Cargando…

ENT Quality Improvement Program as a tool to improve the collection of morbidity and mortality data: a multisite audit carried out over 6 months

OBJECTIVE: This project aims to assess the role of a standardised process of data collection to improve morbidity and mortality data across the region. DESIGN: Six hospitals within the North West (UK) were recruited and adopted the ENT Quality Improvement Program (QIP) into their daily practice. Mon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edmiston, Rachel, Anmolsingh, Rajesh, Khwaja, Sadie, Kumar, B Nirmal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6711441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31523728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000501
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: This project aims to assess the role of a standardised process of data collection to improve morbidity and mortality data across the region. DESIGN: Six hospitals within the North West (UK) were recruited and adopted the ENT Quality Improvement Program (QIP) into their daily practice. Monthly anonymous data were sent back to the reviewer for trend analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Four outcome measures were defined: (1) number of cases recorded within the region each month; (2) assessment of the severity of cases and trends; (3) assessment of action plans reviewing any changes in practice made as a result of using this tool; (4) long-term use of the tool and qualitative feedback from units. RESULTS: 162 patients over the 6 months were included with 180 case discussions. 170 of these were morbidities and 10 were mortalities. Mortality was more frequent in patients with a diagnosis of head and neck cancer. Of the 162 patients, 133 encountered postoperative complications. Post-tonsillectomy (62/133 47%) and post-thyroid surgery (19/133 14%) complications were the most frequently encountered. 66% of the complications were low grade with 18% requiring management under general anaesthetic. Actions plans included four policy reviews with the introduction of three new policies. All sites found the tool user-friendly and are continuing to use it beyond the data collection period. CONCLUSIONS: The ENT QIP has been found to be a simple, user-friendly tool which has improved the quality of data over the six sites and resulted in improvements in practice. Implementation of the tool allows clinicians to critically appraise their practice and to reflect as well as to demonstrate how complications have resulted in change.