Cargando…
Assessing the practical differences between model selection methods in inferences about choice response time tasks
Evidence accumulations models (EAMs) have become the dominant modeling framework within rapid decision-making, using choice response time distributions to make inferences about the underlying decision process. These models are often applied to empirical data as “measurement tools”, with different th...
Autor principal: | Evans, Nathan J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30783896 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-01563-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Quality of Response Time Data Inference: A Blinded, Collaborative Assessment of the Validity of Cognitive Models
por: Dutilh, Gilles, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Age-related slowing of response selection and production in a visual choice reaction time task
por: Woods, David L., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Methods to split cognitive task data for estimating split-half reliability: A comprehensive review and systematic assessment
por: Pronk, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Corrigendum: Age-related slowing of response selection and production in a visual choice reaction time task
por: Woods, David L., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Age differences in sustained attention tasks: A meta-analysis
por: Vallesi, Antonino, et al.
Publicado: (2021)