Cargando…

Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity

OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) between sessions and raters in the adult spinal deformity (ASD) population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Up to now evaluation in ASD was mainly based on static radiographic p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Severijns, Pieter, Overbergh, Thomas, Scheys, Lennart, Moke, Lieven, Desloovere, Kaat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31449540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221489
_version_ 1783446263543365632
author Severijns, Pieter
Overbergh, Thomas
Scheys, Lennart
Moke, Lieven
Desloovere, Kaat
author_facet Severijns, Pieter
Overbergh, Thomas
Scheys, Lennart
Moke, Lieven
Desloovere, Kaat
author_sort Severijns, Pieter
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) between sessions and raters in the adult spinal deformity (ASD) population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Up to now evaluation in ASD was mainly based on static radiographic parameters. Recently literature showed that dynamic balance was a better predictor of health-related quality of life than radiographic parameters, stressing the importance of balance assessment. However, to the best of our knowledge, reliability of balance assessment tools has not yet been investigated in the ASD population. METHODS: Twenty ASD patients participated in this study. Ten patients were included in the test-retest study, including repeated measurements. Ten patients were measured once, simultaneously but independently by three raters. Each participant performed two balance scales, namely the BESTest and the TCMS. Statistical analysis consisted of intra class correlations (ICC) on scale- and subscale level, and kappa scores on item-level. Cronbach’s alpha on total scores, standard errors of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable differences and percentages of agreement were also calculated. Bland-altman plots were created to investigate systematic bias. RESULTS: ICC scores between sessions and raters for TCMS (0.76 and 0.88) and BESTest (0.90 and 0.94) total scores were good to excellent. SEM’s between sessions and raters were also low for total scores on TCMS (1.66 and 2.35) and BESTest (2.99 and 2.32). However, on subscale- and item-level reliability decreased and ceiling effects were observed. No systematic bias was observed between sessions and raters. CONCLUSION: BESTest and TCMS showed to be reliable tools to measure balance in ASD on scale-level. However, on subscale- and item-level reliability decreased and ceiling effects were observed. Therefore, the question arises if there is need for an ASD-specific balance scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6709918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67099182019-09-10 Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity Severijns, Pieter Overbergh, Thomas Scheys, Lennart Moke, Lieven Desloovere, Kaat PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) between sessions and raters in the adult spinal deformity (ASD) population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Up to now evaluation in ASD was mainly based on static radiographic parameters. Recently literature showed that dynamic balance was a better predictor of health-related quality of life than radiographic parameters, stressing the importance of balance assessment. However, to the best of our knowledge, reliability of balance assessment tools has not yet been investigated in the ASD population. METHODS: Twenty ASD patients participated in this study. Ten patients were included in the test-retest study, including repeated measurements. Ten patients were measured once, simultaneously but independently by three raters. Each participant performed two balance scales, namely the BESTest and the TCMS. Statistical analysis consisted of intra class correlations (ICC) on scale- and subscale level, and kappa scores on item-level. Cronbach’s alpha on total scores, standard errors of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable differences and percentages of agreement were also calculated. Bland-altman plots were created to investigate systematic bias. RESULTS: ICC scores between sessions and raters for TCMS (0.76 and 0.88) and BESTest (0.90 and 0.94) total scores were good to excellent. SEM’s between sessions and raters were also low for total scores on TCMS (1.66 and 2.35) and BESTest (2.99 and 2.32). However, on subscale- and item-level reliability decreased and ceiling effects were observed. No systematic bias was observed between sessions and raters. CONCLUSION: BESTest and TCMS showed to be reliable tools to measure balance in ASD on scale-level. However, on subscale- and item-level reliability decreased and ceiling effects were observed. Therefore, the question arises if there is need for an ASD-specific balance scale. Public Library of Science 2019-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6709918/ /pubmed/31449540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221489 Text en © 2019 Severijns et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Severijns, Pieter
Overbergh, Thomas
Scheys, Lennart
Moke, Lieven
Desloovere, Kaat
Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity
title Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity
title_full Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity
title_fullStr Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity
title_short Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity
title_sort reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31449540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221489
work_keys_str_mv AT severijnspieter reliabilityofthebalanceevaluationsystemstestandtrunkcontrolmeasurementscaleinadultspinaldeformity
AT overberghthomas reliabilityofthebalanceevaluationsystemstestandtrunkcontrolmeasurementscaleinadultspinaldeformity
AT scheyslennart reliabilityofthebalanceevaluationsystemstestandtrunkcontrolmeasurementscaleinadultspinaldeformity
AT mokelieven reliabilityofthebalanceevaluationsystemstestandtrunkcontrolmeasurementscaleinadultspinaldeformity
AT deslooverekaat reliabilityofthebalanceevaluationsystemstestandtrunkcontrolmeasurementscaleinadultspinaldeformity