Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Pulpotomized Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the fracture strength of pulpotomized primary molars restored with amalgam, miracle mix, cermet, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, and nanocomposites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty primary first and second molars were collected for this study. All the teeth were rando...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammad, Noorjahan, Pattanaik, Snigdha, Reddy, Thimma BV, Animireddy, Dwitha, Ankireddy, Swetha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31496563
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1576
_version_ 1783446443881660416
author Mohammad, Noorjahan
Pattanaik, Snigdha
Reddy, Thimma BV
Animireddy, Dwitha
Ankireddy, Swetha
author_facet Mohammad, Noorjahan
Pattanaik, Snigdha
Reddy, Thimma BV
Animireddy, Dwitha
Ankireddy, Swetha
author_sort Mohammad, Noorjahan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study evaluates the fracture strength of pulpotomized primary molars restored with amalgam, miracle mix, cermet, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, and nanocomposites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty primary first and second molars were collected for this study. All the teeth were randomly divided into five groups (n = 10). Standard pulpotomy cavities were prepared. Teeth were air dried and the canal orifices were capped with a layer of zinc oxide eugenol. A lining of calcium hydroxide was placed over it. Amalgam, miracle mix, cermet, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, and nanocomposite were placed in groups I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively. All the samples were then subjected to the fracture strength test using the universal testing machine and the results were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: All the groups were compared by the ANOVA one-way test which indicated that there were statistically significant differences among the five groups. CONCLUSION: Nanocomposites can be considered to be the best restorative material in terms of fracture strength among amalgam, miracle mix, cermet, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Mohammad N, Pattanaik S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Pulpotomized Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(1):5–9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6710954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67109542019-09-06 Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Pulpotomized Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study Mohammad, Noorjahan Pattanaik, Snigdha Reddy, Thimma BV Animireddy, Dwitha Ankireddy, Swetha Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article PURPOSE: This study evaluates the fracture strength of pulpotomized primary molars restored with amalgam, miracle mix, cermet, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, and nanocomposites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty primary first and second molars were collected for this study. All the teeth were randomly divided into five groups (n = 10). Standard pulpotomy cavities were prepared. Teeth were air dried and the canal orifices were capped with a layer of zinc oxide eugenol. A lining of calcium hydroxide was placed over it. Amalgam, miracle mix, cermet, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, and nanocomposite were placed in groups I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively. All the samples were then subjected to the fracture strength test using the universal testing machine and the results were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: All the groups were compared by the ANOVA one-way test which indicated that there were statistically significant differences among the five groups. CONCLUSION: Nanocomposites can be considered to be the best restorative material in terms of fracture strength among amalgam, miracle mix, cermet, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Mohammad N, Pattanaik S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Pulpotomized Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(1):5–9. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6710954/ /pubmed/31496563 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1576 Text en Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Mohammad, Noorjahan
Pattanaik, Snigdha
Reddy, Thimma BV
Animireddy, Dwitha
Ankireddy, Swetha
Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Pulpotomized Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study
title Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Pulpotomized Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Pulpotomized Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Pulpotomized Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Pulpotomized Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Pulpotomized Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of the fracture strength of pulpotomized primary molars: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31496563
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1576
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadnoorjahan comparativeevaluationofthefracturestrengthofpulpotomizedprimarymolarsaninvitrostudy
AT pattanaiksnigdha comparativeevaluationofthefracturestrengthofpulpotomizedprimarymolarsaninvitrostudy
AT reddythimmabv comparativeevaluationofthefracturestrengthofpulpotomizedprimarymolarsaninvitrostudy
AT animireddydwitha comparativeevaluationofthefracturestrengthofpulpotomizedprimarymolarsaninvitrostudy
AT ankireddyswetha comparativeevaluationofthefracturestrengthofpulpotomizedprimarymolarsaninvitrostudy