Cargando…

Comparison of short-wavelength blue-light autofluorescence and conventional blue-light autofluorescence in geographic atrophy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To systematically compare the intermodality and inter-reader agreement for two blue-light confocal fundus autofluorescence (FAF) systems. METHODS: Thirty eyes (21 patients) with a diagnosis of geographic atrophy (GA) were enrolled. Eyes were imaged using two confocal blue-light FAF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borrelli, Enrico, Nittala, Muneeswar Gupta, Abdelfattah, Nizar Saleh, Lei, Jianqin, Hariri, Amir H, Shi, Yue, Fan, Wenying, Cozzi, Mariano, Sarao, Valentina, Lanzetta, Paolo, Staurenghi, Giovanni, Sadda, SriniVas R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29871967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-311849
_version_ 1783446235850473472
author Borrelli, Enrico
Nittala, Muneeswar Gupta
Abdelfattah, Nizar Saleh
Lei, Jianqin
Hariri, Amir H
Shi, Yue
Fan, Wenying
Cozzi, Mariano
Sarao, Valentina
Lanzetta, Paolo
Staurenghi, Giovanni
Sadda, SriniVas R
author_facet Borrelli, Enrico
Nittala, Muneeswar Gupta
Abdelfattah, Nizar Saleh
Lei, Jianqin
Hariri, Amir H
Shi, Yue
Fan, Wenying
Cozzi, Mariano
Sarao, Valentina
Lanzetta, Paolo
Staurenghi, Giovanni
Sadda, SriniVas R
author_sort Borrelli, Enrico
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: To systematically compare the intermodality and inter-reader agreement for two blue-light confocal fundus autofluorescence (FAF) systems. METHODS: Thirty eyes (21 patients) with a diagnosis of geographic atrophy (GA) were enrolled. Eyes were imaged using two confocal blue-light FAF devices: (1) Spectralis device with a 488 nm excitation wavelength (488-FAF); (2) EIDON device with 450 nm excitation wavelength and the capability for ‘colour’ FAF imaging including both the individual red and green components of the emission spectrum. Furthermore, a third imaging modality (450-RF image) isolating and highlighting the red emission fluorescence component (REFC) was obtained and graded. Each image was graded by two readers to assess inter-reader variability and a single image for each modality was used to assess the intermodality variability. RESULTS: The 95% coefficient of repeatability (1.35 mm(2) for the 488-FAF-based grading, 8.13 mm(2) for the 450-FAF-based grading and 1.08 mm(2) for the 450-RF-based grading), the coefficient of variation (1.11 for 488-FAF, 2.05 for 450-FAF, 0.92 for 450-RF) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (0.994 for 488-FAF, 0.711 for 450-FAF, 0.997 for 450-RF) indicated that 450-FAF-based and 450-RF-based grading have the lowest and highest inter-reader agreements, respectively. The GA area was larger for 488-FAF images (median (IQR) 2.1 mm(2) (0.8–6.4 mm(2))) than for 450-FAF images (median (IQR) 1.0 mm(2) (0.3–4.3 mm(2)); p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in lesion area measurement between 488-FAF-based and 450-RF-based grading (median (IQR) 2.6 mm(2) (0.8–6.8 mm(2)); p=1.0). CONCLUSION: The isolation of the REFC from the 450-FAF images allowed for a reproducible quantification of GA. This assessment had good comparability with that obtained with 488-FAF images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6709768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67097682019-09-09 Comparison of short-wavelength blue-light autofluorescence and conventional blue-light autofluorescence in geographic atrophy Borrelli, Enrico Nittala, Muneeswar Gupta Abdelfattah, Nizar Saleh Lei, Jianqin Hariri, Amir H Shi, Yue Fan, Wenying Cozzi, Mariano Sarao, Valentina Lanzetta, Paolo Staurenghi, Giovanni Sadda, SriniVas R Br J Ophthalmol Clinical Science BACKGROUND/AIMS: To systematically compare the intermodality and inter-reader agreement for two blue-light confocal fundus autofluorescence (FAF) systems. METHODS: Thirty eyes (21 patients) with a diagnosis of geographic atrophy (GA) were enrolled. Eyes were imaged using two confocal blue-light FAF devices: (1) Spectralis device with a 488 nm excitation wavelength (488-FAF); (2) EIDON device with 450 nm excitation wavelength and the capability for ‘colour’ FAF imaging including both the individual red and green components of the emission spectrum. Furthermore, a third imaging modality (450-RF image) isolating and highlighting the red emission fluorescence component (REFC) was obtained and graded. Each image was graded by two readers to assess inter-reader variability and a single image for each modality was used to assess the intermodality variability. RESULTS: The 95% coefficient of repeatability (1.35 mm(2) for the 488-FAF-based grading, 8.13 mm(2) for the 450-FAF-based grading and 1.08 mm(2) for the 450-RF-based grading), the coefficient of variation (1.11 for 488-FAF, 2.05 for 450-FAF, 0.92 for 450-RF) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (0.994 for 488-FAF, 0.711 for 450-FAF, 0.997 for 450-RF) indicated that 450-FAF-based and 450-RF-based grading have the lowest and highest inter-reader agreements, respectively. The GA area was larger for 488-FAF images (median (IQR) 2.1 mm(2) (0.8–6.4 mm(2))) than for 450-FAF images (median (IQR) 1.0 mm(2) (0.3–4.3 mm(2)); p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in lesion area measurement between 488-FAF-based and 450-RF-based grading (median (IQR) 2.6 mm(2) (0.8–6.8 mm(2)); p=1.0). CONCLUSION: The isolation of the REFC from the 450-FAF images allowed for a reproducible quantification of GA. This assessment had good comparability with that obtained with 488-FAF images. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05 2018-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6709768/ /pubmed/29871967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-311849 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Borrelli, Enrico
Nittala, Muneeswar Gupta
Abdelfattah, Nizar Saleh
Lei, Jianqin
Hariri, Amir H
Shi, Yue
Fan, Wenying
Cozzi, Mariano
Sarao, Valentina
Lanzetta, Paolo
Staurenghi, Giovanni
Sadda, SriniVas R
Comparison of short-wavelength blue-light autofluorescence and conventional blue-light autofluorescence in geographic atrophy
title Comparison of short-wavelength blue-light autofluorescence and conventional blue-light autofluorescence in geographic atrophy
title_full Comparison of short-wavelength blue-light autofluorescence and conventional blue-light autofluorescence in geographic atrophy
title_fullStr Comparison of short-wavelength blue-light autofluorescence and conventional blue-light autofluorescence in geographic atrophy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of short-wavelength blue-light autofluorescence and conventional blue-light autofluorescence in geographic atrophy
title_short Comparison of short-wavelength blue-light autofluorescence and conventional blue-light autofluorescence in geographic atrophy
title_sort comparison of short-wavelength blue-light autofluorescence and conventional blue-light autofluorescence in geographic atrophy
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29871967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-311849
work_keys_str_mv AT borrellienrico comparisonofshortwavelengthbluelightautofluorescenceandconventionalbluelightautofluorescenceingeographicatrophy
AT nittalamuneeswargupta comparisonofshortwavelengthbluelightautofluorescenceandconventionalbluelightautofluorescenceingeographicatrophy
AT abdelfattahnizarsaleh comparisonofshortwavelengthbluelightautofluorescenceandconventionalbluelightautofluorescenceingeographicatrophy
AT leijianqin comparisonofshortwavelengthbluelightautofluorescenceandconventionalbluelightautofluorescenceingeographicatrophy
AT haririamirh comparisonofshortwavelengthbluelightautofluorescenceandconventionalbluelightautofluorescenceingeographicatrophy
AT shiyue comparisonofshortwavelengthbluelightautofluorescenceandconventionalbluelightautofluorescenceingeographicatrophy
AT fanwenying comparisonofshortwavelengthbluelightautofluorescenceandconventionalbluelightautofluorescenceingeographicatrophy
AT cozzimariano comparisonofshortwavelengthbluelightautofluorescenceandconventionalbluelightautofluorescenceingeographicatrophy
AT saraovalentina comparisonofshortwavelengthbluelightautofluorescenceandconventionalbluelightautofluorescenceingeographicatrophy
AT lanzettapaolo comparisonofshortwavelengthbluelightautofluorescenceandconventionalbluelightautofluorescenceingeographicatrophy
AT staurenghigiovanni comparisonofshortwavelengthbluelightautofluorescenceandconventionalbluelightautofluorescenceingeographicatrophy
AT saddasrinivasr comparisonofshortwavelengthbluelightautofluorescenceandconventionalbluelightautofluorescenceingeographicatrophy