Cargando…

Social distance modulates the process of uncertain decision-making: evidence from event-related potentials

PURPOSE: Social distance affects risk perception in uncertain decision-making, but how this effect works and the mechanism of how social distance influences the early processing stages of uncertain decision-making are still unclear. This investigation aimed to explore how social distance influences...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Huan, Song, Hang, Liu, Yuanyuan, Xu, Kai, Shen, Heyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31686926
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S210910
_version_ 1783446212155801600
author Guo, Huan
Song, Hang
Liu, Yuanyuan
Xu, Kai
Shen, Heyong
author_facet Guo, Huan
Song, Hang
Liu, Yuanyuan
Xu, Kai
Shen, Heyong
author_sort Guo, Huan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Social distance affects risk perception in uncertain decision-making, but how this effect works and the mechanism of how social distance influences the early processing stages of uncertain decision-making are still unclear. This investigation aimed to explore how social distance influences risk-taking during uncertain decision-making using the Iowa Gambling Task with recording of event-related potentials. METHODS: A total of 57 healthy subjects (36 female) participated in the modified single-choice Iowa Gambling Task when they gambled based on three quantified social distances (self, friend, and stranger). The social distance between participant and beneficiary was quantified on a scale of 0–100 points, with 0 representing self, 5 representing a close friend, and 100 representing a stranger. RESULTS: Three stages of uncertain decision-making were analyzed. Behavioral results showed that social distance worked interactively with choice frame, and high social distance made people choose a more advantageous deck and a less disadvantageous deck than low social distance. The P300 in the choice-evaluation stage, which reflects stimulus discrimination, directly proved this result by showing that gambling for a stranger caused higher P300 when evaluating an advantageous deck and lower P300 when evaluating a disadvantageous deck than for others. Decision preceding negativity in the response-selection stage represents the anticipation of risky choices: this was larger with high social distance when choosing a disadvantageous deck. Feedback-related negativity and feedback-related P300 had motivational significance, showing smaller amplitudes when gambling for a stranger than for oneself. CONCLUSION: These results provide evidence that social distance works interactively with choice frames of uncertain decision-making. People at high social distance are more risk-taking in an advantageous frame and more risk-avoid ant in a disadvantageous frame.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6709518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67095182019-11-04 Social distance modulates the process of uncertain decision-making: evidence from event-related potentials Guo, Huan Song, Hang Liu, Yuanyuan Xu, Kai Shen, Heyong Psychol Res Behav Manag Original Research PURPOSE: Social distance affects risk perception in uncertain decision-making, but how this effect works and the mechanism of how social distance influences the early processing stages of uncertain decision-making are still unclear. This investigation aimed to explore how social distance influences risk-taking during uncertain decision-making using the Iowa Gambling Task with recording of event-related potentials. METHODS: A total of 57 healthy subjects (36 female) participated in the modified single-choice Iowa Gambling Task when they gambled based on three quantified social distances (self, friend, and stranger). The social distance between participant and beneficiary was quantified on a scale of 0–100 points, with 0 representing self, 5 representing a close friend, and 100 representing a stranger. RESULTS: Three stages of uncertain decision-making were analyzed. Behavioral results showed that social distance worked interactively with choice frame, and high social distance made people choose a more advantageous deck and a less disadvantageous deck than low social distance. The P300 in the choice-evaluation stage, which reflects stimulus discrimination, directly proved this result by showing that gambling for a stranger caused higher P300 when evaluating an advantageous deck and lower P300 when evaluating a disadvantageous deck than for others. Decision preceding negativity in the response-selection stage represents the anticipation of risky choices: this was larger with high social distance when choosing a disadvantageous deck. Feedback-related negativity and feedback-related P300 had motivational significance, showing smaller amplitudes when gambling for a stranger than for oneself. CONCLUSION: These results provide evidence that social distance works interactively with choice frames of uncertain decision-making. People at high social distance are more risk-taking in an advantageous frame and more risk-avoid ant in a disadvantageous frame. Dove 2019-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6709518/ /pubmed/31686926 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S210910 Text en © 2019 Guo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Guo, Huan
Song, Hang
Liu, Yuanyuan
Xu, Kai
Shen, Heyong
Social distance modulates the process of uncertain decision-making: evidence from event-related potentials
title Social distance modulates the process of uncertain decision-making: evidence from event-related potentials
title_full Social distance modulates the process of uncertain decision-making: evidence from event-related potentials
title_fullStr Social distance modulates the process of uncertain decision-making: evidence from event-related potentials
title_full_unstemmed Social distance modulates the process of uncertain decision-making: evidence from event-related potentials
title_short Social distance modulates the process of uncertain decision-making: evidence from event-related potentials
title_sort social distance modulates the process of uncertain decision-making: evidence from event-related potentials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31686926
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S210910
work_keys_str_mv AT guohuan socialdistancemodulatestheprocessofuncertaindecisionmakingevidencefromeventrelatedpotentials
AT songhang socialdistancemodulatestheprocessofuncertaindecisionmakingevidencefromeventrelatedpotentials
AT liuyuanyuan socialdistancemodulatestheprocessofuncertaindecisionmakingevidencefromeventrelatedpotentials
AT xukai socialdistancemodulatestheprocessofuncertaindecisionmakingevidencefromeventrelatedpotentials
AT shenheyong socialdistancemodulatestheprocessofuncertaindecisionmakingevidencefromeventrelatedpotentials