Cargando…

Evaluation of Diffusion Anisotropy and Diffusion Shape in Grading of Glial Tumors

BACKGROUND: The most common primary tumors of brain are gliomas. Grading of tumor is vital for designing proper treatment plans. The gold standard choice to determine the grade of glial tumor is biopsy which is an invasive method. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we try to investigate the role of fractiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: F., Davanian, F., Faeghi, S., Shahzadi, Z., Farshidfar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31531299
http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.513
_version_ 1783446190745976832
author F., Davanian
F., Faeghi
S., Shahzadi
Z., Farshidfar
author_facet F., Davanian
F., Faeghi
S., Shahzadi
Z., Farshidfar
author_sort F., Davanian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The most common primary tumors of brain are gliomas. Grading of tumor is vital for designing proper treatment plans. The gold standard choice to determine the grade of glial tumor is biopsy which is an invasive method. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we try to investigate the role of fractional anisotropy (diffusion anisotropy) and linear anisotropy coefficient (its shape) with the aim of Diffusion Tensor imaging (as a non-invasive method) in the grading of gliomas. METHODS: A group of 20 patients with histologically glial approved was evaluated. In this study, we used a 1.5-Tesla MR system (AVANTO; Siemens, Germany) with a standard head coil for scanning. Multi-directional diffusion weighted imaging (measured in 12 non-collinear directions) and T1 weighted non-enhanced were performed for all patients. We defined two Regions of Interest (ROIs); white matter adjacent to the tumor and the homologous fiber tracts to the first ROI in the contralateral hemisphere. RESULTS: Linear anisotropy coefficient (CL), fractional anisotropy (FA) values and ratios of low-grade peri-tumoral fiber tracts were higher than high-grade gliomas (P-value CL(t)=0.014, P-value CL(t/n)=0.019 and P-value FA(t)=0.006, P-value FA(t/n)=0.024). In addition, we perform ROC curve for each parameter (CL ratio-AUC = 0.82 and FA ratio-AUC = 0.868). CONCLUSION: Our findings prove significant difference between diffusion anisotropy (FA) and diffusion shape (Cl) between low grade and high grade glioma, based on which we find this evaluation helpful in the grading of glial tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6709352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67093522019-09-17 Evaluation of Diffusion Anisotropy and Diffusion Shape in Grading of Glial Tumors F., Davanian F., Faeghi S., Shahzadi Z., Farshidfar J Biomed Phys Eng Original Article BACKGROUND: The most common primary tumors of brain are gliomas. Grading of tumor is vital for designing proper treatment plans. The gold standard choice to determine the grade of glial tumor is biopsy which is an invasive method. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we try to investigate the role of fractional anisotropy (diffusion anisotropy) and linear anisotropy coefficient (its shape) with the aim of Diffusion Tensor imaging (as a non-invasive method) in the grading of gliomas. METHODS: A group of 20 patients with histologically glial approved was evaluated. In this study, we used a 1.5-Tesla MR system (AVANTO; Siemens, Germany) with a standard head coil for scanning. Multi-directional diffusion weighted imaging (measured in 12 non-collinear directions) and T1 weighted non-enhanced were performed for all patients. We defined two Regions of Interest (ROIs); white matter adjacent to the tumor and the homologous fiber tracts to the first ROI in the contralateral hemisphere. RESULTS: Linear anisotropy coefficient (CL), fractional anisotropy (FA) values and ratios of low-grade peri-tumoral fiber tracts were higher than high-grade gliomas (P-value CL(t)=0.014, P-value CL(t/n)=0.019 and P-value FA(t)=0.006, P-value FA(t/n)=0.024). In addition, we perform ROC curve for each parameter (CL ratio-AUC = 0.82 and FA ratio-AUC = 0.868). CONCLUSION: Our findings prove significant difference between diffusion anisotropy (FA) and diffusion shape (Cl) between low grade and high grade glioma, based on which we find this evaluation helpful in the grading of glial tumors. Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering 2019-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6709352/ /pubmed/31531299 http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.513 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
F., Davanian
F., Faeghi
S., Shahzadi
Z., Farshidfar
Evaluation of Diffusion Anisotropy and Diffusion Shape in Grading of Glial Tumors
title Evaluation of Diffusion Anisotropy and Diffusion Shape in Grading of Glial Tumors
title_full Evaluation of Diffusion Anisotropy and Diffusion Shape in Grading of Glial Tumors
title_fullStr Evaluation of Diffusion Anisotropy and Diffusion Shape in Grading of Glial Tumors
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Diffusion Anisotropy and Diffusion Shape in Grading of Glial Tumors
title_short Evaluation of Diffusion Anisotropy and Diffusion Shape in Grading of Glial Tumors
title_sort evaluation of diffusion anisotropy and diffusion shape in grading of glial tumors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31531299
http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.513
work_keys_str_mv AT fdavanian evaluationofdiffusionanisotropyanddiffusionshapeingradingofglialtumors
AT ffaeghi evaluationofdiffusionanisotropyanddiffusionshapeingradingofglialtumors
AT sshahzadi evaluationofdiffusionanisotropyanddiffusionshapeingradingofglialtumors
AT zfarshidfar evaluationofdiffusionanisotropyanddiffusionshapeingradingofglialtumors