Cargando…
The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Muscle energy techniques are applied to reduce pain and increase range of motion. These are applied to a variety of pathological conditions and on asymptomatic subjects. There is however limited knowledge on their effectiveness and which protocol may be the most beneficial. OBJECTIVE: Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0258-7 |
_version_ | 1783446427535409152 |
---|---|
author | Thomas, Ewan Cavallaro, Antonio Rosario Mani, Diba Bianco, Antonino Palma, Antonio |
author_facet | Thomas, Ewan Cavallaro, Antonio Rosario Mani, Diba Bianco, Antonino Palma, Antonio |
author_sort | Thomas, Ewan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Muscle energy techniques are applied to reduce pain and increase range of motion. These are applied to a variety of pathological conditions and on asymptomatic subjects. There is however limited knowledge on their effectiveness and which protocol may be the most beneficial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to determine the efficacy of muscle energy techniques (MET) in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. DESIGN: Systematic Review. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the following database: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, NLM Pubmed and ScienceDirect. Studies regarding MET in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were considered for investigation. The main outcomes took into account range of motion, chronic and acute pain and trigger points. Two trained investigators independently screened eligible studies according to the eligibility criteria, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Randomized control trials (RCT’s) were analyzed for quality using the PEDro scale. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies were considered eligible and included in the quantitative synthesis: 14 regarding symptomatic patients and 12 regarding asymptomatic subjects. Quality assessment of the studies through the PEDro scale observed a “moderate to high” quality of the included records. CONCLUSIONS: MET are an effective treatment for reducing chronic and acute pain of the lower back. MET are also effective in treating chronic neck pain and chronic lateral epicondylitis. MET can be applied to increase range of motion of a joint when a functional limitation is present. Other techniques seem to be more appropriate compared to MET for trigger points. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6710873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67108732019-08-28 The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review Thomas, Ewan Cavallaro, Antonio Rosario Mani, Diba Bianco, Antonino Palma, Antonio Chiropr Man Therap Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Muscle energy techniques are applied to reduce pain and increase range of motion. These are applied to a variety of pathological conditions and on asymptomatic subjects. There is however limited knowledge on their effectiveness and which protocol may be the most beneficial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to determine the efficacy of muscle energy techniques (MET) in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. DESIGN: Systematic Review. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the following database: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, NLM Pubmed and ScienceDirect. Studies regarding MET in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were considered for investigation. The main outcomes took into account range of motion, chronic and acute pain and trigger points. Two trained investigators independently screened eligible studies according to the eligibility criteria, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Randomized control trials (RCT’s) were analyzed for quality using the PEDro scale. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies were considered eligible and included in the quantitative synthesis: 14 regarding symptomatic patients and 12 regarding asymptomatic subjects. Quality assessment of the studies through the PEDro scale observed a “moderate to high” quality of the included records. CONCLUSIONS: MET are an effective treatment for reducing chronic and acute pain of the lower back. MET are also effective in treating chronic neck pain and chronic lateral epicondylitis. MET can be applied to increase range of motion of a joint when a functional limitation is present. Other techniques seem to be more appropriate compared to MET for trigger points. BioMed Central 2019-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6710873/ /pubmed/31462989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0258-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Thomas, Ewan Cavallaro, Antonio Rosario Mani, Diba Bianco, Antonino Palma, Antonio The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review |
title | The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review |
title_full | The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review |
title_short | The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review |
title_sort | efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0258-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasewan theefficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview AT cavallaroantoniorosario theefficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview AT manidiba theefficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview AT biancoantonino theefficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview AT palmaantonio theefficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview AT thomasewan efficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview AT cavallaroantoniorosario efficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview AT manidiba efficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview AT biancoantonino efficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview AT palmaantonio efficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview |