Cargando…
Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model
The augmentation index (AIx) is deemed to capture the deleterious effect on left ventricular (LV) work of increased wave reflection associated with stiffer arteries. However, its validity as a proxy for wave reflection magnitude has been questioned. We hypothesized that, in addition to increased wav...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Physiological Society
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6711407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00769.2018 |
_version_ | 1783446507260739584 |
---|---|
author | Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G. Delhaas, Tammo Lumens, Joost Huberts, Wouter Spronck, Bart Hughes, Alun D. Reesink, Koen D. |
author_facet | Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G. Delhaas, Tammo Lumens, Joost Huberts, Wouter Spronck, Bart Hughes, Alun D. Reesink, Koen D. |
author_sort | Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The augmentation index (AIx) is deemed to capture the deleterious effect on left ventricular (LV) work of increased wave reflection associated with stiffer arteries. However, its validity as a proxy for wave reflection magnitude has been questioned. We hypothesized that, in addition to increased wave reflection due to increased pulse wave velocity, LV myocardial shortening velocity influences AIx. Using a computational model of the circulation, we investigated the isolated and combined influences of myocardial shortening velocity v(s,LV) and arterial stiffness on AIx. Aortic blood pressure waveforms were characterized using AIx and the reflected wave pressure amplitude ([Formula: see text] , obtained using wave separation analysis). Our reference simulation (normal v(s,LV) and arterial stiffness) was characterized by an AIx of 21%. A realistic reduction in v(s,LV) caused AIx to increase from 21 to 42%. An arterial stiffness increase, characterized by a relevant 1.0 m/s increase in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, caused AIx to increase from 21 to 41%. Combining the reduced v(s,LV) and increased arterial stiffness resulted in an AIx of 54%. In a multistep parametric analysis, both v(s,LV) and arterial stiffness were about equal determinants of AIx, whereas [Formula: see text] was only determined by arterial stiffness. Furthermore, the relation between increased AIx and LV stroke work was only ≈50% explained by an increase in arterial stiffness, the other factor being v(s,LV). The [Formula: see text] , on the other hand, related less ambiguously to LV stroke work. We conclude that the AIx reflects both cardiac and vascular properties and should not be considered an exclusively vascular parameter. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We used a state-of-the-art computational model to mechanistically investigate the validity of the augmentation index (AIx) as a proxy for (changes in) wave reflection. In contrary to current belief, we found that LV contraction velocity influences AIx as much as increased arterial stiffness, and increased AIx does not necessarily relate to an increase in LV stroke work. Wave reflection magnitude derived from considering pressure, as well as flow, does qualify as a determinant of LV stroke work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6711407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | American Physiological Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67114072019-09-10 Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G. Delhaas, Tammo Lumens, Joost Huberts, Wouter Spronck, Bart Hughes, Alun D. Reesink, Koen D. J Appl Physiol (1985) Research Article The augmentation index (AIx) is deemed to capture the deleterious effect on left ventricular (LV) work of increased wave reflection associated with stiffer arteries. However, its validity as a proxy for wave reflection magnitude has been questioned. We hypothesized that, in addition to increased wave reflection due to increased pulse wave velocity, LV myocardial shortening velocity influences AIx. Using a computational model of the circulation, we investigated the isolated and combined influences of myocardial shortening velocity v(s,LV) and arterial stiffness on AIx. Aortic blood pressure waveforms were characterized using AIx and the reflected wave pressure amplitude ([Formula: see text] , obtained using wave separation analysis). Our reference simulation (normal v(s,LV) and arterial stiffness) was characterized by an AIx of 21%. A realistic reduction in v(s,LV) caused AIx to increase from 21 to 42%. An arterial stiffness increase, characterized by a relevant 1.0 m/s increase in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, caused AIx to increase from 21 to 41%. Combining the reduced v(s,LV) and increased arterial stiffness resulted in an AIx of 54%. In a multistep parametric analysis, both v(s,LV) and arterial stiffness were about equal determinants of AIx, whereas [Formula: see text] was only determined by arterial stiffness. Furthermore, the relation between increased AIx and LV stroke work was only ≈50% explained by an increase in arterial stiffness, the other factor being v(s,LV). The [Formula: see text] , on the other hand, related less ambiguously to LV stroke work. We conclude that the AIx reflects both cardiac and vascular properties and should not be considered an exclusively vascular parameter. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We used a state-of-the-art computational model to mechanistically investigate the validity of the augmentation index (AIx) as a proxy for (changes in) wave reflection. In contrary to current belief, we found that LV contraction velocity influences AIx as much as increased arterial stiffness, and increased AIx does not necessarily relate to an increase in LV stroke work. Wave reflection magnitude derived from considering pressure, as well as flow, does qualify as a determinant of LV stroke work. American Physiological Society 2019-08-01 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6711407/ /pubmed/31161882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00769.2018 Text en Copyright © 2019 the American Physiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0: © the American Physiological Society. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Heusinkveld, Maarten H. G. Delhaas, Tammo Lumens, Joost Huberts, Wouter Spronck, Bart Hughes, Alun D. Reesink, Koen D. Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model |
title | Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model |
title_full | Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model |
title_fullStr | Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model |
title_full_unstemmed | Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model |
title_short | Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model |
title_sort | augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6711407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00769.2018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heusinkveldmaartenhg augmentationindexisnotaproxyforwavereflectionmagnitudemechanisticanalysisusingacomputationalmodel AT delhaastammo augmentationindexisnotaproxyforwavereflectionmagnitudemechanisticanalysisusingacomputationalmodel AT lumensjoost augmentationindexisnotaproxyforwavereflectionmagnitudemechanisticanalysisusingacomputationalmodel AT hubertswouter augmentationindexisnotaproxyforwavereflectionmagnitudemechanisticanalysisusingacomputationalmodel AT spronckbart augmentationindexisnotaproxyforwavereflectionmagnitudemechanisticanalysisusingacomputationalmodel AT hughesalund augmentationindexisnotaproxyforwavereflectionmagnitudemechanisticanalysisusingacomputationalmodel AT reesinkkoend augmentationindexisnotaproxyforwavereflectionmagnitudemechanisticanalysisusingacomputationalmodel |