Cargando…

Is there a social justice variant of South–South health cooperation?: a scoping and critical literature review

Background: In recent decades, global health scholars and policymakers have highlighted the burgeoning role of South–South cooperation (SSC) in health, claiming it constitutes a more just and even-handed approach to health cooperation. But the assertion that SSC inherently challenges power asymmetri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birn, Anne-Emanuelle, Muntaner, Carles, Afzal, Zabia, Aguilera, Mariajosé
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6711117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31315521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1621007
_version_ 1783446462402658304
author Birn, Anne-Emanuelle
Muntaner, Carles
Afzal, Zabia
Aguilera, Mariajosé
author_facet Birn, Anne-Emanuelle
Muntaner, Carles
Afzal, Zabia
Aguilera, Mariajosé
author_sort Birn, Anne-Emanuelle
collection PubMed
description Background: In recent decades, global health scholars and policymakers have highlighted the burgeoning role of South–South cooperation (SSC) in health, claiming it constitutes a more just and even-handed approach to health cooperation. But the assertion that SSC inherently challenges power asymmetries and pursues egalitarian agendas and forms of interaction merits interrogation. Here we explore a transformative, counter-hegemonic, solidarity-oriented form of SSC – social justice-oriented South–South cooperation (SJSSC) – as differentiated from other types of health aid. Objective: The objectives of this scoping review are: 1) to determine what is known and discussed through peer-reviewed and grey literature about SJSSC in health; and 2) to identify the different features and principles of SJSSC. This review seeks to inform research agendas and identify implications for policy and practice around SJSSC. Methods: We conducted a search for relevant peer-reviewed and grey literature in eight languages and screened abstracts that met inclusion criteria. We carried out a full-text review and data extraction on included pieces and conducted a thematic analysis identifying a set of repeated themes related to the features and principles of SJSSC. Results: We identified 188 publications meeting our criteria. Through an iterative process, we developed two overarching categories: values and strategies. Each comprises four themes that allowed us to map the ideas and practices of SJSSC depicted in the literature. The values mapped are: an anti-hegemonic world view; equity-oriented and redistributive political values; egalitarian terms of cooperation; and reciprocity. The strategies encompass: solidarity-building; health justice approaches; mutual exchange and collective justice; and challenging interests of dominant classes in the health arena. Conclusion: This review rectifies ungrounded claims about SSC by identifying and mapping the research literature on SJSSC and has relevance for the conceptualization, policy development, and practice of equitable health cooperation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6711117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67111172019-09-05 Is there a social justice variant of South–South health cooperation?: a scoping and critical literature review Birn, Anne-Emanuelle Muntaner, Carles Afzal, Zabia Aguilera, Mariajosé Glob Health Action Review Article Background: In recent decades, global health scholars and policymakers have highlighted the burgeoning role of South–South cooperation (SSC) in health, claiming it constitutes a more just and even-handed approach to health cooperation. But the assertion that SSC inherently challenges power asymmetries and pursues egalitarian agendas and forms of interaction merits interrogation. Here we explore a transformative, counter-hegemonic, solidarity-oriented form of SSC – social justice-oriented South–South cooperation (SJSSC) – as differentiated from other types of health aid. Objective: The objectives of this scoping review are: 1) to determine what is known and discussed through peer-reviewed and grey literature about SJSSC in health; and 2) to identify the different features and principles of SJSSC. This review seeks to inform research agendas and identify implications for policy and practice around SJSSC. Methods: We conducted a search for relevant peer-reviewed and grey literature in eight languages and screened abstracts that met inclusion criteria. We carried out a full-text review and data extraction on included pieces and conducted a thematic analysis identifying a set of repeated themes related to the features and principles of SJSSC. Results: We identified 188 publications meeting our criteria. Through an iterative process, we developed two overarching categories: values and strategies. Each comprises four themes that allowed us to map the ideas and practices of SJSSC depicted in the literature. The values mapped are: an anti-hegemonic world view; equity-oriented and redistributive political values; egalitarian terms of cooperation; and reciprocity. The strategies encompass: solidarity-building; health justice approaches; mutual exchange and collective justice; and challenging interests of dominant classes in the health arena. Conclusion: This review rectifies ungrounded claims about SSC by identifying and mapping the research literature on SJSSC and has relevance for the conceptualization, policy development, and practice of equitable health cooperation. Taylor & Francis 2019-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6711117/ /pubmed/31315521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1621007 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Birn, Anne-Emanuelle
Muntaner, Carles
Afzal, Zabia
Aguilera, Mariajosé
Is there a social justice variant of South–South health cooperation?: a scoping and critical literature review
title Is there a social justice variant of South–South health cooperation?: a scoping and critical literature review
title_full Is there a social justice variant of South–South health cooperation?: a scoping and critical literature review
title_fullStr Is there a social justice variant of South–South health cooperation?: a scoping and critical literature review
title_full_unstemmed Is there a social justice variant of South–South health cooperation?: a scoping and critical literature review
title_short Is there a social justice variant of South–South health cooperation?: a scoping and critical literature review
title_sort is there a social justice variant of south–south health cooperation?: a scoping and critical literature review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6711117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31315521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1621007
work_keys_str_mv AT birnanneemanuelle isthereasocialjusticevariantofsouthsouthhealthcooperationascopingandcriticalliteraturereview
AT muntanercarles isthereasocialjusticevariantofsouthsouthhealthcooperationascopingandcriticalliteraturereview
AT afzalzabia isthereasocialjusticevariantofsouthsouthhealthcooperationascopingandcriticalliteraturereview
AT aguileramariajose isthereasocialjusticevariantofsouthsouthhealthcooperationascopingandcriticalliteraturereview