Cargando…
Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, referred to as “Regimen”, as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced melanoma from the perspective of Canada’s public healthcare system. METHODS: We developed a partitioned-survi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30617952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-018-0112-1 |
_version_ | 1783446359614947328 |
---|---|
author | Quon, Peter L. Xiao, Ying Sorensen, Sonja Monfared, Amir Abbas Tahami |
author_facet | Quon, Peter L. Xiao, Ying Sorensen, Sonja Monfared, Amir Abbas Tahami |
author_sort | Quon, Peter L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, referred to as “Regimen”, as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced melanoma from the perspective of Canada’s public healthcare system. METHODS: We developed a partitioned-survival model (progression-free survival, post-progression survival, and death) to determine the clinical and economic outcomes of immunotherapy for advanced melanoma over a 20-year time horizon. Regimen was compared with nivolumab, ipilimumab, and pembrolizumab. Two treatment durations for pembrolizumab were considered: (1) maximum of 24 months or until progression or (2) no maximum duration, until progression. The model used data from CheckMate-067 (28 months’ follow-up) for treatments involving nivolumab and ipilimumab. The efficacy of pembrolizumab was estimated using indirect comparisons. A scenario looking at the cost of subsequent treatments following disease progression was examined. RESULTS: Regimen had better outcomes and was cost effective compared with all other immunotherapies at a threshold of $CAN100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Compared with nivolumab and ipilimumab, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were $CAN47,119 and 66,750 per QALY, respectively. Compared with pembrolizumab with a treatment duration cap, the ICER was $CAN85,436. When assuming no duration cap, Regimen dominated pembrolizumab. With the inclusion of subsequent treatment costs following progression, Regimen’s ICER improved compared with all other comparators. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advent of effective new therapies for advanced melanoma, prognosis remains poor for some patients. Compared with other immunotherapies, Regimen offers marked benefit and may be a cost-effective treatment option. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-018-0112-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6710483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67104832019-09-09 Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada Quon, Peter L. Xiao, Ying Sorensen, Sonja Monfared, Amir Abbas Tahami Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, referred to as “Regimen”, as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced melanoma from the perspective of Canada’s public healthcare system. METHODS: We developed a partitioned-survival model (progression-free survival, post-progression survival, and death) to determine the clinical and economic outcomes of immunotherapy for advanced melanoma over a 20-year time horizon. Regimen was compared with nivolumab, ipilimumab, and pembrolizumab. Two treatment durations for pembrolizumab were considered: (1) maximum of 24 months or until progression or (2) no maximum duration, until progression. The model used data from CheckMate-067 (28 months’ follow-up) for treatments involving nivolumab and ipilimumab. The efficacy of pembrolizumab was estimated using indirect comparisons. A scenario looking at the cost of subsequent treatments following disease progression was examined. RESULTS: Regimen had better outcomes and was cost effective compared with all other immunotherapies at a threshold of $CAN100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Compared with nivolumab and ipilimumab, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were $CAN47,119 and 66,750 per QALY, respectively. Compared with pembrolizumab with a treatment duration cap, the ICER was $CAN85,436. When assuming no duration cap, Regimen dominated pembrolizumab. With the inclusion of subsequent treatment costs following progression, Regimen’s ICER improved compared with all other comparators. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advent of effective new therapies for advanced melanoma, prognosis remains poor for some patients. Compared with other immunotherapies, Regimen offers marked benefit and may be a cost-effective treatment option. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-018-0112-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6710483/ /pubmed/30617952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-018-0112-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Quon, Peter L. Xiao, Ying Sorensen, Sonja Monfared, Amir Abbas Tahami Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada |
title | Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada |
title_full | Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada |
title_fullStr | Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada |
title_full_unstemmed | Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada |
title_short | Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada |
title_sort | economic evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination as first-line treatment for patients with advanced melanoma in canada |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30617952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-018-0112-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quonpeterl economicevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabcombinationasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithadvancedmelanomaincanada AT xiaoying economicevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabcombinationasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithadvancedmelanomaincanada AT sorensensonja economicevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabcombinationasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithadvancedmelanomaincanada AT monfaredamirabbastahami economicevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabcombinationasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithadvancedmelanomaincanada |