Cargando…

Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model

The augmentation index (AIx) is deemed to capture the deleterious effect on left ventricular (LV) work of increased wave reflection associated with stiffer arteries. However, its validity as a proxy for wave reflection magnitude has been questioned. We hypothesized that, in addition to increased wav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G., Delhaas, Tammo, Lumens, Joost, Huberts, Wouter, Spronck, Bart, Hughes, Alun D., Reesink, Koen D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Physiological Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6711407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00769.2018
_version_ 1783446507260739584
author Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G.
Delhaas, Tammo
Lumens, Joost
Huberts, Wouter
Spronck, Bart
Hughes, Alun D.
Reesink, Koen D.
author_facet Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G.
Delhaas, Tammo
Lumens, Joost
Huberts, Wouter
Spronck, Bart
Hughes, Alun D.
Reesink, Koen D.
author_sort Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G.
collection PubMed
description The augmentation index (AIx) is deemed to capture the deleterious effect on left ventricular (LV) work of increased wave reflection associated with stiffer arteries. However, its validity as a proxy for wave reflection magnitude has been questioned. We hypothesized that, in addition to increased wave reflection due to increased pulse wave velocity, LV myocardial shortening velocity influences AIx. Using a computational model of the circulation, we investigated the isolated and combined influences of myocardial shortening velocity v(s,LV) and arterial stiffness on AIx. Aortic blood pressure waveforms were characterized using AIx and the reflected wave pressure amplitude ([Formula: see text] , obtained using wave separation analysis). Our reference simulation (normal v(s,LV) and arterial stiffness) was characterized by an AIx of 21%. A realistic reduction in v(s,LV) caused AIx to increase from 21 to 42%. An arterial stiffness increase, characterized by a relevant 1.0 m/s increase in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, caused AIx to increase from 21 to 41%. Combining the reduced v(s,LV) and increased arterial stiffness resulted in an AIx of 54%. In a multistep parametric analysis, both v(s,LV) and arterial stiffness were about equal determinants of AIx, whereas [Formula: see text] was only determined by arterial stiffness. Furthermore, the relation between increased AIx and LV stroke work was only ≈50% explained by an increase in arterial stiffness, the other factor being v(s,LV). The [Formula: see text] , on the other hand, related less ambiguously to LV stroke work. We conclude that the AIx reflects both cardiac and vascular properties and should not be considered an exclusively vascular parameter. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We used a state-of-the-art computational model to mechanistically investigate the validity of the augmentation index (AIx) as a proxy for (changes in) wave reflection. In contrary to current belief, we found that LV contraction velocity influences AIx as much as increased arterial stiffness, and increased AIx does not necessarily relate to an increase in LV stroke work. Wave reflection magnitude derived from considering pressure, as well as flow, does qualify as a determinant of LV stroke work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6711407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Physiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67114072019-09-10 Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G. Delhaas, Tammo Lumens, Joost Huberts, Wouter Spronck, Bart Hughes, Alun D. Reesink, Koen D. J Appl Physiol (1985) Research Article The augmentation index (AIx) is deemed to capture the deleterious effect on left ventricular (LV) work of increased wave reflection associated with stiffer arteries. However, its validity as a proxy for wave reflection magnitude has been questioned. We hypothesized that, in addition to increased wave reflection due to increased pulse wave velocity, LV myocardial shortening velocity influences AIx. Using a computational model of the circulation, we investigated the isolated and combined influences of myocardial shortening velocity v(s,LV) and arterial stiffness on AIx. Aortic blood pressure waveforms were characterized using AIx and the reflected wave pressure amplitude ([Formula: see text] , obtained using wave separation analysis). Our reference simulation (normal v(s,LV) and arterial stiffness) was characterized by an AIx of 21%. A realistic reduction in v(s,LV) caused AIx to increase from 21 to 42%. An arterial stiffness increase, characterized by a relevant 1.0 m/s increase in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, caused AIx to increase from 21 to 41%. Combining the reduced v(s,LV) and increased arterial stiffness resulted in an AIx of 54%. In a multistep parametric analysis, both v(s,LV) and arterial stiffness were about equal determinants of AIx, whereas [Formula: see text] was only determined by arterial stiffness. Furthermore, the relation between increased AIx and LV stroke work was only ≈50% explained by an increase in arterial stiffness, the other factor being v(s,LV). The [Formula: see text] , on the other hand, related less ambiguously to LV stroke work. We conclude that the AIx reflects both cardiac and vascular properties and should not be considered an exclusively vascular parameter. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We used a state-of-the-art computational model to mechanistically investigate the validity of the augmentation index (AIx) as a proxy for (changes in) wave reflection. In contrary to current belief, we found that LV contraction velocity influences AIx as much as increased arterial stiffness, and increased AIx does not necessarily relate to an increase in LV stroke work. Wave reflection magnitude derived from considering pressure, as well as flow, does qualify as a determinant of LV stroke work. American Physiological Society 2019-08-01 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6711407/ /pubmed/31161882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00769.2018 Text en Copyright © 2019 the American Physiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0: © the American Physiological Society.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G.
Delhaas, Tammo
Lumens, Joost
Huberts, Wouter
Spronck, Bart
Hughes, Alun D.
Reesink, Koen D.
Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model
title Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model
title_full Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model
title_fullStr Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model
title_full_unstemmed Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model
title_short Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model
title_sort augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6711407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00769.2018
work_keys_str_mv AT heusinkveldmaartenhg augmentationindexisnotaproxyforwavereflectionmagnitudemechanisticanalysisusingacomputationalmodel
AT delhaastammo augmentationindexisnotaproxyforwavereflectionmagnitudemechanisticanalysisusingacomputationalmodel
AT lumensjoost augmentationindexisnotaproxyforwavereflectionmagnitudemechanisticanalysisusingacomputationalmodel
AT hubertswouter augmentationindexisnotaproxyforwavereflectionmagnitudemechanisticanalysisusingacomputationalmodel
AT spronckbart augmentationindexisnotaproxyforwavereflectionmagnitudemechanisticanalysisusingacomputationalmodel
AT hughesalund augmentationindexisnotaproxyforwavereflectionmagnitudemechanisticanalysisusingacomputationalmodel
AT reesinkkoend augmentationindexisnotaproxyforwavereflectionmagnitudemechanisticanalysisusingacomputationalmodel