Cargando…

Effects of CYP3A inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of quizartinib, a potent and selective FLT3 inhibitor, and its active metabolite

AIMS: Quizartinib is an oral, highly potent and selective next‐generation FMS‐like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor under investigation in patients with FLT3‐internal tandem duplication‐mutated acute myeloid leukaemia. This drug–drug interaction study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of quizarti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jianke, Kankam, Martin, Trone, Denise, Gammon, Guy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31173645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14022
_version_ 1783446364576808960
author Li, Jianke
Kankam, Martin
Trone, Denise
Gammon, Guy
author_facet Li, Jianke
Kankam, Martin
Trone, Denise
Gammon, Guy
author_sort Li, Jianke
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Quizartinib is an oral, highly potent and selective next‐generation FMS‐like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor under investigation in patients with FLT3‐internal tandem duplication‐mutated acute myeloid leukaemia. This drug–drug interaction study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of quizartinib when coadministered with strong or moderate cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibitors. METHODS: In this parallel‐group study, subjects were randomised to receive: (i) quizartinib + ketoconazole; (ii) quizartinib + fluconazole; or (iii) quizartinib alone. On Days 1–28, subjects received ketoconazole 200 mg or fluconazole 200 mg twice daily, and on Day 8, all subjects received a single 30‐mg quizartinib dose. Blood samples were collected for PK analyses, steady‐state PK parameters were simulated by superpositioning, and safety was assessed. RESULTS: Ninety‐three healthy subjects were randomised; 86 completed the study. When administered with ketoconazole, geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for quizartinib maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were 117% (105%, 130%) and 194% (169%, 223%), respectively, vs quizartinib alone. Steady‐state PK simulation demonstrated ~2‐fold increase of both steady–state C(max) and AUC from time 0 to the end of the dosing interval when quizartinib was administered with ketoconazole due to accumulation of quizartinib at steady state. When administered with fluconazole, geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for quizartinib C(max) and AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were 111% (100%, 124%) and 120% (104%, 138%), respectively, vs quizartinib alone. Overall, 5.4% of subjects experienced quizartinib‐related adverse events; no serious adverse events or deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest reducing the dose of quizartinib when coadministered with a strong CYP3A inhibitor, but not with a moderate or weak CYP3A inhibitor. This dose reduction was implemented in phase 3 evaluation of quizartinib.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6710528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67105282019-08-28 Effects of CYP3A inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of quizartinib, a potent and selective FLT3 inhibitor, and its active metabolite Li, Jianke Kankam, Martin Trone, Denise Gammon, Guy Br J Clin Pharmacol Original Articles AIMS: Quizartinib is an oral, highly potent and selective next‐generation FMS‐like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor under investigation in patients with FLT3‐internal tandem duplication‐mutated acute myeloid leukaemia. This drug–drug interaction study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of quizartinib when coadministered with strong or moderate cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibitors. METHODS: In this parallel‐group study, subjects were randomised to receive: (i) quizartinib + ketoconazole; (ii) quizartinib + fluconazole; or (iii) quizartinib alone. On Days 1–28, subjects received ketoconazole 200 mg or fluconazole 200 mg twice daily, and on Day 8, all subjects received a single 30‐mg quizartinib dose. Blood samples were collected for PK analyses, steady‐state PK parameters were simulated by superpositioning, and safety was assessed. RESULTS: Ninety‐three healthy subjects were randomised; 86 completed the study. When administered with ketoconazole, geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for quizartinib maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were 117% (105%, 130%) and 194% (169%, 223%), respectively, vs quizartinib alone. Steady‐state PK simulation demonstrated ~2‐fold increase of both steady–state C(max) and AUC from time 0 to the end of the dosing interval when quizartinib was administered with ketoconazole due to accumulation of quizartinib at steady state. When administered with fluconazole, geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for quizartinib C(max) and AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were 111% (100%, 124%) and 120% (104%, 138%), respectively, vs quizartinib alone. Overall, 5.4% of subjects experienced quizartinib‐related adverse events; no serious adverse events or deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest reducing the dose of quizartinib when coadministered with a strong CYP3A inhibitor, but not with a moderate or weak CYP3A inhibitor. This dose reduction was implemented in phase 3 evaluation of quizartinib. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-23 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6710528/ /pubmed/31173645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14022 Text en © 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Li, Jianke
Kankam, Martin
Trone, Denise
Gammon, Guy
Effects of CYP3A inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of quizartinib, a potent and selective FLT3 inhibitor, and its active metabolite
title Effects of CYP3A inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of quizartinib, a potent and selective FLT3 inhibitor, and its active metabolite
title_full Effects of CYP3A inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of quizartinib, a potent and selective FLT3 inhibitor, and its active metabolite
title_fullStr Effects of CYP3A inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of quizartinib, a potent and selective FLT3 inhibitor, and its active metabolite
title_full_unstemmed Effects of CYP3A inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of quizartinib, a potent and selective FLT3 inhibitor, and its active metabolite
title_short Effects of CYP3A inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of quizartinib, a potent and selective FLT3 inhibitor, and its active metabolite
title_sort effects of cyp3a inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of quizartinib, a potent and selective flt3 inhibitor, and its active metabolite
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31173645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14022
work_keys_str_mv AT lijianke effectsofcyp3ainhibitorsonthepharmacokineticsofquizartinibapotentandselectiveflt3inhibitoranditsactivemetabolite
AT kankammartin effectsofcyp3ainhibitorsonthepharmacokineticsofquizartinibapotentandselectiveflt3inhibitoranditsactivemetabolite
AT tronedenise effectsofcyp3ainhibitorsonthepharmacokineticsofquizartinibapotentandselectiveflt3inhibitoranditsactivemetabolite
AT gammonguy effectsofcyp3ainhibitorsonthepharmacokineticsofquizartinibapotentandselectiveflt3inhibitoranditsactivemetabolite