Cargando…

De-escalating chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer?

BACKGROUND: Although adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with stage II colon cancer characterized by poor prognostic features, its pros and cons remain a controversial issue. We aim to evaluate the real effectiveness of chemotherapy on stage II colon cancer as well as select suitable p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Jianfei, Wu, Lunpo, Ge, Chenyang, Xu, Tiantian, Li, Dan, Fu, Wei, Wang, Liangjing, Du, Jinlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284819867553
_version_ 1783446388292452352
author Fu, Jianfei
Wu, Lunpo
Ge, Chenyang
Xu, Tiantian
Li, Dan
Fu, Wei
Wang, Liangjing
Du, Jinlin
author_facet Fu, Jianfei
Wu, Lunpo
Ge, Chenyang
Xu, Tiantian
Li, Dan
Fu, Wei
Wang, Liangjing
Du, Jinlin
author_sort Fu, Jianfei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with stage II colon cancer characterized by poor prognostic features, its pros and cons remain a controversial issue. We aim to evaluate the real effectiveness of chemotherapy on stage II colon cancer as well as select suitable patients. METHODS: Patients during 1988–2013 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The competing risk regression model and propensity score matching method were used to evaluate colon-cancer-specific death (CCSD) and non-CCSD. Also, a competing-risk nomogram was constructed to identify risk of patients. Risk score (RS) was calculated according to nomogram. RESULTS: A total of 58,133 patients were included, 25.66% received chemotherapy, and 74.34% were without chemotherapy. In total, 19.95% and 25.78% of patients died of CCSD and non-CCSD, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that receiving chemotherapy appears to be associated with more CCSD and less non-CCSD (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.18–1.28; HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.43–0.47, respectively), even after adjustment for covariates and propensity score weighting. A competing-risk nomogram was established; the model was relatively good with a C-index of 0.661. Based on the RS, risk stage could only predict prognosis but failed to predict the benefit from chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The value of chemotherapy is much less than we thought. It is time to de-escalate chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. CCSD, rather than overall survival, should be considered as an appropriate primary end point for future trials in stage II colon cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6710694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67106942019-09-05 De-escalating chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer? Fu, Jianfei Wu, Lunpo Ge, Chenyang Xu, Tiantian Li, Dan Fu, Wei Wang, Liangjing Du, Jinlin Therap Adv Gastroenterol Original Research BACKGROUND: Although adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with stage II colon cancer characterized by poor prognostic features, its pros and cons remain a controversial issue. We aim to evaluate the real effectiveness of chemotherapy on stage II colon cancer as well as select suitable patients. METHODS: Patients during 1988–2013 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The competing risk regression model and propensity score matching method were used to evaluate colon-cancer-specific death (CCSD) and non-CCSD. Also, a competing-risk nomogram was constructed to identify risk of patients. Risk score (RS) was calculated according to nomogram. RESULTS: A total of 58,133 patients were included, 25.66% received chemotherapy, and 74.34% were without chemotherapy. In total, 19.95% and 25.78% of patients died of CCSD and non-CCSD, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that receiving chemotherapy appears to be associated with more CCSD and less non-CCSD (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.18–1.28; HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.43–0.47, respectively), even after adjustment for covariates and propensity score weighting. A competing-risk nomogram was established; the model was relatively good with a C-index of 0.661. Based on the RS, risk stage could only predict prognosis but failed to predict the benefit from chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The value of chemotherapy is much less than we thought. It is time to de-escalate chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. CCSD, rather than overall survival, should be considered as an appropriate primary end point for future trials in stage II colon cancer. SAGE Publications 2019-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6710694/ /pubmed/31489031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284819867553 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Fu, Jianfei
Wu, Lunpo
Ge, Chenyang
Xu, Tiantian
Li, Dan
Fu, Wei
Wang, Liangjing
Du, Jinlin
De-escalating chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer?
title De-escalating chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer?
title_full De-escalating chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer?
title_fullStr De-escalating chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer?
title_full_unstemmed De-escalating chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer?
title_short De-escalating chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer?
title_sort de-escalating chemotherapy for stage ii colon cancer?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284819867553
work_keys_str_mv AT fujianfei deescalatingchemotherapyforstageiicoloncancer
AT wulunpo deescalatingchemotherapyforstageiicoloncancer
AT gechenyang deescalatingchemotherapyforstageiicoloncancer
AT xutiantian deescalatingchemotherapyforstageiicoloncancer
AT lidan deescalatingchemotherapyforstageiicoloncancer
AT fuwei deescalatingchemotherapyforstageiicoloncancer
AT wangliangjing deescalatingchemotherapyforstageiicoloncancer
AT dujinlin deescalatingchemotherapyforstageiicoloncancer