Cargando…
Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity
OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) between sessions and raters in the adult spinal deformity (ASD) population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Up to now evaluation in ASD was mainly based on static radiographic p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31449540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221489 |
_version_ | 1783446263543365632 |
---|---|
author | Severijns, Pieter Overbergh, Thomas Scheys, Lennart Moke, Lieven Desloovere, Kaat |
author_facet | Severijns, Pieter Overbergh, Thomas Scheys, Lennart Moke, Lieven Desloovere, Kaat |
author_sort | Severijns, Pieter |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) between sessions and raters in the adult spinal deformity (ASD) population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Up to now evaluation in ASD was mainly based on static radiographic parameters. Recently literature showed that dynamic balance was a better predictor of health-related quality of life than radiographic parameters, stressing the importance of balance assessment. However, to the best of our knowledge, reliability of balance assessment tools has not yet been investigated in the ASD population. METHODS: Twenty ASD patients participated in this study. Ten patients were included in the test-retest study, including repeated measurements. Ten patients were measured once, simultaneously but independently by three raters. Each participant performed two balance scales, namely the BESTest and the TCMS. Statistical analysis consisted of intra class correlations (ICC) on scale- and subscale level, and kappa scores on item-level. Cronbach’s alpha on total scores, standard errors of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable differences and percentages of agreement were also calculated. Bland-altman plots were created to investigate systematic bias. RESULTS: ICC scores between sessions and raters for TCMS (0.76 and 0.88) and BESTest (0.90 and 0.94) total scores were good to excellent. SEM’s between sessions and raters were also low for total scores on TCMS (1.66 and 2.35) and BESTest (2.99 and 2.32). However, on subscale- and item-level reliability decreased and ceiling effects were observed. No systematic bias was observed between sessions and raters. CONCLUSION: BESTest and TCMS showed to be reliable tools to measure balance in ASD on scale-level. However, on subscale- and item-level reliability decreased and ceiling effects were observed. Therefore, the question arises if there is need for an ASD-specific balance scale. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6709918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67099182019-09-10 Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity Severijns, Pieter Overbergh, Thomas Scheys, Lennart Moke, Lieven Desloovere, Kaat PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) between sessions and raters in the adult spinal deformity (ASD) population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Up to now evaluation in ASD was mainly based on static radiographic parameters. Recently literature showed that dynamic balance was a better predictor of health-related quality of life than radiographic parameters, stressing the importance of balance assessment. However, to the best of our knowledge, reliability of balance assessment tools has not yet been investigated in the ASD population. METHODS: Twenty ASD patients participated in this study. Ten patients were included in the test-retest study, including repeated measurements. Ten patients were measured once, simultaneously but independently by three raters. Each participant performed two balance scales, namely the BESTest and the TCMS. Statistical analysis consisted of intra class correlations (ICC) on scale- and subscale level, and kappa scores on item-level. Cronbach’s alpha on total scores, standard errors of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable differences and percentages of agreement were also calculated. Bland-altman plots were created to investigate systematic bias. RESULTS: ICC scores between sessions and raters for TCMS (0.76 and 0.88) and BESTest (0.90 and 0.94) total scores were good to excellent. SEM’s between sessions and raters were also low for total scores on TCMS (1.66 and 2.35) and BESTest (2.99 and 2.32). However, on subscale- and item-level reliability decreased and ceiling effects were observed. No systematic bias was observed between sessions and raters. CONCLUSION: BESTest and TCMS showed to be reliable tools to measure balance in ASD on scale-level. However, on subscale- and item-level reliability decreased and ceiling effects were observed. Therefore, the question arises if there is need for an ASD-specific balance scale. Public Library of Science 2019-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6709918/ /pubmed/31449540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221489 Text en © 2019 Severijns et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Severijns, Pieter Overbergh, Thomas Scheys, Lennart Moke, Lieven Desloovere, Kaat Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity |
title | Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity |
title_full | Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity |
title_fullStr | Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity |
title_short | Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity |
title_sort | reliability of the balance evaluation systems test and trunk control measurement scale in adult spinal deformity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6709918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31449540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221489 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT severijnspieter reliabilityofthebalanceevaluationsystemstestandtrunkcontrolmeasurementscaleinadultspinaldeformity AT overberghthomas reliabilityofthebalanceevaluationsystemstestandtrunkcontrolmeasurementscaleinadultspinaldeformity AT scheyslennart reliabilityofthebalanceevaluationsystemstestandtrunkcontrolmeasurementscaleinadultspinaldeformity AT mokelieven reliabilityofthebalanceevaluationsystemstestandtrunkcontrolmeasurementscaleinadultspinaldeformity AT deslooverekaat reliabilityofthebalanceevaluationsystemstestandtrunkcontrolmeasurementscaleinadultspinaldeformity |