Cargando…
Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation
BACKGROUND: CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology has facilitated the generation of knockout mice, providing an alternative to cumbersome and time-consuming traditional embryonic stem cell-based methods. An earlier study reported up to 16% efficiency in generating conditional knockout (cKO or floxed)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31446895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1776-2 |
_version_ | 1783446217078865920 |
---|---|
author | Gurumurthy, Channabasavaiah B. O’Brien, Aidan R. Quadros, Rolen M. Adams, John Alcaide, Pilar Ayabe, Shinya Ballard, Johnathan Batra, Surinder K. Beauchamp, Marie-Claude Becker, Kathleen A. Bernas, Guillaume Brough, David Carrillo-Salinas, Francisco Chan, Wesley Chen, Hanying Dawson, Ruby DeMambro, Victoria D’Hont, Jinke Dibb, Katharine M. Eudy, James D. Gan, Lin Gao, Jing Gonzales, Amy Guntur, Anyonya R. Guo, Huiping Harms, Donald W. Harrington, Anne Hentges, Kathryn E. Humphreys, Neil Imai, Shiho Ishii, Hideshi Iwama, Mizuho Jonasch, Eric Karolak, Michelle Keavney, Bernard Khin, Nay-Chi Konno, Masamitsu Kotani, Yuko Kunihiro, Yayoi Lakshmanan, Imayavaramban Larochelle, Catherine Lawrence, Catherine B. Li, Lin Lindner, Volkhard Liu, Xian-De Lopez-Castejon, Gloria Loudon, Andrew Lowe, Jenna Jerome-Majewska, Loydie A. Matsusaka, Taiji Miura, Hiromi Miyasaka, Yoshiki Morpurgo, Benjamin Motyl, Katherine Nabeshima, Yo-ichi Nakade, Koji Nakashiba, Toshiaki Nakashima, Kenichi Obata, Yuichi Ogiwara, Sanae Ouellet, Mariette Oxburgh, Leif Piltz, Sandra Pinz, Ilka Ponnusamy, Moorthy P. Ray, David Redder, Ronald J. Rosen, Clifford J. Ross, Nikki Ruhe, Mark T. Ryzhova, Larisa Salvador, Ane M. Alam, Sabrina Shameen Sedlacek, Radislav Sharma, Karan Smith, Chad Staes, Katrien Starrs, Lora Sugiyama, Fumihiro Takahashi, Satoru Tanaka, Tomohiro Trafford, Andrew W. Uno, Yoshihiro Vanhoutte, Leen Vanrockeghem, Frederique Willis, Brandon J. Wright, Christian S. Yamauchi, Yuko Yi, Xin Yoshimi, Kazuto Zhang, Xuesong Zhang, Yu Ohtsuka, Masato Das, Satyabrata Garry, Daniel J. Hochepied, Tino Thomas, Paul Parker-Thornburg, Jan Adamson, Antony D. Yoshiki, Atsushi Schmouth, Jean-Francois Golovko, Andrei Thompson, William R. Lloyd, K. C. Kent Wood, Joshua A. Cowan, Mitra Mashimo, Tomoji Mizuno, Seiya Zhu, Hao Kasparek, Petr Liaw, Lucy Miano, Joseph M. Burgio, Gaetan |
author_facet | Gurumurthy, Channabasavaiah B. O’Brien, Aidan R. Quadros, Rolen M. Adams, John Alcaide, Pilar Ayabe, Shinya Ballard, Johnathan Batra, Surinder K. Beauchamp, Marie-Claude Becker, Kathleen A. Bernas, Guillaume Brough, David Carrillo-Salinas, Francisco Chan, Wesley Chen, Hanying Dawson, Ruby DeMambro, Victoria D’Hont, Jinke Dibb, Katharine M. Eudy, James D. Gan, Lin Gao, Jing Gonzales, Amy Guntur, Anyonya R. Guo, Huiping Harms, Donald W. Harrington, Anne Hentges, Kathryn E. Humphreys, Neil Imai, Shiho Ishii, Hideshi Iwama, Mizuho Jonasch, Eric Karolak, Michelle Keavney, Bernard Khin, Nay-Chi Konno, Masamitsu Kotani, Yuko Kunihiro, Yayoi Lakshmanan, Imayavaramban Larochelle, Catherine Lawrence, Catherine B. Li, Lin Lindner, Volkhard Liu, Xian-De Lopez-Castejon, Gloria Loudon, Andrew Lowe, Jenna Jerome-Majewska, Loydie A. Matsusaka, Taiji Miura, Hiromi Miyasaka, Yoshiki Morpurgo, Benjamin Motyl, Katherine Nabeshima, Yo-ichi Nakade, Koji Nakashiba, Toshiaki Nakashima, Kenichi Obata, Yuichi Ogiwara, Sanae Ouellet, Mariette Oxburgh, Leif Piltz, Sandra Pinz, Ilka Ponnusamy, Moorthy P. Ray, David Redder, Ronald J. Rosen, Clifford J. Ross, Nikki Ruhe, Mark T. Ryzhova, Larisa Salvador, Ane M. Alam, Sabrina Shameen Sedlacek, Radislav Sharma, Karan Smith, Chad Staes, Katrien Starrs, Lora Sugiyama, Fumihiro Takahashi, Satoru Tanaka, Tomohiro Trafford, Andrew W. Uno, Yoshihiro Vanhoutte, Leen Vanrockeghem, Frederique Willis, Brandon J. Wright, Christian S. Yamauchi, Yuko Yi, Xin Yoshimi, Kazuto Zhang, Xuesong Zhang, Yu Ohtsuka, Masato Das, Satyabrata Garry, Daniel J. Hochepied, Tino Thomas, Paul Parker-Thornburg, Jan Adamson, Antony D. Yoshiki, Atsushi Schmouth, Jean-Francois Golovko, Andrei Thompson, William R. Lloyd, K. C. Kent Wood, Joshua A. Cowan, Mitra Mashimo, Tomoji Mizuno, Seiya Zhu, Hao Kasparek, Petr Liaw, Lucy Miano, Joseph M. Burgio, Gaetan |
author_sort | Gurumurthy, Channabasavaiah B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology has facilitated the generation of knockout mice, providing an alternative to cumbersome and time-consuming traditional embryonic stem cell-based methods. An earlier study reported up to 16% efficiency in generating conditional knockout (cKO or floxed) alleles by microinjection of 2 single guide RNAs (sgRNA) and 2 single-stranded oligonucleotides as donors (referred herein as “two-donor floxing” method). RESULTS: We re-evaluate the two-donor method from a consortium of 20 laboratories across the world. The dataset constitutes 56 genetic loci, 17,887 zygotes, and 1718 live-born mice, of which only 15 (0.87%) mice contain cKO alleles. We subject the dataset to statistical analyses and a machine learning algorithm, which reveals that none of the factors analyzed was predictive for the success of this method. We test some of the newer methods that use one-donor DNA on 18 loci for which the two-donor approach failed to produce cKO alleles. We find that the one-donor methods are 10- to 20-fold more efficient than the two-donor approach. CONCLUSION: We propose that the two-donor method lacks efficiency because it relies on two simultaneous recombination events in cis, an outcome that is dwarfed by pervasive accompanying undesired editing events. The methods that use one-donor DNA are fairly efficient as they rely on only one recombination event, and the probability of correct insertion of the donor cassette without unanticipated mutational events is much higher. Therefore, one-donor methods offer higher efficiencies for the routine generation of cKO animal models. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13059-019-1776-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6709553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67095532019-08-28 Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation Gurumurthy, Channabasavaiah B. O’Brien, Aidan R. Quadros, Rolen M. Adams, John Alcaide, Pilar Ayabe, Shinya Ballard, Johnathan Batra, Surinder K. Beauchamp, Marie-Claude Becker, Kathleen A. Bernas, Guillaume Brough, David Carrillo-Salinas, Francisco Chan, Wesley Chen, Hanying Dawson, Ruby DeMambro, Victoria D’Hont, Jinke Dibb, Katharine M. Eudy, James D. Gan, Lin Gao, Jing Gonzales, Amy Guntur, Anyonya R. Guo, Huiping Harms, Donald W. Harrington, Anne Hentges, Kathryn E. Humphreys, Neil Imai, Shiho Ishii, Hideshi Iwama, Mizuho Jonasch, Eric Karolak, Michelle Keavney, Bernard Khin, Nay-Chi Konno, Masamitsu Kotani, Yuko Kunihiro, Yayoi Lakshmanan, Imayavaramban Larochelle, Catherine Lawrence, Catherine B. Li, Lin Lindner, Volkhard Liu, Xian-De Lopez-Castejon, Gloria Loudon, Andrew Lowe, Jenna Jerome-Majewska, Loydie A. Matsusaka, Taiji Miura, Hiromi Miyasaka, Yoshiki Morpurgo, Benjamin Motyl, Katherine Nabeshima, Yo-ichi Nakade, Koji Nakashiba, Toshiaki Nakashima, Kenichi Obata, Yuichi Ogiwara, Sanae Ouellet, Mariette Oxburgh, Leif Piltz, Sandra Pinz, Ilka Ponnusamy, Moorthy P. Ray, David Redder, Ronald J. Rosen, Clifford J. Ross, Nikki Ruhe, Mark T. Ryzhova, Larisa Salvador, Ane M. Alam, Sabrina Shameen Sedlacek, Radislav Sharma, Karan Smith, Chad Staes, Katrien Starrs, Lora Sugiyama, Fumihiro Takahashi, Satoru Tanaka, Tomohiro Trafford, Andrew W. Uno, Yoshihiro Vanhoutte, Leen Vanrockeghem, Frederique Willis, Brandon J. Wright, Christian S. Yamauchi, Yuko Yi, Xin Yoshimi, Kazuto Zhang, Xuesong Zhang, Yu Ohtsuka, Masato Das, Satyabrata Garry, Daniel J. Hochepied, Tino Thomas, Paul Parker-Thornburg, Jan Adamson, Antony D. Yoshiki, Atsushi Schmouth, Jean-Francois Golovko, Andrei Thompson, William R. Lloyd, K. C. Kent Wood, Joshua A. Cowan, Mitra Mashimo, Tomoji Mizuno, Seiya Zhu, Hao Kasparek, Petr Liaw, Lucy Miano, Joseph M. Burgio, Gaetan Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology has facilitated the generation of knockout mice, providing an alternative to cumbersome and time-consuming traditional embryonic stem cell-based methods. An earlier study reported up to 16% efficiency in generating conditional knockout (cKO or floxed) alleles by microinjection of 2 single guide RNAs (sgRNA) and 2 single-stranded oligonucleotides as donors (referred herein as “two-donor floxing” method). RESULTS: We re-evaluate the two-donor method from a consortium of 20 laboratories across the world. The dataset constitutes 56 genetic loci, 17,887 zygotes, and 1718 live-born mice, of which only 15 (0.87%) mice contain cKO alleles. We subject the dataset to statistical analyses and a machine learning algorithm, which reveals that none of the factors analyzed was predictive for the success of this method. We test some of the newer methods that use one-donor DNA on 18 loci for which the two-donor approach failed to produce cKO alleles. We find that the one-donor methods are 10- to 20-fold more efficient than the two-donor approach. CONCLUSION: We propose that the two-donor method lacks efficiency because it relies on two simultaneous recombination events in cis, an outcome that is dwarfed by pervasive accompanying undesired editing events. The methods that use one-donor DNA are fairly efficient as they rely on only one recombination event, and the probability of correct insertion of the donor cassette without unanticipated mutational events is much higher. Therefore, one-donor methods offer higher efficiencies for the routine generation of cKO animal models. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13059-019-1776-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6709553/ /pubmed/31446895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1776-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Gurumurthy, Channabasavaiah B. O’Brien, Aidan R. Quadros, Rolen M. Adams, John Alcaide, Pilar Ayabe, Shinya Ballard, Johnathan Batra, Surinder K. Beauchamp, Marie-Claude Becker, Kathleen A. Bernas, Guillaume Brough, David Carrillo-Salinas, Francisco Chan, Wesley Chen, Hanying Dawson, Ruby DeMambro, Victoria D’Hont, Jinke Dibb, Katharine M. Eudy, James D. Gan, Lin Gao, Jing Gonzales, Amy Guntur, Anyonya R. Guo, Huiping Harms, Donald W. Harrington, Anne Hentges, Kathryn E. Humphreys, Neil Imai, Shiho Ishii, Hideshi Iwama, Mizuho Jonasch, Eric Karolak, Michelle Keavney, Bernard Khin, Nay-Chi Konno, Masamitsu Kotani, Yuko Kunihiro, Yayoi Lakshmanan, Imayavaramban Larochelle, Catherine Lawrence, Catherine B. Li, Lin Lindner, Volkhard Liu, Xian-De Lopez-Castejon, Gloria Loudon, Andrew Lowe, Jenna Jerome-Majewska, Loydie A. Matsusaka, Taiji Miura, Hiromi Miyasaka, Yoshiki Morpurgo, Benjamin Motyl, Katherine Nabeshima, Yo-ichi Nakade, Koji Nakashiba, Toshiaki Nakashima, Kenichi Obata, Yuichi Ogiwara, Sanae Ouellet, Mariette Oxburgh, Leif Piltz, Sandra Pinz, Ilka Ponnusamy, Moorthy P. Ray, David Redder, Ronald J. Rosen, Clifford J. Ross, Nikki Ruhe, Mark T. Ryzhova, Larisa Salvador, Ane M. Alam, Sabrina Shameen Sedlacek, Radislav Sharma, Karan Smith, Chad Staes, Katrien Starrs, Lora Sugiyama, Fumihiro Takahashi, Satoru Tanaka, Tomohiro Trafford, Andrew W. Uno, Yoshihiro Vanhoutte, Leen Vanrockeghem, Frederique Willis, Brandon J. Wright, Christian S. Yamauchi, Yuko Yi, Xin Yoshimi, Kazuto Zhang, Xuesong Zhang, Yu Ohtsuka, Masato Das, Satyabrata Garry, Daniel J. Hochepied, Tino Thomas, Paul Parker-Thornburg, Jan Adamson, Antony D. Yoshiki, Atsushi Schmouth, Jean-Francois Golovko, Andrei Thompson, William R. Lloyd, K. C. Kent Wood, Joshua A. Cowan, Mitra Mashimo, Tomoji Mizuno, Seiya Zhu, Hao Kasparek, Petr Liaw, Lucy Miano, Joseph M. Burgio, Gaetan Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation |
title | Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation |
title_full | Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation |
title_fullStr | Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation |
title_short | Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation |
title_sort | reproducibility of crispr-cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31446895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1776-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gurumurthychannabasavaiahb reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT obrienaidanr reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT quadrosrolenm reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT adamsjohn reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT alcaidepilar reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ayabeshinya reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ballardjohnathan reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT batrasurinderk reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT beauchampmarieclaude reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT beckerkathleena reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT bernasguillaume reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT broughdavid reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT carrillosalinasfrancisco reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT chanwesley reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT chenhanying reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT dawsonruby reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT demambrovictoria reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT dhontjinke reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT dibbkatharinem reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT eudyjamesd reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ganlin reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT gaojing reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT gonzalesamy reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT gunturanyonyar reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT guohuiping reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT harmsdonaldw reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT harringtonanne reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT hentgeskathryne reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT humphreysneil reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT imaishiho reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ishiihideshi reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT iwamamizuho reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT jonascheric reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT karolakmichelle reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT keavneybernard reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT khinnaychi reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT konnomasamitsu reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT kotaniyuko reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT kunihiroyayoi reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT lakshmananimayavaramban reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT larochellecatherine reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT lawrencecatherineb reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT lilin reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT lindnervolkhard reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT liuxiande reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT lopezcastejongloria reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT loudonandrew reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT lowejenna reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT jeromemajewskaloydiea reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT matsusakataiji reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT miurahiromi reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT miyasakayoshiki reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT morpurgobenjamin reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT motylkatherine reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT nabeshimayoichi reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT nakadekoji reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT nakashibatoshiaki reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT nakashimakenichi reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT obatayuichi reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ogiwarasanae reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ouelletmariette reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT oxburghleif reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT piltzsandra reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT pinzilka reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ponnusamymoorthyp reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT raydavid reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT redderronaldj reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT rosencliffordj reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT rossnikki reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ruhemarkt reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ryzhovalarisa reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT salvadoranem reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT alamsabrinashameen reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT sedlacekradislav reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT sharmakaran reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT smithchad reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT staeskatrien reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT starrslora reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT sugiyamafumihiro reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT takahashisatoru reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT tanakatomohiro reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT traffordandreww reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT unoyoshihiro reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT vanhoutteleen reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT vanrockeghemfrederique reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT willisbrandonj reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT wrightchristians reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT yamauchiyuko reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT yixin reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT yoshimikazuto reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT zhangxuesong reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT zhangyu reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ohtsukamasato reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT dassatyabrata reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT garrydanielj reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT hochepiedtino reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT thomaspaul reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT parkerthornburgjan reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT adamsonantonyd reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT yoshikiatsushi reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT schmouthjeanfrancois reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT golovkoandrei reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT thompsonwilliamr reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT lloydkckent reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT woodjoshuaa reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT cowanmitra reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT mashimotomoji reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT mizunoseiya reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT zhuhao reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT kasparekpetr reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT liawlucy reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT mianojosephm reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT burgiogaetan reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation |