Cargando…
Comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol
BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common ligament injury to the knee joint, and often lead to limited function, osteoarthritis after knee trauma, secondary damage to meniscus and cartilage, and impaired quality of life. ACL reconstruction is the gold standard surgical treatmen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30896646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014911 |
_version_ | 1783446147793158144 |
---|---|
author | Jin, Jiaxin Yu, Liping Wei, Min Shang, Yi Wang, Xin |
author_facet | Jin, Jiaxin Yu, Liping Wei, Min Shang, Yi Wang, Xin |
author_sort | Jin, Jiaxin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common ligament injury to the knee joint, and often lead to limited function, osteoarthritis after knee trauma, secondary damage to meniscus and cartilage, and impaired quality of life. ACL reconstruction is the gold standard surgical treatment for ACL injury, and ligament fixation after reconstruction is the key factor of ACL reconstruction success. However, the optimal fixation device for ACL reconstruction remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different fixation devices and to find the best fixation device for ACL reconstruction. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Chinese Biomedicine Literature will be searched to identify relevant studies from inception to December 2018. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of different fixation devices fixed on the femoral side in arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction. Risk of bias assessment of the included RCTs will be conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0. A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) will be performed using R software. RESULTS: The results of this NMA will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. CONCLUSION: This NMA will summarize the direct and indirect evidence to evaluate the effect of different fixation devices for ACL reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6709171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67091712019-10-01 Comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol Jin, Jiaxin Yu, Liping Wei, Min Shang, Yi Wang, Xin Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common ligament injury to the knee joint, and often lead to limited function, osteoarthritis after knee trauma, secondary damage to meniscus and cartilage, and impaired quality of life. ACL reconstruction is the gold standard surgical treatment for ACL injury, and ligament fixation after reconstruction is the key factor of ACL reconstruction success. However, the optimal fixation device for ACL reconstruction remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different fixation devices and to find the best fixation device for ACL reconstruction. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Chinese Biomedicine Literature will be searched to identify relevant studies from inception to December 2018. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of different fixation devices fixed on the femoral side in arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction. Risk of bias assessment of the included RCTs will be conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0. A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) will be performed using R software. RESULTS: The results of this NMA will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. CONCLUSION: This NMA will summarize the direct and indirect evidence to evaluate the effect of different fixation devices for ACL reconstruction. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6709171/ /pubmed/30896646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014911 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jin, Jiaxin Yu, Liping Wei, Min Shang, Yi Wang, Xin Comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol |
title | Comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol |
title_full | Comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol |
title_fullStr | Comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol |
title_short | Comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol |
title_sort | comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a bayesian network meta-analysis protocol |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30896646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014911 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jinjiaxin comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofdifferentfixationdevicesforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT yuliping comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofdifferentfixationdevicesforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT weimin comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofdifferentfixationdevicesforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT shangyi comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofdifferentfixationdevicesforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT wangxin comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofdifferentfixationdevicesforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisprotocol |