Cargando…
Patients, health professionals, and the health system: influencers on patients’ participation in ward rounds
BACKGROUND: The ward round is an opportunity to plan and deliver patient-centered care. Benefits include an effective and safer clinician-patient relationship, patient empowerment, reduced anxiety and increased trust in the health care system. Factors contributing to patient involvement in ward roun...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31692552 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S211073 |
_version_ | 1783446368049692672 |
---|---|
author | Walton, Victoria Hogden, Anne Long, Janet C Johnson, Julie K Greenfield, David |
author_facet | Walton, Victoria Hogden, Anne Long, Janet C Johnson, Julie K Greenfield, David |
author_sort | Walton, Victoria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The ward round is an opportunity to plan and deliver patient-centered care. Benefits include an effective and safer clinician-patient relationship, patient empowerment, reduced anxiety and increased trust in the health care system. Factors contributing to patient involvement in ward rounds is shaped by their preferences, ability, and opportunity. AIM: To investigate ward rounds and the patient experience with them, the relationship between the patient and clinicians, and how rounds facilitate collaboration between them. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multimethod study was conducted in a single Australian facility in acute medicine and rehabilitation specialties. An observational study of ward rounds in each setting was conducted with 14 patients, aged between 55 and 89 years followed by semi-structured interviews conducted with the patients observed. Descriptive and thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: One third of participants had not heard of the term ward round or could describe their purpose. Three main influencers on the patient experience of rounds were: self; the health system; and medical officers. No meaningful difference was found between patients in acute medicine and rehabilitation although all wanted to receive information from the senior medical officers. Patients more familiar with the health system were more active participants and took greater responsibility for their involvement in rounds and described higher satisfaction. CONCLUSION: There is a level of acceptance within the health system that patients understand what a ward round is. However, their role on the round is complex and this may only be developed through experiencing them. High system users teach themselves to navigate rounding processes to ensure their needs are met. To ensure equity in participation patients should be educated on ward rounds, what to expect and how to they can participate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6710545 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67105452019-11-05 Patients, health professionals, and the health system: influencers on patients’ participation in ward rounds Walton, Victoria Hogden, Anne Long, Janet C Johnson, Julie K Greenfield, David Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: The ward round is an opportunity to plan and deliver patient-centered care. Benefits include an effective and safer clinician-patient relationship, patient empowerment, reduced anxiety and increased trust in the health care system. Factors contributing to patient involvement in ward rounds is shaped by their preferences, ability, and opportunity. AIM: To investigate ward rounds and the patient experience with them, the relationship between the patient and clinicians, and how rounds facilitate collaboration between them. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multimethod study was conducted in a single Australian facility in acute medicine and rehabilitation specialties. An observational study of ward rounds in each setting was conducted with 14 patients, aged between 55 and 89 years followed by semi-structured interviews conducted with the patients observed. Descriptive and thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: One third of participants had not heard of the term ward round or could describe their purpose. Three main influencers on the patient experience of rounds were: self; the health system; and medical officers. No meaningful difference was found between patients in acute medicine and rehabilitation although all wanted to receive information from the senior medical officers. Patients more familiar with the health system were more active participants and took greater responsibility for their involvement in rounds and described higher satisfaction. CONCLUSION: There is a level of acceptance within the health system that patients understand what a ward round is. However, their role on the round is complex and this may only be developed through experiencing them. High system users teach themselves to navigate rounding processes to ensure their needs are met. To ensure equity in participation patients should be educated on ward rounds, what to expect and how to they can participate. Dove 2019-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6710545/ /pubmed/31692552 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S211073 Text en © 2019 Walton et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Walton, Victoria Hogden, Anne Long, Janet C Johnson, Julie K Greenfield, David Patients, health professionals, and the health system: influencers on patients’ participation in ward rounds |
title | Patients, health professionals, and the health system: influencers on patients’ participation in ward rounds |
title_full | Patients, health professionals, and the health system: influencers on patients’ participation in ward rounds |
title_fullStr | Patients, health professionals, and the health system: influencers on patients’ participation in ward rounds |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients, health professionals, and the health system: influencers on patients’ participation in ward rounds |
title_short | Patients, health professionals, and the health system: influencers on patients’ participation in ward rounds |
title_sort | patients, health professionals, and the health system: influencers on patients’ participation in ward rounds |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31692552 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S211073 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waltonvictoria patientshealthprofessionalsandthehealthsysteminfluencersonpatientsparticipationinwardrounds AT hogdenanne patientshealthprofessionalsandthehealthsysteminfluencersonpatientsparticipationinwardrounds AT longjanetc patientshealthprofessionalsandthehealthsysteminfluencersonpatientsparticipationinwardrounds AT johnsonjuliek patientshealthprofessionalsandthehealthsysteminfluencersonpatientsparticipationinwardrounds AT greenfielddavid patientshealthprofessionalsandthehealthsysteminfluencersonpatientsparticipationinwardrounds |