Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive treatment in IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive agents have been widely used in the treatment of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), but the efficacy and safety remain controversial. The recent STOP-IgAN and TESTING studies have again focused attention on the application of immunosuppressive agents in IgAN. This study investigat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Zheng, Yang, Yue, Jiang, Shi-min, Li, Wen-ge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31455248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1519-3
_version_ 1783446429617881088
author Zhang, Zheng
Yang, Yue
Jiang, Shi-min
Li, Wen-ge
author_facet Zhang, Zheng
Yang, Yue
Jiang, Shi-min
Li, Wen-ge
author_sort Zhang, Zheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive agents have been widely used in the treatment of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), but the efficacy and safety remain controversial. The recent STOP-IgAN and TESTING studies have again focused attention on the application of immunosuppressive agents in IgAN. This study investigated the benefits and risks of immunosuppressive agents in IgAN. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and article reference lists were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immunosuppressive agents with any other non-immunosuppressive agents for treating IgAN. A meta-analysis was performed on the outcomes of proteinuria, creatinine (Cr), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and adverse events in patients with IgAN, and trial sequential analyses were also performed for outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-nine RCTs (1957 patients) that met our inclusion criteria were identified. Steroids (weighted mean difference [WMD] –0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] –1.2 to − 0.20), non-steroidal immunosuppressive agents (NSI) (WMD –0. 43, 95% CI − 0.55 to − 0.31), and combined steroidal and non-steroidal immunosuppressive agents (S&NSI) (WMD –1.46, 95% CI − 2.13 to − 0.79) therapy significantly reduced proteinuria levels compared with the the control group. Steroid treatment significantly reduced the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (relative risk [RR] 0.39, CI 0.19 to 0.79) compared with the control group. The immunosuppressive therapy group showed significant increases in gastrointestinal, hematological, dermatological, and genitourinary side effects, as well as impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes. Hyperkalemia was more common in the control group. CONCLUSION: Immunosuppressive therapy can significantly reduce proteinuria and ESRD risk in patients with IgAN, but with a concomitant increase in adverse reactions. Therefore, care is required in the application of immunosuppressive agents in IgAN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6710882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67108822019-08-28 Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive treatment in IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Zhang, Zheng Yang, Yue Jiang, Shi-min Li, Wen-ge BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive agents have been widely used in the treatment of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), but the efficacy and safety remain controversial. The recent STOP-IgAN and TESTING studies have again focused attention on the application of immunosuppressive agents in IgAN. This study investigated the benefits and risks of immunosuppressive agents in IgAN. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and article reference lists were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immunosuppressive agents with any other non-immunosuppressive agents for treating IgAN. A meta-analysis was performed on the outcomes of proteinuria, creatinine (Cr), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and adverse events in patients with IgAN, and trial sequential analyses were also performed for outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-nine RCTs (1957 patients) that met our inclusion criteria were identified. Steroids (weighted mean difference [WMD] –0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] –1.2 to − 0.20), non-steroidal immunosuppressive agents (NSI) (WMD –0. 43, 95% CI − 0.55 to − 0.31), and combined steroidal and non-steroidal immunosuppressive agents (S&NSI) (WMD –1.46, 95% CI − 2.13 to − 0.79) therapy significantly reduced proteinuria levels compared with the the control group. Steroid treatment significantly reduced the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (relative risk [RR] 0.39, CI 0.19 to 0.79) compared with the control group. The immunosuppressive therapy group showed significant increases in gastrointestinal, hematological, dermatological, and genitourinary side effects, as well as impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes. Hyperkalemia was more common in the control group. CONCLUSION: Immunosuppressive therapy can significantly reduce proteinuria and ESRD risk in patients with IgAN, but with a concomitant increase in adverse reactions. Therefore, care is required in the application of immunosuppressive agents in IgAN. BioMed Central 2019-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6710882/ /pubmed/31455248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1519-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Zheng
Yang, Yue
Jiang, Shi-min
Li, Wen-ge
Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive treatment in IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive treatment in IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive treatment in IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive treatment in IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive treatment in IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive treatment in IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive treatment in iga nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31455248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1519-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangzheng efficacyandsafetyofimmunosuppressivetreatmentiniganephropathyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yangyue efficacyandsafetyofimmunosuppressivetreatmentiniganephropathyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jiangshimin efficacyandsafetyofimmunosuppressivetreatmentiniganephropathyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liwenge efficacyandsafetyofimmunosuppressivetreatmentiniganephropathyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials