Cargando…

Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, referred to as “Regimen”, as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced melanoma from the perspective of Canada’s public healthcare system. METHODS: We developed a partitioned-survi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quon, Peter L., Xiao, Ying, Sorensen, Sonja, Monfared, Amir Abbas Tahami
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30617952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-018-0112-1
_version_ 1783446359614947328
author Quon, Peter L.
Xiao, Ying
Sorensen, Sonja
Monfared, Amir Abbas Tahami
author_facet Quon, Peter L.
Xiao, Ying
Sorensen, Sonja
Monfared, Amir Abbas Tahami
author_sort Quon, Peter L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, referred to as “Regimen”, as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced melanoma from the perspective of Canada’s public healthcare system. METHODS: We developed a partitioned-survival model (progression-free survival, post-progression survival, and death) to determine the clinical and economic outcomes of immunotherapy for advanced melanoma over a 20-year time horizon. Regimen was compared with nivolumab, ipilimumab, and pembrolizumab. Two treatment durations for pembrolizumab were considered: (1) maximum of 24 months or until progression or (2) no maximum duration, until progression. The model used data from CheckMate-067 (28 months’ follow-up) for treatments involving nivolumab and ipilimumab. The efficacy of pembrolizumab was estimated using indirect comparisons. A scenario looking at the cost of subsequent treatments following disease progression was examined. RESULTS: Regimen had better outcomes and was cost effective compared with all other immunotherapies at a threshold of $CAN100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Compared with nivolumab and ipilimumab, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were $CAN47,119 and 66,750 per QALY, respectively. Compared with pembrolizumab with a treatment duration cap, the ICER was $CAN85,436. When assuming no duration cap, Regimen dominated pembrolizumab. With the inclusion of subsequent treatment costs following progression, Regimen’s ICER improved compared with all other comparators. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advent of effective new therapies for advanced melanoma, prognosis remains poor for some patients. Compared with other immunotherapies, Regimen offers marked benefit and may be a cost-effective treatment option. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-018-0112-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6710483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67104832019-09-09 Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada Quon, Peter L. Xiao, Ying Sorensen, Sonja Monfared, Amir Abbas Tahami Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, referred to as “Regimen”, as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced melanoma from the perspective of Canada’s public healthcare system. METHODS: We developed a partitioned-survival model (progression-free survival, post-progression survival, and death) to determine the clinical and economic outcomes of immunotherapy for advanced melanoma over a 20-year time horizon. Regimen was compared with nivolumab, ipilimumab, and pembrolizumab. Two treatment durations for pembrolizumab were considered: (1) maximum of 24 months or until progression or (2) no maximum duration, until progression. The model used data from CheckMate-067 (28 months’ follow-up) for treatments involving nivolumab and ipilimumab. The efficacy of pembrolizumab was estimated using indirect comparisons. A scenario looking at the cost of subsequent treatments following disease progression was examined. RESULTS: Regimen had better outcomes and was cost effective compared with all other immunotherapies at a threshold of $CAN100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Compared with nivolumab and ipilimumab, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were $CAN47,119 and 66,750 per QALY, respectively. Compared with pembrolizumab with a treatment duration cap, the ICER was $CAN85,436. When assuming no duration cap, Regimen dominated pembrolizumab. With the inclusion of subsequent treatment costs following progression, Regimen’s ICER improved compared with all other comparators. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advent of effective new therapies for advanced melanoma, prognosis remains poor for some patients. Compared with other immunotherapies, Regimen offers marked benefit and may be a cost-effective treatment option. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-018-0112-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6710483/ /pubmed/30617952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-018-0112-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Quon, Peter L.
Xiao, Ying
Sorensen, Sonja
Monfared, Amir Abbas Tahami
Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada
title Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada
title_full Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada
title_fullStr Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada
title_full_unstemmed Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada
title_short Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada
title_sort economic evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination as first-line treatment for patients with advanced melanoma in canada
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30617952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-018-0112-1
work_keys_str_mv AT quonpeterl economicevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabcombinationasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithadvancedmelanomaincanada
AT xiaoying economicevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabcombinationasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithadvancedmelanomaincanada
AT sorensensonja economicevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabcombinationasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithadvancedmelanomaincanada
AT monfaredamirabbastahami economicevaluationofnivolumabplusipilimumabcombinationasfirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithadvancedmelanomaincanada