Cargando…

The rollout of Community ART Refill Groups in Zimbabwe: a qualitative evaluation

INTRODUCTION: Community ART Refill Groups (CARGs) are an antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery model where clients voluntarily form into groups, and a group member visits the clinic to collect ART for all group members. In late 2016, Zimbabwe began a nationwide rollout of the CARG model. We conducte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bochner, Aaron F, Meacham, Elizabeth, Mhungu, Nathan, Manyanga, Phibion, Petracca, Frances, Muserere, Claudios, Gonese, Gloria, Makunike, Batsirai, Wazara, Blessing, Gwanzura, Clorata, Nyika, Ponesai, Levine, Ruth, Mutasa‐Apollo, Tsitsi, Balachandra, Shirish, Wiktor, Stefan Z
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6711352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31454178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25393
_version_ 1783446503781564416
author Bochner, Aaron F
Meacham, Elizabeth
Mhungu, Nathan
Manyanga, Phibion
Petracca, Frances
Muserere, Claudios
Gonese, Gloria
Makunike, Batsirai
Wazara, Blessing
Gwanzura, Clorata
Nyika, Ponesai
Levine, Ruth
Mutasa‐Apollo, Tsitsi
Balachandra, Shirish
Wiktor, Stefan Z
author_facet Bochner, Aaron F
Meacham, Elizabeth
Mhungu, Nathan
Manyanga, Phibion
Petracca, Frances
Muserere, Claudios
Gonese, Gloria
Makunike, Batsirai
Wazara, Blessing
Gwanzura, Clorata
Nyika, Ponesai
Levine, Ruth
Mutasa‐Apollo, Tsitsi
Balachandra, Shirish
Wiktor, Stefan Z
author_sort Bochner, Aaron F
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Community ART Refill Groups (CARGs) are an antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery model where clients voluntarily form into groups, and a group member visits the clinic to collect ART for all group members. In late 2016, Zimbabwe began a nationwide rollout of the CARG model. We conducted a qualitative evaluation to assess the perceived effects of this new national service delivery model. METHODS: In March‐June 2018, we visited ten clinics implementing the CARG model across five provinces of Zimbabwe and conducted a focus group discussion with healthcare workers and in‐depth interviews with three ART clients per clinic. Clinics had implemented the CARG model for approximately one year. All discussions were audio recorded, transcribed, and translated into English, and thematic coding was performed by two independent analysts. RESULTS: In focus groups, healthcare workers described that CARGs made ART distribution faster and facilitated client tracking in the community. They explained that their reduced workload allowed them to provide better care to those clients who did visit the clinic, and they felt that the CARG model should be sustained in the future. CARG members reported that by decreasing the frequency of clinic visits, CARGs saved them time and money, reducing previous barriers to collecting ART and improving adherence. CARG members also valued the emotional and informational support that they received from other members of their CARG, further improving adherence. Multiple healthcare workers did express concern that CARG members with diseases that begin with minor symptoms, such as tuberculosis, may not seek treatment at the clinic until the disease has progressed. CONCLUSIONS: We found that healthcare workers and clients overwhelmingly perceive CARGs as beneficial. This evaluation demonstrates that the CARG model can be successfully implemented on a national scale. These early results suggest that CARGs may be able to simultaneously improve clinical outcomes and reduce the workload of healthcare workers distributing ART.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6711352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67113522019-08-29 The rollout of Community ART Refill Groups in Zimbabwe: a qualitative evaluation Bochner, Aaron F Meacham, Elizabeth Mhungu, Nathan Manyanga, Phibion Petracca, Frances Muserere, Claudios Gonese, Gloria Makunike, Batsirai Wazara, Blessing Gwanzura, Clorata Nyika, Ponesai Levine, Ruth Mutasa‐Apollo, Tsitsi Balachandra, Shirish Wiktor, Stefan Z J Int AIDS Soc Research Articles INTRODUCTION: Community ART Refill Groups (CARGs) are an antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery model where clients voluntarily form into groups, and a group member visits the clinic to collect ART for all group members. In late 2016, Zimbabwe began a nationwide rollout of the CARG model. We conducted a qualitative evaluation to assess the perceived effects of this new national service delivery model. METHODS: In March‐June 2018, we visited ten clinics implementing the CARG model across five provinces of Zimbabwe and conducted a focus group discussion with healthcare workers and in‐depth interviews with three ART clients per clinic. Clinics had implemented the CARG model for approximately one year. All discussions were audio recorded, transcribed, and translated into English, and thematic coding was performed by two independent analysts. RESULTS: In focus groups, healthcare workers described that CARGs made ART distribution faster and facilitated client tracking in the community. They explained that their reduced workload allowed them to provide better care to those clients who did visit the clinic, and they felt that the CARG model should be sustained in the future. CARG members reported that by decreasing the frequency of clinic visits, CARGs saved them time and money, reducing previous barriers to collecting ART and improving adherence. CARG members also valued the emotional and informational support that they received from other members of their CARG, further improving adherence. Multiple healthcare workers did express concern that CARG members with diseases that begin with minor symptoms, such as tuberculosis, may not seek treatment at the clinic until the disease has progressed. CONCLUSIONS: We found that healthcare workers and clients overwhelmingly perceive CARGs as beneficial. This evaluation demonstrates that the CARG model can be successfully implemented on a national scale. These early results suggest that CARGs may be able to simultaneously improve clinical outcomes and reduce the workload of healthcare workers distributing ART. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6711352/ /pubmed/31454178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25393 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Bochner, Aaron F
Meacham, Elizabeth
Mhungu, Nathan
Manyanga, Phibion
Petracca, Frances
Muserere, Claudios
Gonese, Gloria
Makunike, Batsirai
Wazara, Blessing
Gwanzura, Clorata
Nyika, Ponesai
Levine, Ruth
Mutasa‐Apollo, Tsitsi
Balachandra, Shirish
Wiktor, Stefan Z
The rollout of Community ART Refill Groups in Zimbabwe: a qualitative evaluation
title The rollout of Community ART Refill Groups in Zimbabwe: a qualitative evaluation
title_full The rollout of Community ART Refill Groups in Zimbabwe: a qualitative evaluation
title_fullStr The rollout of Community ART Refill Groups in Zimbabwe: a qualitative evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The rollout of Community ART Refill Groups in Zimbabwe: a qualitative evaluation
title_short The rollout of Community ART Refill Groups in Zimbabwe: a qualitative evaluation
title_sort rollout of community art refill groups in zimbabwe: a qualitative evaluation
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6711352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31454178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25393
work_keys_str_mv AT bochneraaronf therolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT meachamelizabeth therolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT mhungunathan therolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT manyangaphibion therolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT petraccafrances therolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT muserereclaudios therolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT gonesegloria therolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT makunikebatsirai therolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT wazarablessing therolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT gwanzuraclorata therolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT nyikaponesai therolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT levineruth therolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT mutasaapollotsitsi therolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT balachandrashirish therolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT wiktorstefanz therolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT bochneraaronf rolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT meachamelizabeth rolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT mhungunathan rolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT manyangaphibion rolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT petraccafrances rolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT muserereclaudios rolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT gonesegloria rolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT makunikebatsirai rolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT wazarablessing rolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT gwanzuraclorata rolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT nyikaponesai rolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT levineruth rolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT mutasaapollotsitsi rolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT balachandrashirish rolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation
AT wiktorstefanz rolloutofcommunityartrefillgroupsinzimbabweaqualitativeevaluation