Cargando…

No evidence for higher rates of hepatocellular carcinoma after direct-acting antiviral treatment: a meta-analysis

AIM: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the United States. Achieving sustained viral response with interferon (IFN) treatment reduces the risk from 3%-5% to 0.5%-1% annually. Several studies reported unexpectedly high rates of HCC after treatment with d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rutledge, Stephanie M., Zheng, Hui, Li, Darrick K., Chung, Raymond T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31453368
http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2019.19
_version_ 1783446254365179904
author Rutledge, Stephanie M.
Zheng, Hui
Li, Darrick K.
Chung, Raymond T.
author_facet Rutledge, Stephanie M.
Zheng, Hui
Li, Darrick K.
Chung, Raymond T.
author_sort Rutledge, Stephanie M.
collection PubMed
description AIM: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the United States. Achieving sustained viral response with interferon (IFN) treatment reduces the risk from 3%-5% to 0.5%-1% annually. Several studies reported unexpectedly high rates of HCC after treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). The aim of our study was to compare HCC rates in DAA-, IFN-treated and untreated populations. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using ScienceDirect, Ovid®, Web of Science and MEDLINE through January 2019. Studies were included if they measured rates of de novo or recurrent HCC (following curative treatment) in HCV-infected persons. We included 138 studies (n = 177,512). Simple pooling of data and meta-analysis were performed, using the random effects method. RESULTS: Mean age was higher in the DAA-treated vs. IFN-treated group (58.4 years vs. 52.6 years; P = 0.0073), as were diabetes prevalence (34.5% vs. 11.7%; P ≤ 0.001) and incident cirrhosis (47.8% vs. 34.2%, P = 0.0017). The incidence rate of de novo HCC was 2.01/100 person-years (py) (95%CI: 1.38, 2.67) in the DAA group and 1.45/100py (95%CI: 0.98, 1.94) in the IFN-treated group. HCC recurred at 16.76/100py (95%CI: 10.75, 22.91) in the DAA-treated group vs. 20.04/100py (95%CI: 2.58, 45.21) after IFN. After adjusting for factors such as age and cirrhosis, the hazard ratio was 0.58 (95%CI: 0.20, 1.07) for HCC occurrence and 0.59 (95%CI: 0.24, 1.03) for HCC recurrence after DAA treatment compared to IFN-based treatment. CONCLUSION: We did not find evidence for increased rates of HCC in DAA-treated compared with IFN-treated patients. Compared to those treated with IFN, older patients with additional risk factors for HCC were treated with DAAs. This imbalance appears to explain the higher numerical incidence of HCC among DAA-treated patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6709867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67098672019-08-26 No evidence for higher rates of hepatocellular carcinoma after direct-acting antiviral treatment: a meta-analysis Rutledge, Stephanie M. Zheng, Hui Li, Darrick K. Chung, Raymond T. Hepatoma Res Article AIM: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the United States. Achieving sustained viral response with interferon (IFN) treatment reduces the risk from 3%-5% to 0.5%-1% annually. Several studies reported unexpectedly high rates of HCC after treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). The aim of our study was to compare HCC rates in DAA-, IFN-treated and untreated populations. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using ScienceDirect, Ovid®, Web of Science and MEDLINE through January 2019. Studies were included if they measured rates of de novo or recurrent HCC (following curative treatment) in HCV-infected persons. We included 138 studies (n = 177,512). Simple pooling of data and meta-analysis were performed, using the random effects method. RESULTS: Mean age was higher in the DAA-treated vs. IFN-treated group (58.4 years vs. 52.6 years; P = 0.0073), as were diabetes prevalence (34.5% vs. 11.7%; P ≤ 0.001) and incident cirrhosis (47.8% vs. 34.2%, P = 0.0017). The incidence rate of de novo HCC was 2.01/100 person-years (py) (95%CI: 1.38, 2.67) in the DAA group and 1.45/100py (95%CI: 0.98, 1.94) in the IFN-treated group. HCC recurred at 16.76/100py (95%CI: 10.75, 22.91) in the DAA-treated group vs. 20.04/100py (95%CI: 2.58, 45.21) after IFN. After adjusting for factors such as age and cirrhosis, the hazard ratio was 0.58 (95%CI: 0.20, 1.07) for HCC occurrence and 0.59 (95%CI: 0.24, 1.03) for HCC recurrence after DAA treatment compared to IFN-based treatment. CONCLUSION: We did not find evidence for increased rates of HCC in DAA-treated compared with IFN-treated patients. Compared to those treated with IFN, older patients with additional risk factors for HCC were treated with DAAs. This imbalance appears to explain the higher numerical incidence of HCC among DAA-treated patients. 2019-08-07 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6709867/ /pubmed/31453368 http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2019.19 Text en Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Rutledge, Stephanie M.
Zheng, Hui
Li, Darrick K.
Chung, Raymond T.
No evidence for higher rates of hepatocellular carcinoma after direct-acting antiviral treatment: a meta-analysis
title No evidence for higher rates of hepatocellular carcinoma after direct-acting antiviral treatment: a meta-analysis
title_full No evidence for higher rates of hepatocellular carcinoma after direct-acting antiviral treatment: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr No evidence for higher rates of hepatocellular carcinoma after direct-acting antiviral treatment: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed No evidence for higher rates of hepatocellular carcinoma after direct-acting antiviral treatment: a meta-analysis
title_short No evidence for higher rates of hepatocellular carcinoma after direct-acting antiviral treatment: a meta-analysis
title_sort no evidence for higher rates of hepatocellular carcinoma after direct-acting antiviral treatment: a meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31453368
http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2019.19
work_keys_str_mv AT rutledgestephaniem noevidenceforhigherratesofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterdirectactingantiviraltreatmentametaanalysis
AT zhenghui noevidenceforhigherratesofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterdirectactingantiviraltreatmentametaanalysis
AT lidarrickk noevidenceforhigherratesofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterdirectactingantiviraltreatmentametaanalysis
AT chungraymondt noevidenceforhigherratesofhepatocellularcarcinomaafterdirectactingantiviraltreatmentametaanalysis