Cargando…

Animal learning may contribute to both problems and solutions for wildlife–train collisions

Transportation infrastructure can cause an ecological trap if it attracts wildlife for foraging and travel opportunities, while increasing the risk of mortality from collisions. This situation occurs for a vulnerable population of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in Banff National Park, Canada, where tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: St. Clair, Colleen Cassady, Backs, Jonathan, Friesen, Alyssa, Gangadharan, Aditya, Gilhooly, Patrick, Murray, Maureen, Pollock, Sonya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31352891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0050
_version_ 1783446372821762048
author St. Clair, Colleen Cassady
Backs, Jonathan
Friesen, Alyssa
Gangadharan, Aditya
Gilhooly, Patrick
Murray, Maureen
Pollock, Sonya
author_facet St. Clair, Colleen Cassady
Backs, Jonathan
Friesen, Alyssa
Gangadharan, Aditya
Gilhooly, Patrick
Murray, Maureen
Pollock, Sonya
author_sort St. Clair, Colleen Cassady
collection PubMed
description Transportation infrastructure can cause an ecological trap if it attracts wildlife for foraging and travel opportunities, while increasing the risk of mortality from collisions. This situation occurs for a vulnerable population of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in Banff National Park, Canada, where train strikes have become a leading cause of mortality. We explored this problem with analyses of rail-associated food attractants, habitat use of GPS-collared bears and patterns of past mortality. Bears appeared to be attracted to grain spilled from rail cars, enhanced growth of adjacent vegetation and train-killed ungulates with rail use that increased in spring and autumn, and in areas where trains slowed, topography was rugged, and human density was low. However, areas with higher grain deposits or greater use by bears did not predict sites of past mortality. The onset of reported train strikes occurred amid several other interacting changes in this landscape, including the cessation of lethal bear management, changes in the distribution and abundance of ungulates, increasing human use and new anthropogenic features. We posit that rapid learning by bears is critical to their persistence in this landscape and that this capacity might be enhanced to prevent train strikes in future with simple warning devices, such as the one we invented, that signal approaching trains. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Linking behaviour to dynamics of populations and communities: application of novel approaches in behavioural ecology to conservation’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6710577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67105772019-08-28 Animal learning may contribute to both problems and solutions for wildlife–train collisions St. Clair, Colleen Cassady Backs, Jonathan Friesen, Alyssa Gangadharan, Aditya Gilhooly, Patrick Murray, Maureen Pollock, Sonya Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Transportation infrastructure can cause an ecological trap if it attracts wildlife for foraging and travel opportunities, while increasing the risk of mortality from collisions. This situation occurs for a vulnerable population of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in Banff National Park, Canada, where train strikes have become a leading cause of mortality. We explored this problem with analyses of rail-associated food attractants, habitat use of GPS-collared bears and patterns of past mortality. Bears appeared to be attracted to grain spilled from rail cars, enhanced growth of adjacent vegetation and train-killed ungulates with rail use that increased in spring and autumn, and in areas where trains slowed, topography was rugged, and human density was low. However, areas with higher grain deposits or greater use by bears did not predict sites of past mortality. The onset of reported train strikes occurred amid several other interacting changes in this landscape, including the cessation of lethal bear management, changes in the distribution and abundance of ungulates, increasing human use and new anthropogenic features. We posit that rapid learning by bears is critical to their persistence in this landscape and that this capacity might be enhanced to prevent train strikes in future with simple warning devices, such as the one we invented, that signal approaching trains. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Linking behaviour to dynamics of populations and communities: application of novel approaches in behavioural ecology to conservation’. The Royal Society 2019-09-16 2019-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6710577/ /pubmed/31352891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0050 Text en © 2019 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
St. Clair, Colleen Cassady
Backs, Jonathan
Friesen, Alyssa
Gangadharan, Aditya
Gilhooly, Patrick
Murray, Maureen
Pollock, Sonya
Animal learning may contribute to both problems and solutions for wildlife–train collisions
title Animal learning may contribute to both problems and solutions for wildlife–train collisions
title_full Animal learning may contribute to both problems and solutions for wildlife–train collisions
title_fullStr Animal learning may contribute to both problems and solutions for wildlife–train collisions
title_full_unstemmed Animal learning may contribute to both problems and solutions for wildlife–train collisions
title_short Animal learning may contribute to both problems and solutions for wildlife–train collisions
title_sort animal learning may contribute to both problems and solutions for wildlife–train collisions
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31352891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0050
work_keys_str_mv AT stclaircolleencassady animallearningmaycontributetobothproblemsandsolutionsforwildlifetraincollisions
AT backsjonathan animallearningmaycontributetobothproblemsandsolutionsforwildlifetraincollisions
AT friesenalyssa animallearningmaycontributetobothproblemsandsolutionsforwildlifetraincollisions
AT gangadharanaditya animallearningmaycontributetobothproblemsandsolutionsforwildlifetraincollisions
AT gilhoolypatrick animallearningmaycontributetobothproblemsandsolutionsforwildlifetraincollisions
AT murraymaureen animallearningmaycontributetobothproblemsandsolutionsforwildlifetraincollisions
AT pollocksonya animallearningmaycontributetobothproblemsandsolutionsforwildlifetraincollisions