Cargando…

Peak, Fluctuation, or Mean? A Correlation Analysis of Long-term Intraocular Pressure Variation Parameters in Patients with Stable Glaucoma

AIM: To perform a correlation analysis between long-term intraocular pressure (IOP) variation parameters (mean, peak, and fluctuation) in patients with stable open-angle glaucoma (OAG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was carried out, in which patients with stable OAG we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scoralick, Ana Luiza B, Gracitelli, Carolina PB, Dias, Diego T, Almeida, Izabela, Ushida, Michele, Dorairaj, Syril, Kanadani, Fábio N, Paranhos, Augusto, Prata, Tiago S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31496558
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1240
_version_ 1783446438690160640
author Scoralick, Ana Luiza B
Gracitelli, Carolina PB
Dias, Diego T
Almeida, Izabela
Ushida, Michele
Dorairaj, Syril
Kanadani, Fábio N
Paranhos, Augusto
Prata, Tiago S
author_facet Scoralick, Ana Luiza B
Gracitelli, Carolina PB
Dias, Diego T
Almeida, Izabela
Ushida, Michele
Dorairaj, Syril
Kanadani, Fábio N
Paranhos, Augusto
Prata, Tiago S
author_sort Scoralick, Ana Luiza B
collection PubMed
description AIM: To perform a correlation analysis between long-term intraocular pressure (IOP) variation parameters (mean, peak, and fluctuation) in patients with stable open-angle glaucoma (OAG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was carried out, in which patients with stable OAG were consecutively enrolled. All patients had to have glaucomatous optic neuropathy and characteristic visual field (VF) defects. Key inclusion criteria were ≥5 VF tests, ≥3 disc photographs, and ≥3 years of follow-up without any changes in current medical regimen. Stable OAG was defined as nonprogressive VF results and absence of anatomical changes for at least 3 years. Long-term IOP variation parameters were obtained from isolated IOP measurements from each visit (minimum of five IOP measurements). The main outcome measure was the correlation between these IOP variation parameters. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients studied, 37 (59%) were women, and the mean age was 61 ± 12 years. Among all the analyses, IOP mean and peak had the strongest correlation (r = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.92–0.97; p < 0.001). There were also significant correlations between IOP peak and IOP fluctuation (r = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.75–0.90; p < 0.001), and mean IOP and IOP fluctuation (r = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.43–0.75; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Most long-term IOP variation parameters evaluated seem to be highly correlated. Notably, the correlation between mean IOP and IOP peak was the strongest one. We believe this fact should be taken into consideration as their inclusion as individual variables in a multiple regression model could lead to misinterpretation of the data. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Different well-designed studies are conflicting regarding which long-term IOP variation parameter is more clinically relevant. Our findings suggest that collinearity issues could explain in part the discrepant results among these studies evaluating the relationship between long-term IOP variation parameters and glaucoma prognosis. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Scoralick ALB, Gracitelli CPB, et al. Peak, Fluctuation, or Mean? A Correlation Analysis of Long-term Intraocular Pressure Variation Parameters in Patients with Stable Glaucoma. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2019;13(1):28–31.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6710932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67109322019-09-06 Peak, Fluctuation, or Mean? A Correlation Analysis of Long-term Intraocular Pressure Variation Parameters in Patients with Stable Glaucoma Scoralick, Ana Luiza B Gracitelli, Carolina PB Dias, Diego T Almeida, Izabela Ushida, Michele Dorairaj, Syril Kanadani, Fábio N Paranhos, Augusto Prata, Tiago S J Curr Glaucoma Pract Research Article AIM: To perform a correlation analysis between long-term intraocular pressure (IOP) variation parameters (mean, peak, and fluctuation) in patients with stable open-angle glaucoma (OAG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was carried out, in which patients with stable OAG were consecutively enrolled. All patients had to have glaucomatous optic neuropathy and characteristic visual field (VF) defects. Key inclusion criteria were ≥5 VF tests, ≥3 disc photographs, and ≥3 years of follow-up without any changes in current medical regimen. Stable OAG was defined as nonprogressive VF results and absence of anatomical changes for at least 3 years. Long-term IOP variation parameters were obtained from isolated IOP measurements from each visit (minimum of five IOP measurements). The main outcome measure was the correlation between these IOP variation parameters. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients studied, 37 (59%) were women, and the mean age was 61 ± 12 years. Among all the analyses, IOP mean and peak had the strongest correlation (r = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.92–0.97; p < 0.001). There were also significant correlations between IOP peak and IOP fluctuation (r = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.75–0.90; p < 0.001), and mean IOP and IOP fluctuation (r = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.43–0.75; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Most long-term IOP variation parameters evaluated seem to be highly correlated. Notably, the correlation between mean IOP and IOP peak was the strongest one. We believe this fact should be taken into consideration as their inclusion as individual variables in a multiple regression model could lead to misinterpretation of the data. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Different well-designed studies are conflicting regarding which long-term IOP variation parameter is more clinically relevant. Our findings suggest that collinearity issues could explain in part the discrepant results among these studies evaluating the relationship between long-term IOP variation parameters and glaucoma prognosis. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Scoralick ALB, Gracitelli CPB, et al. Peak, Fluctuation, or Mean? A Correlation Analysis of Long-term Intraocular Pressure Variation Parameters in Patients with Stable Glaucoma. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2019;13(1):28–31. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6710932/ /pubmed/31496558 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1240 Text en Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Article
Scoralick, Ana Luiza B
Gracitelli, Carolina PB
Dias, Diego T
Almeida, Izabela
Ushida, Michele
Dorairaj, Syril
Kanadani, Fábio N
Paranhos, Augusto
Prata, Tiago S
Peak, Fluctuation, or Mean? A Correlation Analysis of Long-term Intraocular Pressure Variation Parameters in Patients with Stable Glaucoma
title Peak, Fluctuation, or Mean? A Correlation Analysis of Long-term Intraocular Pressure Variation Parameters in Patients with Stable Glaucoma
title_full Peak, Fluctuation, or Mean? A Correlation Analysis of Long-term Intraocular Pressure Variation Parameters in Patients with Stable Glaucoma
title_fullStr Peak, Fluctuation, or Mean? A Correlation Analysis of Long-term Intraocular Pressure Variation Parameters in Patients with Stable Glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Peak, Fluctuation, or Mean? A Correlation Analysis of Long-term Intraocular Pressure Variation Parameters in Patients with Stable Glaucoma
title_short Peak, Fluctuation, or Mean? A Correlation Analysis of Long-term Intraocular Pressure Variation Parameters in Patients with Stable Glaucoma
title_sort peak, fluctuation, or mean? a correlation analysis of long-term intraocular pressure variation parameters in patients with stable glaucoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31496558
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1240
work_keys_str_mv AT scoralickanaluizab peakfluctuationormeanacorrelationanalysisoflongtermintraocularpressurevariationparametersinpatientswithstableglaucoma
AT gracitellicarolinapb peakfluctuationormeanacorrelationanalysisoflongtermintraocularpressurevariationparametersinpatientswithstableglaucoma
AT diasdiegot peakfluctuationormeanacorrelationanalysisoflongtermintraocularpressurevariationparametersinpatientswithstableglaucoma
AT almeidaizabela peakfluctuationormeanacorrelationanalysisoflongtermintraocularpressurevariationparametersinpatientswithstableglaucoma
AT ushidamichele peakfluctuationormeanacorrelationanalysisoflongtermintraocularpressurevariationparametersinpatientswithstableglaucoma
AT dorairajsyril peakfluctuationormeanacorrelationanalysisoflongtermintraocularpressurevariationparametersinpatientswithstableglaucoma
AT kanadanifabion peakfluctuationormeanacorrelationanalysisoflongtermintraocularpressurevariationparametersinpatientswithstableglaucoma
AT paranhosaugusto peakfluctuationormeanacorrelationanalysisoflongtermintraocularpressurevariationparametersinpatientswithstableglaucoma
AT pratatiagos peakfluctuationormeanacorrelationanalysisoflongtermintraocularpressurevariationparametersinpatientswithstableglaucoma