal rotation after shoulder dislocation: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
title_full_unstemmed Immobilization in external rotation vs internal rotation after shoulder dislocation: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
title_short Immobilization in external rotation vs internal rotation after shoulder dislocation: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
title_sort immobilization in external rotation vs internal rotation after shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31393375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016707
work_keys_str_mv AT cuixin immobilizationinexternalrotationvsinternalrotationaftershoulderdislocationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT lianglong immobilizationinexternalrotationvsinternalrotationaftershoulderdislocationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT zhanghongyan immobilizationinexternalrotationvsinternalrotationaftershoulderdislocationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT zhaojing immobilizationinexternalrotationvsinternalrotationaftershoulderdislocationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT liyongyao immobilizationinexternalrotationvsinternalrotationaftershoulderdislocationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT chenghao immobilizationinexternalrotationvsinternalrotationaftershoulderdislocationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT wangshiheng immobilizationinexternalrotationvsinternalrotationaftershoulderdislocationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT zhangyue immobilizationinexternalrotationvsinternalrotationaftershoulderdislocationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol