Cargando…
Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for endometriosis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol
BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a common disease of women of childbearing age. In recent years, the incidence of endometriosis has been on the rise. The main clinical manifestations are pelvic pain and infertility. In recent years, traditional Chinese patent medicine (TCMP) has played an important role...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31335707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016473 |
_version_ | 1783446150414598144 |
---|---|
author | Dong, Shuangqian Zhang, Jianwei Zhai, Fengting Zhao, Xinglong Qin, Xiuyun |
author_facet | Dong, Shuangqian Zhang, Jianwei Zhai, Fengting Zhao, Xinglong Qin, Xiuyun |
author_sort | Dong, Shuangqian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a common disease of women of childbearing age. In recent years, the incidence of endometriosis has been on the rise. The main clinical manifestations are pelvic pain and infertility. In recent years, traditional Chinese patent medicine (TCMP) has played an important role in the treatment of endometriosis. So far, there is a lack of comparison among all the current common TCPMs for endometriosis. Consequently, it is indispensable to propose a network meta-analysis (NMA) protocol to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of different TCMPs. METHODS: We will comprehensively and systematically retrieve the relevant Chinese and English databases from their inceptions to the May 2019. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TCMPs for Endometriosis will be included. Two researchers will independently screen literature, extract data and assess the risk of bias of included studies. We will conduct pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian network meta-analyses to assess all the available evidence. Data will be analyzed using STATA and WinBUGS software. RESULTS: This work will compare and rank the relative efficacy of different TCPMs in the treatment of endometriosis in detail. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will provide reliable evidence for the selection of clinical treatment program and guideline development. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019127781. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6709182 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67091822019-10-01 Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for endometriosis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol Dong, Shuangqian Zhang, Jianwei Zhai, Fengting Zhao, Xinglong Qin, Xiuyun Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a common disease of women of childbearing age. In recent years, the incidence of endometriosis has been on the rise. The main clinical manifestations are pelvic pain and infertility. In recent years, traditional Chinese patent medicine (TCMP) has played an important role in the treatment of endometriosis. So far, there is a lack of comparison among all the current common TCPMs for endometriosis. Consequently, it is indispensable to propose a network meta-analysis (NMA) protocol to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of different TCMPs. METHODS: We will comprehensively and systematically retrieve the relevant Chinese and English databases from their inceptions to the May 2019. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TCMPs for Endometriosis will be included. Two researchers will independently screen literature, extract data and assess the risk of bias of included studies. We will conduct pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian network meta-analyses to assess all the available evidence. Data will be analyzed using STATA and WinBUGS software. RESULTS: This work will compare and rank the relative efficacy of different TCPMs in the treatment of endometriosis in detail. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will provide reliable evidence for the selection of clinical treatment program and guideline development. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019127781. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6709182/ /pubmed/31335707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016473 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dong, Shuangqian Zhang, Jianwei Zhai, Fengting Zhao, Xinglong Qin, Xiuyun Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for endometriosis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol |
title | Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for endometriosis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol |
title_full | Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for endometriosis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for endometriosis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for endometriosis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol |
title_short | Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for endometriosis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol |
title_sort | comparative efficacy and safety of traditional chinese patent medicine for endometriosis: a bayesian network meta-analysis protocol |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31335707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016473 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dongshuangqian comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineforendometriosisabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT zhangjianwei comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineforendometriosisabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT zhaifengting comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineforendometriosisabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT zhaoxinglong comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineforendometriosisabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT qinxiuyun comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineforendometriosisabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisprotocol |