Cargando…

The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Muscle energy techniques are applied to reduce pain and increase range of motion. These are applied to a variety of pathological conditions and on asymptomatic subjects. There is however limited knowledge on their effectiveness and which protocol may be the most beneficial. OBJECTIVE: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Ewan, Cavallaro, Antonio Rosario, Mani, Diba, Bianco, Antonino, Palma, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0258-7
_version_ 1783446427535409152
author Thomas, Ewan
Cavallaro, Antonio Rosario
Mani, Diba
Bianco, Antonino
Palma, Antonio
author_facet Thomas, Ewan
Cavallaro, Antonio Rosario
Mani, Diba
Bianco, Antonino
Palma, Antonio
author_sort Thomas, Ewan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Muscle energy techniques are applied to reduce pain and increase range of motion. These are applied to a variety of pathological conditions and on asymptomatic subjects. There is however limited knowledge on their effectiveness and which protocol may be the most beneficial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to determine the efficacy of muscle energy techniques (MET) in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. DESIGN: Systematic Review. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the following database: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, NLM Pubmed and ScienceDirect. Studies regarding MET in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were considered for investigation. The main outcomes took into account range of motion, chronic and acute pain and trigger points. Two trained investigators independently screened eligible studies according to the eligibility criteria, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Randomized control trials (RCT’s) were analyzed for quality using the PEDro scale. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies were considered eligible and included in the quantitative synthesis: 14 regarding symptomatic patients and 12 regarding asymptomatic subjects. Quality assessment of the studies through the PEDro scale observed a “moderate to high” quality of the included records. CONCLUSIONS: MET are an effective treatment for reducing chronic and acute pain of the lower back. MET are also effective in treating chronic neck pain and chronic lateral epicondylitis. MET can be applied to increase range of motion of a joint when a functional limitation is present. Other techniques seem to be more appropriate compared to MET for trigger points.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6710873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67108732019-08-28 The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review Thomas, Ewan Cavallaro, Antonio Rosario Mani, Diba Bianco, Antonino Palma, Antonio Chiropr Man Therap Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Muscle energy techniques are applied to reduce pain and increase range of motion. These are applied to a variety of pathological conditions and on asymptomatic subjects. There is however limited knowledge on their effectiveness and which protocol may be the most beneficial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to determine the efficacy of muscle energy techniques (MET) in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. DESIGN: Systematic Review. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the following database: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, NLM Pubmed and ScienceDirect. Studies regarding MET in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were considered for investigation. The main outcomes took into account range of motion, chronic and acute pain and trigger points. Two trained investigators independently screened eligible studies according to the eligibility criteria, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Randomized control trials (RCT’s) were analyzed for quality using the PEDro scale. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies were considered eligible and included in the quantitative synthesis: 14 regarding symptomatic patients and 12 regarding asymptomatic subjects. Quality assessment of the studies through the PEDro scale observed a “moderate to high” quality of the included records. CONCLUSIONS: MET are an effective treatment for reducing chronic and acute pain of the lower back. MET are also effective in treating chronic neck pain and chronic lateral epicondylitis. MET can be applied to increase range of motion of a joint when a functional limitation is present. Other techniques seem to be more appropriate compared to MET for trigger points. BioMed Central 2019-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6710873/ /pubmed/31462989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0258-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Thomas, Ewan
Cavallaro, Antonio Rosario
Mani, Diba
Bianco, Antonino
Palma, Antonio
The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review
title The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review
title_full The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review
title_fullStr The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review
title_short The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review
title_sort efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0258-7
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasewan theefficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview
AT cavallaroantoniorosario theefficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview
AT manidiba theefficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview
AT biancoantonino theefficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview
AT palmaantonio theefficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview
AT thomasewan efficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview
AT cavallaroantoniorosario efficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview
AT manidiba efficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview
AT biancoantonino efficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview
AT palmaantonio efficacyofmuscleenergytechniquesinsymptomaticandasymptomaticsubjectsasystematicreview