Cargando…

Comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common ligament injury to the knee joint, and often lead to limited function, osteoarthritis after knee trauma, secondary damage to meniscus and cartilage, and impaired quality of life. ACL reconstruction is the gold standard surgical treatmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Jiaxin, Yu, Liping, Wei, Min, Shang, Yi, Wang, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30896646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014911
_version_ 1783446147793158144
author Jin, Jiaxin
Yu, Liping
Wei, Min
Shang, Yi
Wang, Xin
author_facet Jin, Jiaxin
Yu, Liping
Wei, Min
Shang, Yi
Wang, Xin
author_sort Jin, Jiaxin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common ligament injury to the knee joint, and often lead to limited function, osteoarthritis after knee trauma, secondary damage to meniscus and cartilage, and impaired quality of life. ACL reconstruction is the gold standard surgical treatment for ACL injury, and ligament fixation after reconstruction is the key factor of ACL reconstruction success. However, the optimal fixation device for ACL reconstruction remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different fixation devices and to find the best fixation device for ACL reconstruction. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Chinese Biomedicine Literature will be searched to identify relevant studies from inception to December 2018. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of different fixation devices fixed on the femoral side in arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction. Risk of bias assessment of the included RCTs will be conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0. A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) will be performed using R software. RESULTS: The results of this NMA will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. CONCLUSION: This NMA will summarize the direct and indirect evidence to evaluate the effect of different fixation devices for ACL reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6709171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67091712019-10-01 Comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol Jin, Jiaxin Yu, Liping Wei, Min Shang, Yi Wang, Xin Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common ligament injury to the knee joint, and often lead to limited function, osteoarthritis after knee trauma, secondary damage to meniscus and cartilage, and impaired quality of life. ACL reconstruction is the gold standard surgical treatment for ACL injury, and ligament fixation after reconstruction is the key factor of ACL reconstruction success. However, the optimal fixation device for ACL reconstruction remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different fixation devices and to find the best fixation device for ACL reconstruction. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Chinese Biomedicine Literature will be searched to identify relevant studies from inception to December 2018. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of different fixation devices fixed on the femoral side in arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction. Risk of bias assessment of the included RCTs will be conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0. A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) will be performed using R software. RESULTS: The results of this NMA will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. CONCLUSION: This NMA will summarize the direct and indirect evidence to evaluate the effect of different fixation devices for ACL reconstruction. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6709171/ /pubmed/30896646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014911 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Jin, Jiaxin
Yu, Liping
Wei, Min
Shang, Yi
Wang, Xin
Comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol
title Comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol
title_full Comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol
title_fullStr Comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol
title_short Comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol
title_sort comparison of efficacy and safety of different fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a bayesian network meta-analysis protocol
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30896646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014911
work_keys_str_mv AT jinjiaxin comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofdifferentfixationdevicesforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT yuliping comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofdifferentfixationdevicesforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT weimin comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofdifferentfixationdevicesforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT shangyi comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofdifferentfixationdevicesforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT wangxin comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofdifferentfixationdevicesforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisprotocol