Cargando…

Cancer Panel Assay for Precision Oncology Clinic: Results from a 1-Year Study

Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based cancer panel tests are actively being applied in the clinic for precision oncology. Given the importance of NGS panel tests in the palliative clinical setting, it is critical to understand success rates, factors responsible for test failures, and the incidence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwon, Dohee, Kim, Binnari, Shin, Hyeong Chan, Kim, Eun Ji, Ha, Sang Yun, Jang, Kee-Taek, Kim, Seung Tae, Lee, Jeeyun, Kang, Won Ki, Park, Joon Oh, Kim, Kyoung-Mee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31442744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2019.07.017
_version_ 1783446418896191488
author Kwon, Dohee
Kim, Binnari
Shin, Hyeong Chan
Kim, Eun Ji
Ha, Sang Yun
Jang, Kee-Taek
Kim, Seung Tae
Lee, Jeeyun
Kang, Won Ki
Park, Joon Oh
Kim, Kyoung-Mee
author_facet Kwon, Dohee
Kim, Binnari
Shin, Hyeong Chan
Kim, Eun Ji
Ha, Sang Yun
Jang, Kee-Taek
Kim, Seung Tae
Lee, Jeeyun
Kang, Won Ki
Park, Joon Oh
Kim, Kyoung-Mee
author_sort Kwon, Dohee
collection PubMed
description Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based cancer panel tests are actively being applied in the clinic for precision oncology. Given the importance of NGS panel tests in the palliative clinical setting, it is critical to understand success rates, factors responsible for test failures, and the incidence of clinically meaningful genetic alterations. We performed NGS cancer panel test with tumors from the stomach (n = 234), colorectum (n = 196), and rare tumors (n = 105) from 535 recurrent or metastatic cancer patients for 1 year. Sequencing was successful in 483 (95.3%) archival tumor samples to find single nucleotide variant (SNV), copy number alteration (CNA), and fusion. NGS testing was unsuccessful in 52 (9.7%) specimens due to inadequate tissue (n = 28), low tumor volume (n = 19), and poor quality of nucleic acid (n = 5). According to the Tier system, variants were classified as Tier IA, 0.8%; IIC, 10.3%; IID, 2.0%; III, 66.7% for gastric: Tier IA, 3.6%; IIC, 11.6% for colorectal: Tier IA, 1.6%; IIC, 13.5%; IID, 0.5%; III, 70.8% for melanoma, and Tier IA, 9.1%; IIC, 1.8%; IID, 1.0%; III, 66.4% for GIST. In total, 30.8% of 483 sequenced cases harbored clinically meaningful variants. In Tier IA, KRAS and ERBB2 were the most commonly altered genes. Interestingly, we identified CD274 (PD-L1) amplification, PTPN11 (SHP2) SNV, TPM3-NTRK1 fusion, and FGFR3-TACC3 fusion as a rare (<2%) alteration having therapeutic targets. In conclusion, although small biopsy samples constitute half of cases, informative NGS results were successfully reported in >90% of archival tissue samples, and 30.8% of them harbored clinically meaningful variants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6710823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Neoplasia Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67108232019-08-29 Cancer Panel Assay for Precision Oncology Clinic: Results from a 1-Year Study Kwon, Dohee Kim, Binnari Shin, Hyeong Chan Kim, Eun Ji Ha, Sang Yun Jang, Kee-Taek Kim, Seung Tae Lee, Jeeyun Kang, Won Ki Park, Joon Oh Kim, Kyoung-Mee Transl Oncol Original article Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based cancer panel tests are actively being applied in the clinic for precision oncology. Given the importance of NGS panel tests in the palliative clinical setting, it is critical to understand success rates, factors responsible for test failures, and the incidence of clinically meaningful genetic alterations. We performed NGS cancer panel test with tumors from the stomach (n = 234), colorectum (n = 196), and rare tumors (n = 105) from 535 recurrent or metastatic cancer patients for 1 year. Sequencing was successful in 483 (95.3%) archival tumor samples to find single nucleotide variant (SNV), copy number alteration (CNA), and fusion. NGS testing was unsuccessful in 52 (9.7%) specimens due to inadequate tissue (n = 28), low tumor volume (n = 19), and poor quality of nucleic acid (n = 5). According to the Tier system, variants were classified as Tier IA, 0.8%; IIC, 10.3%; IID, 2.0%; III, 66.7% for gastric: Tier IA, 3.6%; IIC, 11.6% for colorectal: Tier IA, 1.6%; IIC, 13.5%; IID, 0.5%; III, 70.8% for melanoma, and Tier IA, 9.1%; IIC, 1.8%; IID, 1.0%; III, 66.4% for GIST. In total, 30.8% of 483 sequenced cases harbored clinically meaningful variants. In Tier IA, KRAS and ERBB2 were the most commonly altered genes. Interestingly, we identified CD274 (PD-L1) amplification, PTPN11 (SHP2) SNV, TPM3-NTRK1 fusion, and FGFR3-TACC3 fusion as a rare (<2%) alteration having therapeutic targets. In conclusion, although small biopsy samples constitute half of cases, informative NGS results were successfully reported in >90% of archival tissue samples, and 30.8% of them harbored clinically meaningful variants. Neoplasia Press 2019-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6710823/ /pubmed/31442744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2019.07.017 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original article
Kwon, Dohee
Kim, Binnari
Shin, Hyeong Chan
Kim, Eun Ji
Ha, Sang Yun
Jang, Kee-Taek
Kim, Seung Tae
Lee, Jeeyun
Kang, Won Ki
Park, Joon Oh
Kim, Kyoung-Mee
Cancer Panel Assay for Precision Oncology Clinic: Results from a 1-Year Study
title Cancer Panel Assay for Precision Oncology Clinic: Results from a 1-Year Study
title_full Cancer Panel Assay for Precision Oncology Clinic: Results from a 1-Year Study
title_fullStr Cancer Panel Assay for Precision Oncology Clinic: Results from a 1-Year Study
title_full_unstemmed Cancer Panel Assay for Precision Oncology Clinic: Results from a 1-Year Study
title_short Cancer Panel Assay for Precision Oncology Clinic: Results from a 1-Year Study
title_sort cancer panel assay for precision oncology clinic: results from a 1-year study
topic Original article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31442744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2019.07.017
work_keys_str_mv AT kwondohee cancerpanelassayforprecisiononcologyclinicresultsfroma1yearstudy
AT kimbinnari cancerpanelassayforprecisiononcologyclinicresultsfroma1yearstudy
AT shinhyeongchan cancerpanelassayforprecisiononcologyclinicresultsfroma1yearstudy
AT kimeunji cancerpanelassayforprecisiononcologyclinicresultsfroma1yearstudy
AT hasangyun cancerpanelassayforprecisiononcologyclinicresultsfroma1yearstudy
AT jangkeetaek cancerpanelassayforprecisiononcologyclinicresultsfroma1yearstudy
AT kimseungtae cancerpanelassayforprecisiononcologyclinicresultsfroma1yearstudy
AT leejeeyun cancerpanelassayforprecisiononcologyclinicresultsfroma1yearstudy
AT kangwonki cancerpanelassayforprecisiononcologyclinicresultsfroma1yearstudy
AT parkjoonoh cancerpanelassayforprecisiononcologyclinicresultsfroma1yearstudy
AT kimkyoungmee cancerpanelassayforprecisiononcologyclinicresultsfroma1yearstudy